Case law

Vincent v. . Vincent

193 N.C. 492 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1927

The petition sets out a good cause of action for divorce from bed and board. … Skittletharpe v. Skittletharpe, 130 N. C., 72 ; Hooper v. Hooper, 164 N. C., 1 ; Crews v. Crews, 175 N. C., 168 .

Hardaway Contracting Co. v. Western Carolina Power Co.

195 N.C. 649 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1928

. *652 We consider this question settled adversely to this contention, by the cases of Green v. Castlebury, 70 N. C., 20 , and Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C., 27 .” … Sneed v. Highway Com., 194 N. C., 46 , 138 S. E., 350 ; S. v. Carroll, 194 N. C., 37 , 138 S. E., 339 ; Corp. Com. v. Mfg. Co., 185 N. C., 17 , 116 S. E., 178 . Appeal dismissed.

Garrett v. . Smith

64 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1870

The rules of construction laid down in Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C., 554 , are only applicable to such contracts. The case before us presents a different kind of contract, i. … is ascertained by evidence, the jury, in adding the depreciation of treasury notes, should be governed by the market value of such currency at the time of the verdict, and judgment should be rendered for amount: Mitchell v.

Peterson v. Ferrell.

127 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1900

Cowand v. Meyers, 99 N. C., 198 ; Wright v. Brown, 116 N. C., 26 ; Douthett v. Bodenhamer, 57 N. C., 444 . … Braswell v. Morehead, 45 N. C., 26 ; Douthett v. Bodenhamer, supra; Gordon v. Lowther, 75 N. C., 198 ; Cowand v. Meyers, supra —where the question is discussed and settled. Affirmed.

In Re State v. . Gordon

225 N.C. 241 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1945

The court "on hearing the motion, overruled the same," and granted the motions of the Board of Education of Wake County and the Board of Education of Chatham County "for judgment on the pleadings, and on the record in the … Harrell v. Welstead , 206 N.C. 817 , 175 S.E. 283 ; Markham v. Carver , 188 N.C. 615 , 125 S.E. 409 . The case is not like S. v.

State v. Robertson

284 N.C. 549 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1974

Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 759 ; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; State v. Harris, 281 N.C. 542 , 189 S.E. 2d 249 ; State v. … Cornell, 281 N.C. 20 , 187 S.E. 2d 768 ; State v. Yoes, 271 N.C. 616, 632 , 157 S.E. 2d 386 ; State v. Brown, 271 N.C. 250 , 156 S.E. 2d 272 .

Koufman v. Koufman

330 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1991

Schloss v. Jamison, 258 N.C. 271, 275 , 128 S.E.2d 590, 593 (1962); Williams v. Williams, 97 N.C. App. 118, 121 , 387 S.E.2d 217, 219 (1990). … A majority of the Court of Appeals panel, relying on Gilmore v. Gilmore, 42 N.C.

Julian v. . Ward

198 N.C. 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1930

Lacy v. Bank, 183 N. C., 373 ; Lovelace v. Pratt, 187 N. C., 686 ; Frazier v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 49 ; Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin, 194 N. C., 768 . … See Hartsfield v. Craven County, 194 N. C., 358 ; Owens v. Wake County, 195 N. C., 132 . In Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin County, 195 N.

Herring v. Volume Merchandise, Inc.

249 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1958

Brown, J., said in Alexander v. … Other illustrations of the application of the principles may be found in Bell v. Brown, 227 N.C. 319 ; Miller v. Teer, supra; Combs v. Brickhouse, supra; Gorrell v. Alspaugh, 120 N.C. 362 ; Taylor v.

Thompson v. . Herring

203 N.C. 112 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 1932

Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375 , 160 S. E., 357 . The parties are not the same and the causes of action are different in the two suits. A final judgment in the action brought in Greene County by L. E. -Herring against B. … Bank v. Broadhurst, 197 N. C., 365 , 148 S. E., 452 . Affirmed.

Harwood v. Shoe.

141 N.C. 161 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1906

Brown, J. … Young v. Hunter, 6 N. Y., 207 ; Buffkin v. Baird, 73 N. C., 283 ; Harris v. Wright, 118 N. C., 422 ; Navigation Co. v. Wilcox, 52 N. C., 481 .

Woody v. Carolina Spruce Co.

178 N.C. 591 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1919

In Woody v. … Woody v. Spruce Co. , 176 N.C. 644 ; Guy v. Fuel Co. , 48 L.R.A. 536 .

Miller v. . Pierce

104 N.C. 389 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

I, 302; Phillips & Amos’ Ev., 776; Cumming v. Arnold, 3 Met., 494 . The strong intimation of this Court in the same direction, in Faw v. Whittington, 72 N. … Faw v. Whittington, supra.

Edenton Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Town of Plymouth

192 N.C. 180 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1926

In Merrimon v. Paving Co., 142 N. … See Jones v. North Wilkesboro, 150 N. C., 646 ; Moore v. Meroney, 154 N. C., 158 ; Bain v. Goldsboro, 164 N. C., 102 .

Bureau v. Armwood

647 S.E.2d 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 2007

647 S.E.2d 95 (2007) FARM BUREAU v. ARMWOOD, et al. No. 99A07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 10, 2007. R. Michael Strickland, Glenn C. Raynor, Raleigh, for N.C.Farm Bureau. … Brown, Greensboro, for Asso. of Defense Attorneys. The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2007 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief: "Motion Allowed.

J. B. Colt Co. v. Barber

205 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1933

See Gaskins v. Mitchell, 194 N. C., 275 , 139 S. E., 435 ; Brown v. Ruffin, 189 N. C., 262 , 126 S. E., 613 ; Owens v. Phelps, 95 N. C., 286 .

State v. . Norris

174 N.C. 808 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 1917

Brown, J. According to the special verdict, the cartway has never been established under the statute. Eevisal, sec. 2686. … Ingrahan v. Hough, 64 N. C., 43 ; Mebane v. Patrick, 46 N. C., 23 .

State Ex Rel. McMullan v. Allen

220 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1941

Adams v. Cleve, 218 N. C., 302 , 10 S. E. (2d), 911 . … Ellison v. Raleigh, 89 N. C., 125 ; Harkrader v. Lawrence, 190 N. C., 441 , 130 S. E., 35 ; Osborne v. Canton, 219 N. C., 139 , 13 S. E. (2d), 265 . The judgment overruling the demurrer is Affirmed.

State v. . Garner

158 N.C. 630 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1912

, 3294, for “allowing” cattle to move from a quarantined area in North Carolina into that portion of the State lying north and west of the quarantine line established by the Board of Agriculture, i. e., from Hoke County into … The authority of the Board of Agriculture to make and enforce such regulation is fully discussed and determined in S. v. R. R., 141 N. C., 846 ; Kimmish v. Ball, 129 U. S., 217 .

State v. Jackson

287 N.C. 470 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975

Dickey v. Florida,, 398 U.S. 30 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 26 , 90 S.Ct. 1564 (1970); State v. Gordon, supra; State v. Brown, supra; State v. George, 271 N.C. 438 , 156 S.E. 2d 845 (1967); State v. … State v. Brown, supra; State v. Ball, 277 N.C. 714 , 178 S.E. 2d 377 (1971) ; State v. Hatcher, 277 N.C. 380 , 177 S.E. 2d 892 (1970) ; State v. Johnson, 275 N.C. 264 , 167 S.E. 2d 274 (1969) ; State v. Hollars, supra.