Case law

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

664 S.E.2d 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 2008

664 S.E.2d 564 (2008) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 24, 2008. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Greensboro, for Harleysvilie Mutual Ins. Co.

State v. Fullwood

323 N.C. 371 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1988

State v. Robbins, 319 N.C. 465, 494 , 356 S.E. 2d 279, 296-97 (1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 98 L.Ed. 2d 226 (1988) (quoting Brown v. … State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 194 , 358 S.E. 2d 1, 12 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 98 L.Ed. 2d 406 (1987); State v.

W. O. Muller & Co. v. Commissioners of Buncombe County

89 N.C. 171 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1883

State v. Melton, Busb., 49; State v. Woodside, 9 Ired., 496 . … This is all the board of commissioners have done in this case.

Smith v. . Kappas

219 N.C. 850 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1941

See also Spencer v. Brown , 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 ; Kolman v. Silbert, ante , 134; Barnes v. Teer, ante , 823. The provisions of this statute confer a substantial legal right. Williams v. … Spencer v. Brown, supra; Hauser v. Furniture Co., supra . Trial by jury which is vouchsafed in the Constitution means more than a mere trial by jurors.

Davenport v. . Patrick

227 N.C. 686 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1947

Harrison v. Carter, 226 N. C., 36 , 36 S. E. (2d), 700 ; Pearson v. Stores Corp., 219 N. C., 717 , 14 S. E. (2d), 811 ; Brown v. R. R., 202 N. C., 256 , 162 S. E., 613 ; Holmes v. Wharton, 194 N. C., 470 , 140 S. … Pearson v. Stores Corp., supra; Reid v. Coach Co., 215 N. C., 469 , 2 S. E. (2d), 578 ; Brown v. R. R., 204 N. C., 668 , 169 S. E., 419 ; Goldsmith v. Samet, 201 N. C., 574 , 160 S. E., 835 ; Parker v. Potter, 200 N.

Pender County v. . King

197 N.C. 50 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1929

S. v. Martin, supra; Oats v. Bryan, 14 N. C., 451 ; Bell v. Jasper, 37 N. C., 597 ; Moore v. Boudinot, 64 N. C., 190 ; Pickens v. Miller, 83 N. C., 544 ; Fidelity, etc., Co. v. Fleming, 132 N. C., 332 . … Lenoir County v. Taylor, 190 N. C., 336 . The appointee of the board of county commissioners of Pender County, having failed to give bond, the office again was declared vacant and King appointed sheriff.

State v. . Darnell

166 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1914

On 5 July, 1912, tbe board of aldermen of Winston, N. … Washington v. Hammond, 16 N. C., 33 ; S. v. Langston, 88 N. C., 692 ; S. v. Brittain, 89 N. C., 574 .

Albemarle Lumber Co. v. . Wilcox

105 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Waldo v. her , 33 N.C. 609 ; Morgan Perkins , 46 N.C. 171 ; Cohen v. Stewart , 98 N.C. 97 ; May v. Gentry , 20 N.C. 249 . … Cited: Hemphill v. Annis , 119 N.C. 515 ; Whitlock v. Lumber Co. , 145 N.C. 124 .

State v. . Williams

208 N.C. 352 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1935

S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747 , 175 S. E., 116 . No bond was required, as the defendant was granted the privilege of appealing in forma pau-peris. S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601 , 166 S. E., 734 . … S. v. Hamlet, 206 N. C., 568 , 174 S. E., 451 . Tbe motion of tbe Attorney-General must be allowed. S. v. Watson, ante, 70. Appeal dismissed.

Harwood v. Shoe.

141 N.C. 161 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1906

Brown, J. … Young v. Hunter, 6 N. Y., 207 ; Buffkin v. Baird, 73 N. C., 283 ; Harris v. Wright, 118 N. C., 422 ; Navigation Co. v. Wilcox, 52 N. C., 481 .

In Re Belk

691 S.E.2d 685 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2010

State v. Fie, 320 N.C. 626, 627 , 359 S.E.2d 774, 775 (1987) (citations omitted). … Respondent violated Canons 1, 2A, and 5C(2) by failing to resign from the Sonic Board and by intentionally misrepresenting the reasons for his continued membership on the board during the Commission's investigation.

State v. . Norris

174 N.C. 808 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 1917

Brown, J. According to the special verdict, the cartway has never been established under the statute. Eevisal, sec. 2686. … Ingrahan v. Hough, 64 N. C., 43 ; Mebane v. Patrick, 46 N. C., 23 .

Armstrong v. McInnis

264 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1965

Penny v. … In McKinney v.

State v. . Rice

83 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

State v. Patterson, 78 N. C., 470 ; Cobb v. Fogalman, 1 Ired., 440 ; Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; State v. Vinson, 63 N. C., 335 . There is error.

Cobb Bros. v. Guthrie

160 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1912

BrowN, J. This action is brought to recover $280 alleged in tbe complaint to be due the plaintiffs by defendant. … Burns v. Tomlinson, 147 N. C., 647 ; Garseed v. Sternberger, 135 N. C., 502 ; Burrus v. Witcover, 158 N. C., 384 . The judgment of the Superior Court is Affirmed.

Clark v. Crompton & Knowles Loom Works

150 N.C. 789 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1909

Per Curiam : The matters presented upon this appeal are the same as are involved in the case of David Clark, The Eugenia Manufacturing Company et al. v. Saco-Pettee Machine Company et al. … The assignments of error are covered by and disposed of in the opinion of Justice Brown, delivered for the Court in that case, ante, 2>Ti. Affirmed.

Hilliard v. . Phillips

81 N.C. 99 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

In Brown v. … Cited: Roberts v. Roberts , 82 N.C. 33 ; Wharton v. Eborn , 88 N.C. 346 ; Gadsby v. Dyer , 91 N.C. 315 ; Woodley v. Hassell , 94 N.C. 160 ; Magee v. Blankenship , 95 N.C. 568 ; Blow v. Vaughan , 105 N.C. 210 ; Perry v.

Lemly v. Commissioners of Forsyth

85 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1881

Rouse, 9 Wall., 468 ; Tappan v. Merch. Nat. Bank, 19 Wall., 490 ; Provident Ins. Co. v. Boston, 101 Mass., 595 . … Bank v. Kimball, supra, and by this court in London v. Wilmington, 78 N. C., 109 .

Surry County v. . Sparger

200 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1931

This question is discussed in Eliason v. Colerman, 86 N. C., 236 , and by McIntosh’s North Carolina Practice and Procedure, section 964, page 1089, and cases cited in support of the text. … None of the legislative acts referred to undertake to abolish the board of county commissioners or to deprive said board of the power to discharge the duties imposed upon it by law.

Staley v. City of Winston-Salem

258 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1962

The 1947 Legislature found it necessary to further limit the places where sales might be made and to enlarge the powers of the State Board of Alcoholic Control. C. 1098, S. L. 1947. … Davis v. Charlotte, 242 N.C. 670 , 89 S.E. 2d 406 .