Case law

Finch v. Commissioners of Nash County

190 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1925

Cooper v. Comrs., 184 N. C., 615 . In S. v. Butner, 185 N. … As already stated, tbe action is to enjoin tbe defendant, board of education, from consolidating certain school districts, and to restrain tbe county board of commissioners from levying taxes to carry on tbe schools in said

State v. . Baker

83 N.C. 649 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

The form adopted in this case, we believe, is that in common use in this state, and is indirectly sanctioned in State v. Woody, 2 Jones, 335 . … State v. Brown, 82 N. C., 585 . The motion in arrest of judgment was properly overruled. This will be certified. Per Curiam. No error.

People's National Bank of Fayetteville v. McKethan

84 N.C. 582 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1881

This entry of the action of the board of directors was introduced as tending to show: 1. … May v. Gentry, 4. Dev. & Bat., 117.

State v. Cornell

281 N.C. 20 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1972

State v. Ray, 274 N.C. 556 , 164 S.E. 2d 457 ; State v. Wright, 274 N.C. 380, 163 S.E. 2d *31 897; State v. Brown, 271 N.C. 250 , 156 S.E. 2d 272 ; State v. Lowry and State v. … State v. Yoes and Hale v. State, 271 N.C. 616 , 157 S.E. *32 2d 386; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 379 , 97 L.ed. 469; State v.

State v. . Gillikin

114 N.C. 832 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

His assignment to any particular road rested with the Board of Supervisors of the township. The Code, §2016. There is nothing tending to show that such Board acted fraudulently, oppressively or beyond their powers. … This was brought to the attention of the Court in State v. Ewing, 108 N.

Denson v. Davis

256 N.C. 658 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1962

Clarence Brown, a V-C Fertilizer dealer in Tarboro bid in the property. Mr. Brown was an agent of V-C at the time he bid in the property. … Brown is a peanut dealer in Tarboro and sells V-C fertilizer. He buys fertilizer from us and sells it. He is not a subordinate of mine. He was buying for the Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corporation at this sale.

Felmet v. . Commissioners

186 N.C. 251 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1923

22 of the general act, merely requires a petition of the board of education. … Board of Education v. Bray, 184 N. C., 484 ; Wilson v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 638 ; Comrs. v. Malone, 179 N. C., 110 . Affirmed.

State v. Tenore

280 N.C. 238 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 14, 1972

Accord: State v. Dannenberg, 150 N.C. 799 , 63 S.E. 946 ; State v. Langston, 88 N.C. 692 . In State v. … In State v.

Spinks v. . Ferebee, Mayor

193 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1927

It was said, in speaking to the question in Sewing Machine Co. v. Burger, 181 N. … Jones v. Mial, 82 N. C., at p. 257; Ricks v. Brooks, 179 N. C., p. 204; Killian v. Hanna, ante, p. 17; S. v. McCanless, ante, 200. In this Court we cannot pass on the facts.

State v. . Patrick

79 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1878

In State v. … We cite the following cases merely as a reference to the several phases in which the question of description of stolen property has been considered': State v. Brown, 1 Dev. 137; State v. Godet, 7 Ire. 210; State v.

Ducker v. . Venable

126 N.C. 447 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1900

County Board of Education v. State Board of Education, 106 N. C., 81 ; Rogers v. Jenkins, 98 N. C., 129 , cases cited by defendant; High on Extraordinary Remedies, sec. 353; Marbrey v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 49 ; Kendall v. … The defendant relies on County Board, etc., v. State Board, etc., and Rogers v. Jenhins, supra. We do not think these eases sustain his contention, but are authority for the plaintiff.

Smith v. . Ritch

196 N.C. 72 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1928

I set the nail in the board. Mr. Thompson was sawing the boards and pushing them up to me. … Thompson, his helper, was sawing the boards and pushing them up to him. He started the nail in the board and pushed the board in place, and reached out to nail it with his other hand.

Justice v. . Asheville

161 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1912

In Paulsen v. … It was also said in Raleigh v.

Revis v. . Ramsey

202 N.C. 815 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1932

Wellons v. Lassiter, 200 N. C., 474 , 157 S. E., 434 ; Phillips v. Ray, 190 N. C., 152 , 129 S. E., 177 ; Dockery v. Fairbanks, 172 N. C., 529 , 90 S. E., 501 ; May v. Lumber Co., 119 N. C., 96 , 25 S. … E., 721 ; Henry v. Hilliard, 120 N. C., 479 , 27 S. E., 130 ; Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 ; S. v. Evans, 74 N. C., 324 . Tbe motion made at tbe February Term is different from tbe one lodged at tbe October Term.

Bigham v. . Foor

201 N.C. 14 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1931

Brann v. Hanes, 194 N. C., 571 , 140 S. E., 292 ; Gower v. Carter, 195 N. C., 697 , 143 S. E., 513 ; S. v. Carter, 194 N. C., 293 , 139 S. E., 604 ; Roanoke Rapids v. Patterson, 184 N. C., 135 , 113 S. … E., 603 ; Hannon v. Grizzard, 89 N. C., 115 . The constitutionality of chapter 75, Public Laws 1929, was upheld in Ashley v. Brown, 198 N. C., 369 , 151 S. E., 725 . The case of White v. Lumber Co., 199 N.

Windsor Bargain House v. Watson

148 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1908

In Brown v. Brown, 109 N. C., 124 , the ’Court held: “1. … And in Thigpen v. Maget, 107 N.

Dennis v. City of Albemarle

242 N.C. 263 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1955

Defendant contends that delivery to the City Clerk was not presentation to the Board of Commissioners, citing Nevins v. Lexington, supra. We need not consider whether this, standing alone, would be sufficient. … Ivester v. Winston-Salem, 215 N.C. 1 , 1 S.E. 2d 88 ; Perry v. High Point, 218 N.C. 714 , 12 S.E. 2d 275 .

Harvell v. . Lumber Co.

154 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1911

The board was shown to the jury, and a witness for defendant testified: "There were thicker boards at the mill. Board is not strong enough to hold the weight." … R. v. Ives , 144 U.S. 408 ; Norton v. R. R. , 122 N.C. 929 . In Russell v.

Estate of Williams Ex Rel. Overton v. Pasquotank County Parks & Recreation Department

718 S.E.2d 381 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 2011

718 S.E.2d 381 (2011) ESTATE OF Erik Dominic WILLIAMS, by and through Easter Williams OVERTON, Personal, Representative v. PASQUOTANK COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT and Pasquotank County. No. 231PA11. … School Boards Association. Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney, for Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County. Michael C. Frue, Asheville, for Buncombe County. Leon M. Killian, III, Raleigh, for Haywood County.

Williamson v. Snow

239 N.C. 493 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1954

Coastal Highway v. Turnpike Authority, 237 N.C. 52 , 74 S.E. 2d 310 ; Pue v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 222 N.C. 310 , 22 S.E. 2d 896 ; Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 219 N.C. 96 , 12 S.E. 2d 889 ; Cox v. … Kinston, 217 N.C. 391 , 8 S.E. 2d 252 ; Meador v. Thomas, 205 N.C. 142 , 170 S.E. 110 ; Sanitary District v. Prudden, 195 N.C. 722 , 143 S.E. 530 ; Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N.C. 7 , 128 S.E. 593 ; Field v.