Case law

Supply Co. v. . R. R.

180 N.C. 318 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1920

(For digest, see Perry v. R. R., ante , 290.) The questions raised by this appeal are substantially those decided in Perry v. R. R. , at this term, and upon that authority the judgment is affirmed. No error. … WALKER and BROWN, JJ., dissent for reasons stated in dissenting opinion in Perry v. R. R. , at this term.

Wright v. Iredell Telephone Co.

182 N.C. 308 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1921

Co. v. Downs, 126 Iowa, 80 ; 3 Amer. Cas., 187, and note. As bearing somewhat ujron this |>oint see, also, White v. Kincaid, 149 N. C., 415 . In the case of Longyear v. Hardman, 219 Mass., 405 , Rugg, C. … Counsel for appellant have called our attention to the decisions of this Court rendered in Bridgers v. Bank, 152 N. C., 293 , and Sheppard v. Power Co., 150 N.

Perry v. . Swanner

150 N.C. 141 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1909

Brown, J. It. is contended that a defect in parties can be taken advantage of only by demurrer, and that the objection comes too late at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. … Abrams v. Qureton, 74 N. C., 523 ; Battle v. Davis, 66 N. C., 252 .

Weaver v. . Hampton

204 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Weaver v. Hampton, 201 N. C., 798 . … Tbe Circuit Court of Appeals for tbe Fourth Circuit in Board of Commis *45 sioners v. Tollman, 145 Fed., 753 , recognized and sanctioned tbe right of county commissioners to compromise law suits.

Joyner v. Early

139 N.C. 49 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1905

Brown, J. The plaintiff sued out claim and delivery proceedings for the mule and filed the ordinary complaint alleging simply ownership upon the part of the plaintiff and wrongful detention by the defendant. … DesFarges v. Pugh, 93 N. C., 31 ; Wilson v. White, 80 N. C., 280 ; Wallace v. Cohen, 111 N. C., 103 ; Bishop on Contracts, section 661; Benjamin on Sales, section 656 and note; Donaldson v. Farwell, 93 U.

Woolen Mills v. . Land Co.

183 N.C. 511 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 17, 1922

Van Fleet, V. … Cited: Cotton Mills v. Comrs. , 184 N.C. 229 , 230 ; Kinsland v. Kinsland , 188 N.C. 811 ; Advertising Co. v. Asheville , 189 N.C. 739 ; Vester v. Nashville , 190 N.C. 268 ; Bank v. Bank , 194 N.C. 722 ; Lineberger v.

City of Winston-Salem v. Winston-Salem City Coach Lines, Inc.

245 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1956

Transit Co. v. Coach Co., 228 N.C. 768 , 47 S.E. 2d 297 ; City Coach Co. v. Transit Co., 227 N.C. 391 , 42 S.E. 2d 398 ; Warren v. R. R., 223 N.C. 843 , 28 S.E. 2d 505 ; Carolina Motor Service v. R. … Utilities Commission v. Coach Co., 236 N.C. 583 , 73 S.E. 2d 562 .

Redden v. . Toms

211 N.C. 312 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1937

See Brown v. Guthery, 190 N. C., 822 , 130 S. E., 836 . … See Brown v. Guthery, supra. Neither Charles French Toms, Sr., nor Meta Toms, as bis widow or as bis executrix, now have any right, title, interest, or estate in said land.

Goodman v. . Goodman

201 N.C. 808 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1931

C., 93 ; Alley v. Hampton, 13 N. C., 11 ; Long v. Gantley, 20 N. C., 457 ; Brown v. Morris, 20 N. C., 565 ; MacRae v. Lilly, 23 N. C., 118 ; Boykin v. Perry, 49 N. C., 325 ; Vest v. Cooper, 68 N. C., 131 ; Watts v. … Harvey v. R. R., 153 N. C., 567 , 69 S. E., 627 ; Boney v. R. R., 145 N. C., 248 , 58 S. E., 1082 ; Slocumb v. Construction Co., 142 N. C., 349 , 55 S. E., 196 ; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 , 52 S.

Henderson County v. Johnson

230 N.C. 723 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1949

In re Collins, 226 N.C. 412 , 38 S.E. 2d 160 ; Wilson v. Robinson, 224 N.C. 851 , 32 S.E. 2d 601 ; Vestal v. Vending Machine Co., 219 N.C. 468 , 14 S.E. 2d 427 ; Brown v. … Williamson v. Spivey, supra; Graham v. Floyd, 214 N.C. 77 , 197 S.E. 873 ; S. v.

Doyle v. Aldermen of Raleigh

89 N.C. 133 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1883

The plaintiff, elected an alderman of the city of Raleigh, and having taken the oath of office and met and acted with his associate members of the board, was ejected from his seat by a resolution of the body, on the ground … Worthy v. Barrett, 63 N. C., 199 . An office admitting of the remedy by quo warranto for amotion is defined by Mr. High, and quoted in Eliason v. Coleman, 86 N.

State v. . Weddington

103 N.C. 364 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

State v. Gould, 90 N. … Rex v. Grounsell, C. & P., 121. The State introduced, as a witness, the colored man, Moses McMillan, who was in the grasp of the deceased at the time of killing.

Gulf Refining Co. v. McKernan

179 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1920

County Board of Education v. State Board, 106 N. C., 81 ; Hartman v. Collins, 106 N. Y. Supr. Ct., 11. … Betts v. Raleigh, 142 N. C., 229 ; Godwin v. Carolina Tel. Co., 136 N. C., 258 ; Hall v. State, 82 Ala., 563 ; Chicot County v. Kruse, 47 Ark., 80; State ex re Ry. Co. v. Latrobe, 81 Md., 223 ; State ex re Matheny v.

State v. Jeffreys

174 N.C. 804 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1917

Brown, J. This case is covered by the ruling in S. v. Hicks, at this . term. The judgment is Affirmed.

State Ex rel.Swaringen v. Poplin

211 N.C. 700 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1937

The defendant contends that under the law it is the duty of the county board of elections to judicially determine the result of the election from the report and tabulation made by the precinct officials. … Rhodes v. Love, 153 N. C., 469 ; Johnston v. Board of Elections, 172 N. C., 162 , 167.” S. v. Carter, 194 N. C., 293 ; Bouldin v. Davis, 197 N. C., 731 ; Barbee v. Comrs. of Wake, 210 N. C., 717 .

State v. . Griffin

125 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1899

State v. Huntley, 25 N. C., 418 . … Brown, 82 N. C., 585 , which holds that an indictment on a conviction for an affray may be legally described as for an *694 assault and. battery, citing State v. Allen, 11 N. C., 356 , and State v. Wilson, 61 N.

State v. . Moschoures

214 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1938

Brown, being duly sworn, complains and says, that at and in said county, on, or about the 4th day of December, 1937, Chris Moschoures did unlawfully, willfully and feloniously have and keep in his possession for the purpose … S. v. Farrington, 141 N. C., 844 ; S. v. Daniels, 197 N. C., 285 , and cases there cited. The judgment below is Affirmed.

Hammond v. . McRae

182 N.C. 747 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1921

Reid v. R. R. , 162 N.C. 355 , and there are *Page 805 authoritative decisions elsewhere extending the principle to the action of the electorate. Township Board v. Carolan , 182 Ill. 119 ; McGillivray, Appellant, v. … Cited: Jones v. New Bern , 184 N.C. 134 ; Miller v. School Dist. , 184 N.C. 202 ; Galloway v. Bd. of Ed. , 184 N.C. 248 ; Burney v. Comrs. , 184 N.C. 277 ; Bd. of Ed. v. Bray , 184 N.C. 487 ; S. v.

Wolfe v. Pearson

114 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1894

In Zottman v. … State v. Long, 94 N. C., 896 . It was broadly stated in State v.

Spruill v. Davenport

178 N.C. 364 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

C., 63 , and Baker v. State, 27 Ind., 485 . See, also, Scott v. Fishblate, 117 N. C., 265 ; Burton v. Fulton, 49 Pa. St., 151; Stewart v. Southard, 17 Ohio St., 402 ; Reed v. Conway, 20 Mo., 22 ; Donahoe v. … Ruffin v. Garrett, 174 N. C., 134 . The passage quoted by plaintiff’s counsel from 35 Cyc., 1095, does not sustain the position that the members of the board- are liable individually.