Case law

Albemarle Lumber Co. v. . Wilcox

105 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Waldo v. her , 33 N.C. 609 ; Morgan Perkins , 46 N.C. 171 ; Cohen v. Stewart , 98 N.C. 97 ; May v. Gentry , 20 N.C. 249 . … Cited: Hemphill v. Annis , 119 N.C. 515 ; Whitlock v. Lumber Co. , 145 N.C. 124 .

Wade v. Wade

313 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1985

330 S.E.2d 616 (1985) 313 N.C. 612 Billy Clifton WADE v. Carolyn Dodson WADE. No. 116P85. Supreme Court of North Carolina May 7, 1985. Vernon, Vernon, Wooten, Brown & Andrews, Burlington, for plaintiff.

State v. Browning

321 N.C. 535 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988

Patrick Browning here. A. . . . And so I went to the defendant over here, Mr. Browning, and asked for identification. He said he didn’t have any. … See State v. Aguallo, 318 N.C. 590 , 350 S.E. 2d 76 (1986); State v. Ramey, 318 N.C. 457 , 349 S.E. 2d 566 (1986); State v. Bowman, 84 N.C. App. 238 , 352 S.E. 2d 437 (1987).

Moore v. . Packer

174 N.C. 665 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1917

Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 396 . If an erroneous judgment, it is an estoppel between the parties until corrected by appeal (Weeks v. McPhail, 128 N. … Vass v. Building Assn., 91 N. C., 55 ; McKee v. Angel, 90 N. C., 60 . An erroneous judgment is one rendered contrary to law.

Jarrell v. . Dyer

170 N.C. 177 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1915

BrowN, J. Emma J. Simmons died in tbe county of Guilford 16 April, 1914, leaving a last will and testament in manner and form as follows : I, Emma J. … Crudup v. Holding, 118 N. C., 230 -231; Young v. Young, 68 N. C., 309 ; Little v. Bennett, 58 N. C., 160 . Affirmed.

Sash Co. v. . Mooney

202 N.C. 830 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1932

The exception and assignment of error made by the board of trustees of the school districts cannot be sustained. … We think on the facts found the law of the case is set forth in Crouse v. Stanley , 199 N.C. 186 . For the reasons given, the judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

Carroway v. . Cox

44 N.C. 173 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1852

Brown on Actions 374. Poole v. Goodwin, 4 Ad. & E. 94. But the main bearing of the defence is upon the Statute of Limitations. It is necessary, therefore, to ascertain when the plaintiff’s cause of action arose. … Lilly v. Hayes, 5 Ad. & E., 548.— Walker v. Rostron, 9 Mees. & Wel., 411.

Winders v. Hill.

141 N.C. 694 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1906

Mechem on Agency, secs. 325 and 353; 2 Paige Cont., sec. 963; Brown v. Smith, 67 N. C., 245 ; Moye v. Cogdell, 69 N. C., 93 ; Burk v. Hubbard, 69 Ala., 379 ; School Dist. v. Ins. Co., 62 Me., 330; Lumpkin v. … Brown v. Smith, supra. The ruling of the court as to parties is reversed, but in all other respects its rulings are sustained. The associates of J. R.

In Re the Will of Crawford

246 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1957

Rudd v. Casualty Co., 202 N.C. 779 , 164 S.E. 345 ; Lumber Co. v. Elizabeth City, 181 N.C. 442 , 107 S.E. 449 ; Bag Co. v. Grocery Co., 171 N.C. 764 , 88 S.E. 512 ; Fisher v. Brown, 135 N.C. 198 , 47 S.E. 398 ; Brown v. … Ellis v. Wellons, 224 N.C. 269 , 29 S.E. 2d 884 ; Davis v. Keen, 142 N.C. 496 , 55 S.E. 359 ; Simmons v. Davenport, 140 N.C. 407 , 53 S.E. 225 .

Stephens v. . Midyette

161 N.C. 323 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1913

Williams v. Lumber Co., 118 N. C., 928 ; Hemmings v. Doss, 125 N. C., 402 . The assignment, even of a mortgage, is not required to be registered. Williams v. Brown, 127 N. C., 51 . No error.

State v. Carlisle

287 N.C. 261 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1975

214 S.E.2d 433 (1975) 287 N.C. 261 STATE of North Carolina v. Preston Maynard CARLISLE. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 6, 1975. Duke & Brown, for defendant. Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., R.

State v. Wright

274 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1968

Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 , 74 S. Ct. 667 , 98 L. Ed. 866 ; Brown v. Allen, supra; State v. Wilson, supra; Miller v. State, supra. … Brown v. Allen, supra; State v. Yoes, supra; State v. Lowry and Mallory, supra.

State v. . McLean

209 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

State v. Brown, 182 N. C., 761 ; State v. Rice, 202 N. C., 411 . *40 Defendant’s exception to the denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit cannot he sustained. … State v. Lancaster, 202 N. C., 204 ; State v. Rawls, 202 N. C., 397 ; 20 C. J., 487.

Harrell v. . Goerch

209 N.C. 741 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1936

As the article was shown to be libelous, Brown v. Lumber Co., 167 N. C., 9 , 82 S. E., 961 , and the defendants have not pleaded *743 privilege, justification, or mitigating circumstances, O. … Alley v. Long, ante, 245; Hartsfield v. Hines, 200 N. C., 356 , 157 S. E., 16 ; Gudger v. Penland, 108 N. C., 593 , 13 S. E., 168 ; Broadway v. Cope, 208 N. C., 85 ; McIntosh, Practice and Procedure, 365; 17 R. G.

City of Kannapolis v. City of Concord

326 N.C. 512 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1990

City of Kannapolis v. City of Concord, 95 N.C. App. 591 , 383 S.E.2d 402 (1989). … Huntley v. Potter, 255 N.C. 619, 627 , 122 S.E.2d 681, 686 (1961).

Sykes v. Clayton

274 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1968

Section 2 thereof provides: “The Board of Elections of Mecklen-burg County, upon the written request of the Mecklenburg Board of County Commissioners, or upon receipt of a petition signed by qualified voters of the county … See also Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 11 Cal. 2d 156 , 78 P. 2d 731 , 117 A.L.R. 838, 846 ; 128 A.L.R. 894 , 895.” Hooten v. Carson, 186 Tenn. 282 , 209 S.W. 2d 273 . This excerpt from 47 Am.

Wilmington Furniture Co. v. Cole

207 N.C. 847 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1935

The tests set up by law for determining the granting of a new trial for newly discovered evidence are capitulated in Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431 , 79 S. E., 690 ; Brown v. Hillsboro, 185 N. … C., 368 , 117 S.E., 41 , and S. v. Casey, 201 N. C., 620 .

Daniel v. McRae

9 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1823

Plaintiff, relied upon the cases of Smith v. Knox — (3 Esp. Rep. 46, and Charles *602 v. Marsden — (1 Taunt. 224.) I allude to the case of Brown v. Mott — ( 7 Johnson 361 .) … The case 15 East's Rep. 216 — Brown and others v. Maffey, may on first view seem to be artalagous. But Í think it essentially differs.

CHAS. H. JENKINS & COMPANY v. Lewis

259 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1963

Williams v. Hunter, 257 N.C. 754 , 127 S.E.2d 546 ; Mercer v. Hilliard, 249 N.C. 725 , 107 S.E.2d 554 , and cases cited. … Commercial Credit Corporation v. Brown (Tex.

State v. . Casey

201 N.C. 185 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 1931

In S. v. … "In S. v.