Case law

Ridley v. Railroad

124 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1899

Austin v. King, 97 N. C., 339 ; Pasley v. Richardson, 119 N. C., 449 ; Barnhardt v. Brown, 122 N. C., 587 ; 1 Greenleaf Ev., section 493. … Daniels v. Fowler, 123 N. C., 35 ; Flint v. Flint, 6 Allen (Mass), 34; Kanarson v. Henry, 101 Mass., 152 . On the issue as to permanent damages let there be a new trial. New trial.

State v. . Lee

114 N.C. 844 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

State v. Johnson, 50 N. C., 221 ; State v. Brown, 95 N. C., 685 ; State v. McNeill, 93 N. C., 552 . Ás the second count is unquestionably good it is immaterial to consider whether the first count was good or not. … State v. Edwards, 113 N. C., 653 ; State v. Toole, 106 N. C., 736 .

Madison County v. . Coxe

204 N.C. 58 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Holmes Electric Co. v. Power Co., 197 N. C., 766 . Colvard v. Dicus, 198 N. C., 270 ; Morris v. Y. & B. Corporation, 198 N. C., at p. 708 ; Chandler v. Conabeer, 198 N. C., at p. 758 ; Roebuck v. Surety Co., 200 N. … By the chairman of the board of commissioners. He alone is charged with the duty of entering upon the tax list property not given in by the owner or his agent. Act 1923, sec. 75; Rexford v. Phillips, supra.

Williams v. . Williams

175 N.C. 160 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1918

Campbell v. McArthur , 9 N.C. 38 ; Kea v. Robeson , 40 N.C. 373 ; Rowland v. Rowland , 93 N.C. 214 ; Gudger v. White , 141 N.C. 507 ; Triplett v. Williams , 149 N.C. 394 ; Beacon v. Amos , 161 N.C. 357 ; Brown v. … Brown , 168 N.C. 4 ; Gold Mining Co. v. Lumber Co. , 170 N.C. 273 . We said in Brown v.

McGlawhorn v. . Worthington

98 N.C. 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 ; Wharton v. Eborn, 88 N. C., 344. "We are also of opinion that the objection to the special proceedings put in evidence cannot be sustained. … Besides, such irregularities seem to be cured by the statute (The Code, §387), Gay v. Stancil, 92 N. C., 455, 464 ; Fowler v. Poor, 93 N. C., 466 ; Hare v. Holloman, 94 N. C., 14 ; Ward v. Lowndes, 96 N. C., 376 .

Weaver v. . Hampton

204 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Weaver v. Hampton, 201 N. C., 798 . … Tbe Circuit Court of Appeals for tbe Fourth Circuit in Board of Commis *45 sioners v. Tollman, 145 Fed., 753 , recognized and sanctioned tbe right of county commissioners to compromise law suits.

White v. White

179 N.C. 592 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1920

Hoke, J., Vicie v. Flournoy, 147 N. C., 213 ; Graham v. O’Bryan, 120 N. C., 463 . In Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. … As said in Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N.

Godwin v. Murchison National Bank

145 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1907

Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 ; Williams v. Chapman, 118 N. C., 943 ; Chemical Co. v. McNair, 139 N. C., 326 ; Nelson v. Edwards, 40 Barbour, 283. … Walker v. Brown. 165 U. S., 655; Hauseet v. Harrison, 105 U. S., 401 ; Union Trust Co. v. Bulkely, 150 Fed., 510 ; In re J. F. Grandy & Son, 146 Fed., 318 ; Wilder v. Watts, 138 Fed., *328 436 ; Sabin v.

Flowers v. City of Charlotte

195 N.C. 599 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1928

The judgment must be affirmed, upon the authority of Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N. … In Charlotte v. Brown, supra, it is said: “The fact that the lot is a corner lot, and is in two improvement districts, is immaterial.

Rowland v. Old Dominion Building & Loan Ass'n

115 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

It organized a branch of its business at Henderson, in this State, and there had what is styled a “ local board ” of officers or managers. … It was said by that Court, in the case of White v.

Mercer v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

154 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1911

Justice Brown, in Avery v. Lumber Co., 146 N. … Marks v. Cotton Mills, 135 N. C., 287 ; Nail v. Brown, 150 N.

Huyck Corp. v. Town of Wake Forest

321 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988

Brown, Jr. and wife, Emma Brown; Russell S. Finch and wife, Anne C. Finch; Richard E. Hailey and wife, Becky Hailey; Jerry W. Laws and wife, Pat Laws; James L. Davis and wife, Mrs. James L. Davis; James L. … Pendergrass v. TOWN OF WAKE FOREST. No. 320PA87. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 3, 1988. *140 I. Beverly Lake and Jane P. Harris, Wake Forest, for petitioners-appellants.

Warren v. . Short

119 N.C. 39 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Upon this principle, as well as upon the reason of the thing, it was held in Whitted v. … Williams v. Chapman, 118 N. C., 943 ; Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 ; Loftin v. Hines, 107 N. C., 360 .

Mullen v. Town of Louisburg

225 N.C. 53 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1945

Joyner v. Stancill, 108 N. C., 153 ; Hawkins v. Cedar Works, 122 N. C., 87 ; Sturtevant v. Cotton Mills, 171 N. C., 119 , 87 S. E., 992 ; Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 ; Wilson v. … Jur., 175 ; Pue v. Hood, 222 N. C., 310 , 22 S. E. (2d), 561 ; Lee v. Waynesville, 184 N. C., 565 , 115 S. E., 51 ; Pickler v. Board, 149 N. C., 221 ; Crotts v. Winston-Salem, 170 N. C., 24 , 86 S. E., 792 .

Webb v. . Friedberg

189 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1925

Hanley v. Donoghue, *172 116 U. S., 1 ; Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall., 457 ; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S., 14 ; Haddock v. Haddock, 201 U. S., 562 ; Const. of U. S., Anno., 1923, p. 478 et seq. “By virtue of Const., U. … Marsh v. R. R., 151 N. C., 160 ; Miller v. Leach, 95 N. C., 229 . The “warehouse receipts” were under our statute made negotiable. C. S., 4077 el seq.

Hinton v. Cline

238 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1953

McClamroch v. Ice Co., 217 N.C. 106 , 6 S.E. 2d 850 ; Johnston v. Johnston, 213 N.C. 255 , 195 S.E. 807 ; Waller v. Hipp, 208 N.C. 117 , 179 S.E. 428 ; Blum v. R. R., 187 N.C. 640 , 122 S.E. 562 ; Hoke v. … Collins, 125 N.C. 83 , 34 S.E. 242 , 47 L.R.A. 33 ; Benton v. Railroad, 122 N.C. 1007 , 30 S.E. 333 ; Norton v. Railroad, 122 N.C. 910 , 29 S.E. 886 ; Goodson v. Mullin and Derr, 92 N.C. 211 ; Brown v.

INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Sechrist

365 N.C. 200 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2011

710 S.E.2d 13 (2011) INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Jane Elizabeth SECHRIST, Justin Paul Fryar, Paul S. Fryar, and North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. No. 85P11. … David Brown, for N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. Torin L. Fury, Greensboro, for Integon National Insurance Company.

Parsons v. . Wright

223 N.C. 520 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1943

McGrew v. Stewart, 32 Pac., 896 ; Board of Com’rs v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 132 N. W., 675 . This authority extends to alleys as a part of the system of streets. C. S., 2787 (11). … J., 160, sec. 2278; Board of Com’rs v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., supra.

Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.

234 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1951

Maddox v. Brown, 233 N.C. 519 , top p. 521, 64 S.E. 2d 864 . … Maddox v. Brown, supra. 2.

Wolfe v. Pearson

114 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1894

In Zottman v. … State v. Long, 94 N. C., 896 . It was broadly stated in State v.