Case law

Andrews v. Haygood

670 S.E.2d 562 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 2008

670 S.E.2d 562 (2008) ANDREWS v. HAYGOOD. No. 57A07-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 11, 2008. Pamela S. Duffy, Molly A. Orndorff, Burlington, for Charlie Brown, Trustee. Timothy P. Lehan, Raleigh, Robert M.

Hood Ex Rel. Bank of Summerfield v. Simpson

206 N.C. 748 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1934

C., 281 (285); Graves v. Howard, 159 N. C., 594 ; House v. Parker, 181 N. C., 40 (42); Ryan v. Reynolds, 190 N. C., 563 (565); Hughes v. Lassiter, 193 N. C., 651 (657); Monger v. Lutterloh, 195 N. … In Brick Co. v. Gentry, 191 N. C., 636 (640), it is said: “It was held in Ingold’s case (Ingold v. Hickory, 178 N.

Graham v. . O'Bryan

120 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 700 ; Lony v. Ins. Co., 114 N. C., 465 . But nothing in tbe record shows either that tbe defendants were non-residents or any *465 publication made or any attachment. … Hussey v. Kirkman, 95 N. C., 63 ; Moore v. Garner, 101 N. C., 374 ; Hobbs v. Barefoot, 104 N. C., 224 .

Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.

234 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1951

Maddox v. Brown, 233 N.C. 519 , top p. 521, 64 S.E. 2d 864 . … Maddox v. Brown, supra. 2.

Commissioners of Wake County v. Magnin

86 N.C. 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1882

The cases cited in the argument of counsel for the appellants, State v. McIntosh, 9 Ired., 307 , and State v. Woodside, Ib., 496, which were actions upon the sheriff’s bond, and Little v. … State v. Pool, 5 Ired., 105 ; State v. McMinn, 7 Ired., 344 ; State v. Jones, Ib., 359; Bat. Rev., ch. 80, § 16.

Morrow v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Co.

134 N.C. 92 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1903

See also Denny v. Railroad, 132 N. C., 340 , and Gordon v. Railroad 132 N. C., 565 . … Burgin v. Railroad, supra.

Myers v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

166 N.C. 233 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1914

We do not intend in any way to impinge upon tbe well-established princixole laid down in Lambeth v. R. R., 66 N. C., 495 ; Burgin v. R. R., 115 N. … tbe train, and reprimanded him for not boarding tbe preceding train.

Peele v. Powell

156 N.C. 553 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1911

Browne Stat. Frauds, sec. 166. Whether oral or in writing, it must have a consideration to support it (Draughon v. Bunting, 31 N. C., 10 ; Stanly v. Hendrix, 35 N. C., 87 ; Combs v. Harshaw, 63 N. C., 198 ; Haun v. … Browne Stat. Frauds, sec. 197; Horne v. Bank, 108 N. C., 119 . So is a promise, made after the debt is created, when by reason of the promise the original debtor is released (Sheppard v. Newton, 139 N.

Langley v. Patrick

238 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1953

The plaintiff concedes in this Court that the judgment as of nonsuit was properly entered as to the Beaufort County ABC Board. … In fact, the instrument is not executed by Patrick or any of the covered employees of the Board.

Batch v. Town of Chapel Hill

326 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 18, 1990

indicated that some staff and advisory board members wanted Dr. … See Liles v. City of Gresham, 66 Or. App. 59 , 672 P.2d 1229 (1983); Board of Cty. Com’rs, Etc. v. Gaster, 285 Md. 233 , 401 A.2d 666 (1979); Seal v. Mapleton City, 598 P.2d 1346 (Utah 1979).

Ridley v. Railroad

124 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1899

Austin v. King, 97 N. C., 339 ; Pasley v. Richardson, 119 N. C., 449 ; Barnhardt v. Brown, 122 N. C., 587 ; 1 Greenleaf Ev., section 493. … Daniels v. Fowler, 123 N. C., 35 ; Flint v. Flint, 6 Allen (Mass), 34; Kanarson v. Henry, 101 Mass., 152 . On the issue as to permanent damages let there be a new trial. New trial.

State v. Watkins

318 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1986

State v. Brown, 308 N.C. 181 , 301 S.E. 2d 89 (1983). Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. State v. … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E. 2d 585 (1984). N.C.G.S. § 14-27.1(4) requires only slight penetration of the genital opening.

McGlawhorn v. . Worthington

98 N.C. 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 ; Wharton v. Eborn, 88 N. C., 344. "We are also of opinion that the objection to the special proceedings put in evidence cannot be sustained. … Besides, such irregularities seem to be cured by the statute (The Code, §387), Gay v. Stancil, 92 N. C., 455, 464 ; Fowler v. Poor, 93 N. C., 466 ; Hare v. Holloman, 94 N. C., 14 ; Ward v. Lowndes, 96 N. C., 376 .

Whitley v. . Powell

191 N.C. 476 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1926

Kornegay v. Spicer, 76 N. C., 96 ; Shew v. Call, 119 N. C., 453 ; Fleming v. Barden, 127 N. C., 217 ; Ferebee v. Sawyer, 167 N. C., 201 ; Banking Co. v. Leach, 169 N. C., 706 ; Brewington v. Hargrove, 178 N. … C., 146 ; Harvey v. Brown, 187 N. C., 365 ; Brown v. Jennings, 188 N. C., 160 ; Douglas v. Rhodes, ibid., 584.

Mann v. Baker.

142 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1906

Brown v. McKee, 108 N. C., 387 . … It is the 'duty of an administrator d.b.n. to investigate and collect in all sums due the estate, whether by the former administrator, Latham v. Bell, 69 N. C., 135 ; Smith v. Brown, 99 N. C., 377 , or by other debtors.

Jeffreys v. . Jeffreys

213 N.C. 531 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1938

Cahoon v. Brinkley, 176 N. C., 5 ; Gaster v. Thomas, 188 N. C., 346 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 207 N. C., 132 .

Wilson v. Town of Mooresville

222 N.C. 283 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1942

Chambers v. Oil Co., 199 N. C., 28 , 153 S. E., 594 ; Harden v. Furniture Co., supra; Canter v. Board of Education, 201 N. C., 836 , 160 S. E., 924 ; Walker v. Wilkins, Inc., 212 N. C., 627 , 194 S. E., 89 ; Plemmons v. … of commissioners as the board may direct . . .”

Shaver v. . Huntley

107 N.C. 623 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

County Board of Education v. State Board of Education, 106 N. C., 81 , and cases there cited. … We think that this case is clearly distinguishable from County Board of Education v. State Board of Education .

State v. . Chester

172 N.C. 946 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 29, 1916

Counsel for defendant contended tbat tbe wife was not competent to prove tbe fact of marriage, and relied on S. v. Brown, 67 N. … This change in the form of expression was doubtless made to meet the decision in the Brown case, but whether so or not, the language is broad enough to fully warrant the construction that it was intended to make the wife

Harrington v. . King

117 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

It is also agreed that plaintiff tendered his official bonds in due time, and that the Board of County Commissioners refused to accept said bonds and induct plaintiff into office on the ground that said bonds were insufficient … Buckman v. Commrs., 80 N. C., 121 , and authorities cited. In Gatling v. Boone, 98 N. C., 573 , the question was which party was elected, according to the returns, and no material feature of the present case was in it.