Case law

State Ex Rel. Summrell v. Carolina-Virginia Racing Ass'n

239 N.C. 591 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1954

Carpenter v. Boyles, 213 N.C. 432 , 196 S.E. 850 ; Barker v. Palmer, 217 N.C. 519 , 8 S.E. 2d 610 . … It is to be noted that the plaintiff in Amick v. Lancaster, supra, sought to enjoin the operations of a governmental board acting “under color of legislative authority.”

Town of Williamston v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

236 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1952

Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N.C. 669 , 155 S.E. 562 . … Board of Education, 214 N.C. 89 , 197 S.E. 752 ; Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N.C. 669 , 155 S.E. 562 .

State v. Braxton

352 N.C. 158 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 2000

Brown, Jr. escorted the victim, who had been confined to his cell on administrative lockup, to the shower. Officer Brown searched the victim and the shower area and found no contraband or weapons. … See State v. Leroux, 326 *175 N.C. 368, 378, 390 S.E.2d 314, 322 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 871 , 112 L. Ed. 2d 155 (1990); State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 192 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 11 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.

State v. Cummings

346 N.C. 291 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1997

to be a part of the process of imposing the death penalty, (2) Brown knew an individual with whom the State was familiar, (3) Brown knew an individual who was involved in a drug-related shooting, (4) Brown had a friend with … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 61 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 824 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1164 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986), overruled on other grounds by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988).

In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Nos. 09-013, 09-018 & 09-029 Belk

364 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2010

To satisfy the standard for recusal, the moving party must “ ‘demonstrate objectively that grounds for disqualification actually exist.’ ” State v. … Respondent violated Canons 1, 2A, and 5C(2) by failing to resign from the Sonic Board and by intentionally misrepresenting the reasons for his continued membership on the board during the Commission’s investigation.

State v. . Dunlap

208 N.C. 432 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1935

S. v. Williams, ante, 352; S. v. Brown, 206 N. C., 747 , 175 S. E., 116 . … S. v. Williams, supra; S. v. Johnson, 205 N. C., 610 , 172 S. E., 219 .

Butler v. Armour Fertilizer Works

193 N.C. 632 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1927

It is not relieved of such liability because its employee who selected the board and constructed the scaffold was a fellow-servant of plaintiff. Barkley v. Waste Co., 147 N. C., 585 . In Fowler v. Conduit Co., 192 N. … Hays v. R. R., 143 N. C., 128 ; Dorsett v. Mfg. Co., 131 N. C., 259 ; Bean v. R. R., 107 N. C., 746 .” In Styron v. R. R., 161 N.

State v. Wilson

121 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

State v. Younger, 12 N. C., 357 ; 2 McClain, supra, § 959. State v. Brown, 119 N. … State v. Harris, 120 N. C., 577 , citing State v. Kiger, 115 N. C., 746 ; State, v. Hart, 116 N. C., 976 ; Holden v. Strickland, 116 N. C., 185 ; Sutton v. Walters, 118 N. C., 495 ; Riley v.

Ledford v. Emerson.

138 N.C. 502 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1905

Brown, J. … Carden v. McConnell, 116 N. C., 875 ; Pollock v. Wilcox, 68 N. C., 50 ; Reynolds v. Magness, 24 N. C., 26 ; 1 Greenleaf Ev., 275-279.

State v. . Hargrave

97 N.C. 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

Brown, they would have been inadmissible as evidence; certainly the exclamation of the son would be equally as inadmissible. … McIntosh, 4 Jones, 434 ; State v. Harris, 63 N. C., 1 ; 1 Greenleaf Ev., §§102, 124, 125, 162. There is error, and the prisoner is entitled to a new trial. Let this be certified, and a venire de novo awarded. Error.

Wilson v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.

230 N.C. 551 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1949

To the same effect are the holdings in Tyson. v. Ford, supra; Cox v. Lee, supra; and Brown v. Bus Lines, supra. Moreover, in Tyson v. … To like effect are these later cases: Bus Co. v. Products Co., supra; Cox v. Lee, supra; and Brown v. Bus Lines, supra.

Chatham v. C. C. Disher Chevrolet Co.

215 N.C. 88 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1939

Ledford v. Emerson, 138 N. C., 502 , 51 S. E., 42 ; Mahoney v. Osborne, 189 N. C., 445 , 127 S. E., 533 ; Chair Co. v. Crawford, 193 N. C., 531 , 137 S. E., 577 . … “The rule excluding parol evidence as to the contents of a written instrument applies only in actions between parties to the writing and when its enforcement is the substantive cause of action,” Brown, J., in Ledford v.

Houck v. . Adams

98 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1887

Campbell v. Brown, 86 N. C., 376 , and the cases there cited. … Perry v. Jackson, 88 N. C., 103 ; McDonald v. Carson, 94 N. C., 497 .

Bray v. . Creekmore

109 N.C. 49 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 ; Maggett v. Roberts, 108 N. C., 174 . In both these cases the amendment was identical with that here objected to. 2. … If the amended summons adds a new defendant, it must be served on such defendant (Plemmons v. Improvement Co., 108 N.

State v. Grier

268 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1966

In S. v. … G.S. 15-41; S. v. Brown, 264 N.C. 191 .” In this case the arresting officer knew that a robbery had been committed by one who had fled.

State v. . Lee

114 N.C. 844 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

State v. Johnson, 50 N. C., 221 ; State v. Brown, 95 N. C., 685 ; State v. McNeill, 93 N. C., 552 . Ás the second count is unquestionably good it is immaterial to consider whether the first count was good or not. … State v. Edwards, 113 N. C., 653 ; State v. Toole, 106 N. C., 736 .

Haymore v. Commissioners of Yadkin

85 N.C. 268 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1881

So far as regards the plaintiff’s first cause of action, the case seems to be parallel with that of Daniel v. Commissioners of Edgecombe, 74 N. C., 494 . … Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C., 93 ; Kendall v. The United States, 12 Peters, 524 ; Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Dennison, 24 How., 66 . Error- Reversed and venire de novos

Shorts v. THE MEGA FORCE STAFFING GROUP

363 N.C. 807 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2010

691 S.E.2d 21 (2010) Daniel SHORTS, Employee, Plaintiff, v. THE MEGA FORCE STAFFING GROUP, Employer, American Home Assurance Company, Carrier, Defendants. No. 504P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2010. … Brown, Jr., Greensboro, for Daniel Shorts.

Bryant Timber Co. v. Wilson

151 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1909

Brown, J. … Collingwood v. Brown, 106 N. C., 365 ; Spencer v. Credle, 102 N. C., 78 ; Todd v. Outlaw, 79 N. C., 235; Badger v. Daniel, 77 N. C., 251 .

Montgomery v. Carolina & N. W. Railroad

163 N.C. 597 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1913

R. v. Brown, 229 U. S., 311 , citing R. R. v. U. S., 220 U. S., 559 . *599 In Nichols v. R. … R. v. Brown, 229 U.