Case law

Templeton v. . Beard

159 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 24, 1912

Hudson v. McArthur, 152 N. C., 107 ; Raysford v. Phelps, 43 Mich., 342 ; Baker v. State, 27 Ind., 485 ; 28 Cyc., 466. … Staton v. Wimberly, supra; Bray v. Barnard, 109 N. C., 44 ; Bray v. Creekmore, 109 N. C., 49 .

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Nos. 09-013, 09-018 & 09-029 Belk

364 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2010

To satisfy the standard for recusal, the moving party must “ ‘demonstrate objectively that grounds for disqualification actually exist.’ ” State v. … Respondent violated Canons 1, 2A, and 5C(2) by failing to resign from the Sonic Board and by intentionally misrepresenting the reasons for his continued membership on the board during the Commission’s investigation.

Harrington v. . King

117 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

It is also agreed that plaintiff tendered his official bonds in due time, and that the Board of County Commissioners refused to accept said bonds and induct plaintiff into office on the ground that said bonds were insufficient … Buckman v. Commrs., 80 N. C., 121 , and authorities cited. In Gatling v. Boone, 98 N. C., 573 , the question was which party was elected, according to the returns, and no material feature of the present case was in it.

Stokes v. Smith

246 N.C. 694 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1957

Trust Co. v. McDearman, *700 213 N.C. 141 , 195 S.E. 531 ; Fulp v. Brown, 153 N.C. 531 , 69 S.E. 612 ; Shields v. Allen, 77 N.C. 375 ; Hinsdale v. Williams, 75 N.C. 430 . … Brown, supra; Crouch v. Crouch, 160 N.C. 447 , 76 S.E. 482 ; Brown v. Harding, 171 N.C. 686 , 89 S.E. 222 ; Cheek v. Walden, 195 N.C. 752 , 143 S.E. 465 ; Miller v. Little, 212 N.C. 612 , 194 S.E. 92 ; Cleve v.

State v. McLean

121 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

In State v. Smith, 93 N. … State v. Voight, 90 N. C., 741 . To the like effect are the decisions in State v. Kittelle, 110 N. C., 560 ; State v. Downs, 116 N. C., 1064 ; State v. Chisenhall, 106 N. C., 676 ; State v. Scoggins, 107 N. C., 959 .

State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

289 N.C. 286 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1976

Parent-Teacher Association v. Board of Education, 275 N.C. 675 , 170 S.E. 2d 473 (1969). Cf. Crew v. Thompson, 266 N.C. 476 , 146 S.E. 2d 471 (1966); Cochran v. Rowe, 225 N.C. 645 , 36 S.E. 2d 75 (1945). … Parent-Teacher Association v. Board of Education, supra.

State v. . Dunlap

208 N.C. 432 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1935

S. v. Williams, ante, 352; S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747 , 175 S. E., 116 . … S. v. Williams, supra; S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610 , 172 S. E., 219 .

Merrell v. Jenkins

242 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1955

Heath v. Mfg. Co., 242 N.C. 215 , 87 S.E. 2d 300 ; Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547 , 80 S.E. 2d 467 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 . … Smith v. Davis, 228 N.C. 172 , 45 S.E. 2d 51 ; Manufacturing Co. v. Arnold, 228 N.C. 375 , 45 S.E. 2d 577 ; Burnsville v. Boone, supra ( 231 N.C. 577 ). The obiter statement contra appearing in Blades v.

Butler v. Armour Fertilizer Works

193 N.C. 632 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1927

It is not relieved of such liability because its employee who selected the board and constructed the scaffold was a fellow-servant of plaintiff. Barkley v. Waste Co., 147 N. C., 585 . In Fowler v. Conduit Co., 192 N. … Hays v. R. R., 143 N. C., 128 ; Dorsett v. Mfg. Co., 131 N. C., 259 ; Bean v. R. R., 107 N. C., 746 .” In Styron v. R. R., 161 N.

State v. . Reynolds

95 N.C. 616 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

Trespass to realty consists in a wrongful and unwarrantable entry upon the land of another, which the law entitles a trespass by “breaking his close,” (Brown on Real Property, 777), and possession is necessary to the maintenance … McCormick v. Monroe, 1 Jones, 13 . But this possession has no existence when there is another in adverse possession. Dobbs v. Gullidge, 4 D. & B., 68.

Evans v. Commissioners of Cumberland

89 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1883

shall certify the same to the chairman of the board of justices of said county within five days of said meeting, and the chairman of the said board of justices shall call a joint meeting *156 of the justices and commissioners … Manly v. City of Raleigh, 4 Jones’ Eq., 370; Newsom v. Earnheart, 86 N. C., 39 ; Hill v. Commissioners of Forsyth, 67 N. C., 367 .

Wally v. City of Kannapolis

365 N.C. 449 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 2012

On a separate issue, the Court of Appeals, relying upon Blades v. … By its plain language section 160A-383 states that when the governing board adopts a zoning amendment, the board “shall also” approve a statement. Id.

State ex rel. Howerton v. Tate

70 N.C. 161 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1874

But during this whole period, Howerton and his Board were ¡kept out of possession by the defendant Tate and his Board, ¡and this action is for the purpose of lecovering the salary to which Howerton alleges he is entitled … P. 81; Lightly v, Clouston, 1 Taunt. 112 , Allen v. McKean, 1 Sumner 276; Bayton v. Dodsworth, 6 Term R. 681; Dorsey v. Smythe County Auditor, 28 Cal. 21 .”

In re Perquimans County Drainage District No. Four

254 N.C. 155 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1961

Newton v. Chason, 225 N.C., 204 , 34 S.E. (2d), 70 .” In Staton v. … Collins v. Highway Commission, supra.

North Carolina State Bar v. Talford

356 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 2003

State Bar v. … Comm’r of Ins. v. N.C. Fire Ins.

Green v. Briggs

243 N.C. 745 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1956

Austin v. Dare County, 240 N.C. 662 , 83 S.E. 2d 702 ; Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 233 N.C. 644 , 65 S.E. 2d 137 ; Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578 , 61 S.E. 2d 607 ; Penland v. … the defendant Board, citing Ferguson v.

Cobb v. TOWN OF BLOWING ROCK

718 S.E.2d 373 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 2011

718 S.E.2d 373 (2011) COBB, et al. v. TOWN OF BLOWING ROCK, et al. No. 300A11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 19, 2011. R. Kent Brown, Charlotte, for Cobb, Chelsea Amanda Brooke, et al. Andrew J.

State v. Grier

268 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1966

In S. v. … G.S. 15-41; S. v. Brown, 264 N.C. 191 .” In this case the arresting officer knew that a robbery had been committed by one who had fled.

Houck v. . Adams

98 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

Campbell v. Brown, 86 N. C., 376 , and the cases there cited. … Perry v. Jackson, 88 N. C., 103 ; McDonald v. Carson, 94 N. C., 497 .

People Ex Rel. Nichols v. McKee

68 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

It has already been said in two cases in this Court, Clarke v. Stanly, 66 N. C. R. and Holden v. University Railroad, 63 N. C. … We assume that the General Assembly had some sufficient reason for changing the name of the Board, but it left the Board, the office, to be filled by officers.