Case law

State v. . Etheridge

207 N.C. 801 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1935

S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747 , 175 S. E., 116 . No appeal bond was required, as tbe defendant was granted tbe privilege of appealing in forma pauperis. S. v. Stafford, 203 N. C., 601 , 166 S. … S. v. Goldston, 201 N. C., 89 , 158 S. E., 926 . No error appears on the face of the record. S. v. Hamlet, 206 N. C., 568 , 174 S. E., 451 ; S. v. Edney, 202 N. C., 706 , 164 S. E., 23 .

Norment v. . Johnston

32 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1849

Hogg v. Ashe, 1 Hay. 471 . But it is argued for the defendant, •that, under the agreement with Alexander, she has a right to charge the board to the firm, and that, therefore, it is a good set off. … Cotton v. Evans, 1 Dev. & Bat. Eq. 284 , Weed v. Richardson, 2 Dev. & Bat. 535.

Neighbors v. Neighbors

236 N.C. 531 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1952

Phillips v. Ray, 190 N.C. 152 , 129 S.E. 177 ; Wellons v. Lassiter, 200 N.C. 474 , 157 S.E. *533 434; Revis v. Ramsey, 202 N.C. 815 , 164 S.E. 358 ; S. v. Lea, 203 N.C. 316 , 166 S.E. 292 ; S. v. … Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N.C. 1 ; Henry v. Hilliard, 120 N.C. 479 , 27 S.E. 130 ; Price v. Insurance Co., 201 N.C. 376 , 160 S.E. 367 ; Newton v. Mfg. Co., 206 N.C. 533 , 174 S.E. 449 ; Davis v.

State v. . Tola

222 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1942

See Phillips v. Higdon, Busb., 380; Foster v. Woodfin, 65 N. C., 29 ; Mayo v. Whitson, 2 Jones, 231 ; Kirkland v. Mangum, 5 Jones, 313 .” R. R. v. Reid, supra. … The State offered evidence to the effect that drinks were purchased and sold at defendant’s place of business on 10 October, 1941, to an officer of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board and to the chemist of said board

Hubbard v. . Winborne

20 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1838

The question was whether the plaintiff could recover the value of the brown mare. His Honor, being of opinion that he could, a verdict for the plaintiff was returned by the jury and the defendant appealed. … Dist.: Sharpe v. Pearce , 74 N.C. 603 .

Harris v. Quarry Co.

132 N.C. 1151 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1903

from Henderson. to correct judgment of this court denied, on authority of Barnhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 710 .

Hilliard v. City of Asheville

118 N.C. 845 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

King v. Railroad, 66 N. C., 297 . It is not a question in any wise of eminent domain, or taking private property for public use, (White v. … Peace, supra, and numerous other cases, among them Chicago v. Joliet, 39 N. E. Rep., 1077; McKeesport v. Busch, 33 N.

In Re Annexation Ordinance D-21927 Adopted by City of Winston-Salem

303 N.C. 220 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1981

Clark v. Kansas City, 176 U.S. 114 , 20 S.Ct. 284 , 44 L.Ed. 392 (1900); Wilkerson v. City of Coralville, 478 F. 2d 709 (8th Cir. 1973); Garren v. … Upon review the judge may examine the annexation proceedings to determine only whether the municipal governing board substantially complied with the requirements of the applicable annexation statutes. Id.; Humphries v.

R. R. v. . Commissioners

116 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

Frank, Jr., Chairman Board County Canvassers; Hill King, Secretary, et al .) … Cited: Claybrook v. Comrs. , 117 N.C. 462 ; Quinn v. Lattimore , 120 N.C. 433 ; Mayo v. Comrs. , 122 N.C. 12 ; Charlotte v. Shepard, ib. , 603; McNeely v. Morganton , 125 N.C. 379 ; Cox v.

Alliance Company v. State Hospital at Butner

241 N.C. 329 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 14, 1955

However, this Court, in Bor *334 ders v. … The case of Lyon & Sons v. Board of Education, 238 N.C. 24 , 76 S.E. 2d, 553 , cited and relied upon by appellee is distinguishable in factual situation from case in hand.

Atkinson v. . Whitehead

77 N.C. 418 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877

Klutz v. McKenzie, 65 N. C. 102 ; Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C. 27 ; Green v. Castlebury, Ibid, 20; Keener v. Finger, Ibid, 35.

Perry v. . Swanner

150 N.C. 141 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1909

Brown, J. It. is contended that a defect in parties can be taken advantage of only by demurrer, and that the objection comes too late at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. … Abrams v. Qureton, 74 N. C., 523 ; Battle v. Davis, 66 N. C., 252 .

Weaver v. . Hampton

204 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Weaver v. Hampton, 201 N. C., 798 . … Tbe Circuit Court of Appeals for tbe Fourth Circuit in Board of Commis *45 sioners v. Tollman, 145 Fed., 753 , recognized and sanctioned tbe right of county commissioners to compromise law suits.

Joyner v. Early

139 N.C. 49 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1905

Brown, J. The plaintiff sued out claim and delivery proceedings for the mule and filed the ordinary complaint alleging simply ownership upon the part of the plaintiff and wrongful detention by the defendant. … DesFarges v. Pugh, 93 N. C., 31 ; Wilson v. White, 80 N. C., 280 ; Wallace v. Cohen, 111 N. C., 103 ; Bishop on Contracts, section 661; Benjamin on Sales, section 656 and note; Donaldson v. Farwell, 93 U.

Gulf Refining Co. v. McKernan

179 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1920

County Board of Education v. State Board, 106 N. C., 81 ; Hartman v. Collins, 106 N. Y. Supr. Ct., 11. … Betts v. Raleigh, 142 N. C., 229 ; Godwin v. Carolina Tel. Co., 136 N. C., 258 ; Hall v. State, 82 Ala., 563 ; Chicot County v. Kruse, 47 Ark., 80; State ex re Ry. Co. v. Latrobe, 81 Md., 223 ; State ex re Matheny v.

City of Winston-Salem v. Winston-Salem City Coach Lines, Inc.

245 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1956

Transit Co. v. Coach Co., 228 N.C. 768 , 47 S.E. 2d 297 ; City Coach Co. v. Transit Co., 227 N.C. 391 , 42 S.E. 2d 398 ; Warren v. R. R., 223 N.C. 843 , 28 S.E. 2d 505 ; Carolina Motor Service v. R. … Utilities Commission v. Coach Co., 236 N.C. 583 , 73 S.E. 2d 562 .

Redden v. . Toms

211 N.C. 312 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1937

See Brown v. Guthery, 190 N. C., 822 , 130 S. E., 836 . … See Brown v. Guthery, supra. Neither Charles French Toms, Sr., nor Meta Toms, as bis widow or as bis executrix, now have any right, title, interest, or estate in said land.

Goodman v. . Goodman

201 N.C. 808 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1931

C., 93 ; Alley v. Hampton, 13 N. C., 11 ; Long v. Gantley, 20 N. C., 457 ; Brown v. Morris, 20 N. C., 565 ; MacRae v. Lilly, 23 N. C., 118 ; Boykin v. Perry, 49 N. C., 325 ; Vest v. Cooper, 68 N. C., 131 ; Watts v. … Harvey v. R. R., 153 N. C., 567 , 69 S. E., 627 ; Boney v. R. R., 145 N. C., 248 , 58 S. E., 1082 ; Slocumb v. Construction Co., 142 N. C., 349 , 55 S. E., 196 ; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 , 52 S.

Henderson County v. Johnson

230 N.C. 723 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1949

In re Collins, 226 N.C. 412 , 38 S.E. 2d 160 ; Wilson v. Robinson, 224 N.C. 851 , 32 S.E. 2d 601 ; Vestal v. Vending Machine Co., 219 N.C. 468 , 14 S.E. 2d 427 ; Brown v. … Williamson v. Spivey, supra; Graham v. Floyd, 214 N.C. 77 , 197 S.E. 873 ; S. v.

Bundy v. . Powell

229 N.C. 707 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1949

The plaintiff asks a reversal upon the authority of Cashatt v. Brown, 211 N. C. 367 , 190 S. E. 480 , and Moore v. R. R., 201 N. C. 26 , 158 S. E. 556 . … Cashatt v. Brown, supra; Moore v. R. R., supra; Stone v. R. R., 197 N. C. 429 , 149 S. E. 399 ; Goforth v. R. R., 144 N. C. 569 , 57 S. E. 209 ; G.S. 60-43.