Case law

Wells v. Consolidated Judicial Retirement System

354 N.C. 313 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 2001

On 30 September 1997 plaintiff brought suit against the CJRS, the Board of Trustees of the TSERS (Board), and the State of North Carolina on the ground that he was entitled to receive his monthly retirement allowance under … See Childers v.

Culbreth v. . Hall

159 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1912

Brown, J. … Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 151 ; Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 362 . 4.

Holstein v. Phillips & Sims

146 N.C. 366 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1907

Quinton v. Courtney, 2 N. C., 40 ; Neal v. Wilcox, 49 N. C., 146 . … In Bonner v.

In Re Will of Hall

252 N.C. 70 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1960

Brown stated that in 1947 Mrs. Hall showed him a marriage license, he didn! … Practice and Procedure, McIntosh, sec. 1545, p. 69; State v. Stephenson, 218 N.C. 258, 265 , 10 S.E. 2d 819 ; Brown v. Buchanan, 194 N.C. 675, 679 , 140 S.E. 749 .

Rider v. Lenoir County

236 N.C. 620 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1953

S. v. Smith, 221 N.C. 400 , 20 S.E. 2d 360 ; S. v. Lea, 203 N.C. 13 , 164 S.E. 737 . … G.S. 131-126.23; Adams v. City of Durham, 189 N.C. 232 , 126 S.E. 611 ; Nash v. City of Monroe, 198 N.C. 306 , 151 S.E. 634 ; Mewborn v. City of Kinston, 199 N.C. 72 , 154 S.E. 76 ; Burleson v.

Dickson v. . Brewer

180 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1920

Also Williams v. … Mills v. Comrs. , 175 N.C. 218 .

Reeves v. . Haynes

88 N.C. 310 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

In Sutton v. Askew, 66 N. … The homestead being out of the way, and the legal title vesting in the plaintiff under the deed from the mortgagee, Brown, AAe can perceive no obstruction to his recovery of the possession of the land. Wittkowski v.

Denny v. . Palmer

27 N.C. 610 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1845

Brown v. Maffey, 15 East, 216. Legge v. Thorpe, 12 East, 171. … We do not question, that an engagement by an endorser, upon any adequate consideration, though not a full one, to make the debts his own, will bind him; as in Corney v. Da Costa, and in Brown v. Maffey. So in Bond v.

Alford v. Shaw

320 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1987

See Trust Co. v. Gill, State Treasurer, 293 N.C. 164 , 237 S.E. 2d 21 (1977); Clary v. Board of Education, 286 N.C. 525 , 212 S.E. 2d 160 (1975). … In Miller v.

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Whitehurst

203 N.C. 302 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1932

C., 256 ; Brown v. Turner, 202 N. C., 227 . We think on all the evidence in this case, there was no novation, express or implied. There was no substitution of a new debt or obligation for an existing one. In Brown v. … Rouse v. Wooten, 140 N. C., 557 ; Edwards v. Insurance Co., 173 N. C., 614 ; Horton v. Wilson, 175 N. C., 533 . Walters v. Rogers, 198 N.

Howard v. UNC-CHAPEL HILL

648 S.E.2d 504 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 2007

HOWARD, Employee v. UNC-CHAPEL HILL, Employer and Key Risk Management Services, Carrier. No. 69P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina, June 27, 2007. Christopher G. … Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, for UNC-Chapel Hill, Jay A. Gervasi, Greensboro, for Howard.

Troy & North Carolina Gold Mining Co. v. Snow Lumber Co.

170 N.C. 273 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1915

Brown v. Brown, 168 N. … Institute v. Norwood, 45 N. C., 65 ; Ryan v. Martin, 91 N. C., 465 ; Asheville Division v. Aston, 92 N. C., 579 , 584; Simmons v. Allison, 118 N. C., 776; Keith v. Scales, 124 N. C., 497 ; Walker v. Miller, 139 N.

State v. Williams

334 N.C. 440 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1993

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984); State v. Sumpter, 318 N.C. 102, 107-08 , 347 S.E.2d 396, 399 (1986). … See Sales Co. v. Board of Transportation, 292 N.C. 437, 442 , 233 S.E.2d 569, 572 (1977) (blasting with explosives considered “ultrahazardous activity”).

State v. . Tytus

98 N.C. 705 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

'There are some exceptions, as was said in State v. Harper, 64 *707 N. C., 129, and State v. Stanton, 1 Ired., 424 . … In the State v.

Greene v. Harmon

260 N.C. 344 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1963

In Pittman v. … Barnes v. Teer, 219 N.C. 823 , 15 S.E. 2d 379 ; Kolman v. Silbert, 219 N.C. 134 , 12 S.E. 2d 915 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 ; Williams v. Coach Co., 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 ; Bowen v.

Kendall v. . Stafford

178 N.C. 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1919

Gregory v. Ellis , 82 N.C. 226 . … White v. Connelly , 105 N.C. 70 . In Snipes v. Winston , 126 N.C. 374 , which is approved in Davidson v.

Conover v. Newton

297 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 12, 1979

In Allman v. … Other jurisdictions have held that signatures may not be withdrawn once a sufficient petition has been filed with the governing board of a municipality. E.g., City of Roanoke v.

Carnes v. . Carnes

204 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1933

Only the party injured is entitled to a divorce from bed and board under C. S., 1660. Sanderson v. Sanderson, 178 N. C., 339 , 100 S. E., 590 . See, also, Reeves v. Reeves, 203 N. C., 792 . … Dowdy v. Dowdy, 154 N. C., 556 , 70 S. E., 917 ; Martin v. Martin, supra; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 109 N. C., 139 , 13 S. E., 887 ; Jackson v. Jackson, 105 N. C., 433 , 11 S. E., 173 ; White v. White, 84 N. C., 340 .

Vaughan v. . Vaughan

211 N.C. 354 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1937

Code, supra, is as follows: “Grounds for divorce from bed and board. … Brewer v. Brewer, 198 N. C., 669 . Only the party injured is entitled to a divorce from bed and board under this section. Carnes v. Carnes, 204 N. C., 636 (637); Albritton v. Albritton, 210 N. C., 111 (116). N. C.

Williams v. . Williams

215 N.C. 739 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1939

Griffin v. Graham, 8 N. C., 96; S. v. Gerard, 37 N. C., 210 ; Keith v. Scales, 124 N. C., 497 , 32 S. E., 809 ; Whitsett v. Clapp, 200 N. C., 647 , 158 S. E., 183 . … S. v. Gerard, supra.