Case law

Bechtel v. . Weaver

202 N.C. 856 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1932

If it be conceded that the defendants’ plea in abatement should have been sustained (Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375 , 160 S. … Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 440 ; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517 , 112 S. E., 32 .

Schmidt v. Bryant

251 N.C. 838 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1960

Brown v. Hobbs, 147 N.C. 73 , 60 S.E. 716 ; Bourne v. Sherrill, 143 N.C. 381 , 55 S.E. 799 , 118 Am. St. Rep. 809 ; Sprague v. Bond, 108 N.C. 382 , 13 S.E. 143 ; Michael v. Foil, 100 N.C. 178 , 6 S.E. 264 ; Brogden v. … Bourne v. Sherrill, supra. In Brown v. Hobbs, supra, this Court quoted with approval from Trowbridge v.

McNeill v. . Hodges

83 N.C. 504 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

To the like effect are Filhour v. Gibson , 4 Ired. Eq., 455 , and Outlaw v. Farmer , 71 N.C. 31 . The cases cited in the brief for the exceptant are not in conflict with those referred to. … Finch v. Ragland , 2 Dev. Eq., 137 .

State v. . Stackhouse

152 N.C. 808 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1910

Brown, J. The prisoner was convicted of the premeditated and deliberate murder of his wife. The killing with a deadly weapon, a shotgun, was admitted. There are no exceptions to the evidence. … S. v. Thomas, 118 N. C., 1113 ; S. v. Dowden, 118 N. C., 1145 ; S. v. Norwood, 115 N. C., 790 ; S. v. Covington, 117 N. C., 834 ; S. v. McCormac, 116 N. C., 1033 .

State v. Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 312A15 Filed 18 March 2016 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. … Brown in Superior Court, Johnston County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 16 February 2016. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Bryan E.

Ponton v. McAdoo

71 N.C. 101 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1874

Heileg v. Stokes, 63 N. C. R., 612; Jarman v. Saunders, 64 N. C. R., 368; Craycroff v. Morehead and wife, 67 N. C. R., 422; Brown, Daniel & Co., v. Hawkins, 65 N. C. R., 645.

McGuinn v. City of High Point

219 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1941

Wilson v. Comrs., 193 N. C., 386 , 137 S. E., 151 ; Berrier v. Comrs., 186 N. C., 564 , 120 S. E., 328 ; United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U. S., 105 ; Annotation, 68 A. L. R., 1180. … S. v. Barksdale,, 181 N. C., 621 , 107 S. E., 505 .

State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.

207 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1934

Payne v. Brown, 205 N. C., 785 , 172 S. E., 348 ; Parles v. Seagraves, *48 203 N. C., 647 , 166 S. E., 747 ; Armstrong v. Service Stores, 203 N. C., 231 , 165 S. E., 680 ; Everett v. Fair Association, 202 N. … Waters v. Waters, supra. We can judicially know only what properly appears on the record. Chesson v. Bank, 190 N. C., 187 , 129 S. E., 403 ; S. v. Wheeler, 185 N. C., 670 , 116 S. E., 413 ; Walton v. McKesson, 101 N.

In Re Bank of Sampson

205 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1933

Brown v. Brittain, 84 N. C., 552 . And if the assignee is himself a debtor of the bank, he will not be allowed to use the assigned claim as a set-off. Comr. of Banks v. White, 202 N. C., 311 , 162 S. E., 736 ; Davis v. … Brown v. Brittain, supra; 7 C. J., 746.

State v. . Hawkins

214 N.C. 326 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1938

An ironing board was near by and a shirt was in her hand. An empty shell recently fired and a shell loaded with No. 6 shot were found by the coroner in the hallway of the house. The defendant was not then at home. … Johnson , 176 N.C. 722 , 97 S.E. 14 , Brown, J. , said: "We might hesitate to admit evidence of threats made two years before the homicide, if they stood alone, although threats made twelve months prior were admitted in S

State v. . Bryant

213 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1938

E., 709 , Brown, J., said: “There is a distinction made by tbe text writers in criminal law which seems to be reasonable and supported by authority, between assaults with felonious intent and assaults without such intent. … S. v. Blackwell, 162 N. C., 672 , 78 S. E., 316 ; S. v. Marshall, 208 N. C., 127 , 179 S. E., 427 ; S. v. Terrell, 212 N. C., 145 , 193 S. E., 161 ; S. v. Robinson, supra; S. v. Mosley, ante, 304, 195 S.

Winkler v. N.C. State Bd. of Plumbing, Heating & Fire Sprinkler Contractors

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2020

WINKLER V. N.C. STATE BD. … . § 6-19.1 because, when read as a whole, the statute excludes cases arising out of the defense of a disciplinary action by a licensing board. Winkler v. N.C.

Bray v. North Carolina Police Voluntary Benefit Ass'n

258 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1963

In Coile v. Com. Travelers, 161 N.C. 104 , 76 S.E. 622 , quoted in Paul v. Ins. Co., 183 N.C. 159, 162 , and in Arrington v. Ins. … Co. v. Eggleston, 26 U.S. 577 ; Ins. Co. v. Norton, 96 U.S., 234 .”

Prevatte v. Prevatte

239 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1953

Anderson v. Worthington, 238 N.C. 577 . The requirements of the statute allowing appeals in forma pauperis are mandatory and failure to comply deprives this Court of any appellate jurisdiction. Williams v. … Tillman, 229 N.C. 434 , 50 S.E. 2d 33 ; Brown v. Kress & Co., 207 N.C. 722 , 178 S.E. 248 . Appeal dismissed.

In re J.R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 2022

Brown, “Anything else?” Dr. … Brown responded that she had nothing more to share with the court. Respondent’s counsel then cross-examined Dr. Brown.

Ragan v. . Ragan

212 N.C. 753 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1938

Wall v. Covington, 83 N. C., 144 ; Strickland v. Strickland, 95 N. C., 471 ; Cook v. Moore, 100 N. C., 294 , 6 S. E., 795 ; Brooks v. Stephens, 100 N. C., 297 , 6 S. E., 81 ; Durham v. Cotton Mills, 144 N. … E., 465 ; S. v. Brown, 203 N. C., 513 , 166 S. E., 396 . On the face of the judgment, the plaintiff is not the party aggrieved— and is not, therefore, entitled to appeal. O. S., 632.

Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. Gibbs

262 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1964

Israel v. R. R., 262 N.C. 83 , 136 S.E. 2d 248 ; Farmer v. Ferris, 260 N.C. 619 , 133 S.E. 2d 492 ; Dumas v. R. R., 253 N.C. 501 , 117 S.E. 2d 426 ; Brown v. Coal Co., 208 N.C. 50 , 178 S.E. 858 ; Lumber Co. v. … Farmer v. Ferris, supra; Lumber Co. v. Finance Co., supra; Brown v. Coal Co., supra; Strong’s N. C. Index, Vol. 1, Appeal and Error, pp. 138-9.

Great American Insurance Company v. Gold

254 N.C. 168 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1961

Buchan v. Shaw, Comr. of Revenue, 238 N.C. 522 , 78 S.E. 2d 317 ; Insurance Co. v. Unemployment Commission, 217 N.C. 495 , 8 S.E. 2d 619 ; O’Neal v. Wake County, 196 N.C. 184 , 145 S.E. 28 ; Rotan v. … An action against a commission or board created by statute as an agency of the State where the interest or rights of the State are directly affected *173 is in fact an action against the State.” Insurance Co. v.

State v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.

676 S.E.2d 53 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 2009

676 S.E.2d 53 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.; R.J. … Reynolds Tobacco Company; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Individually and as successor by merger to The American Tobacco Company; and Lorillard Tobacco Company.

In Re Will of Kestler

228 N.C. 215 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1947

In re Will of Brown, 203 N. C., 347 , 166 S. E., 72 ; Bissett v. Bailey, 176 N. C., 43 , 96 S. E., 648 . At least its admission *217 would not work a new trial according to our previous decisions. … In re Will of Brown, 194 N. C., 583 , 140 S. E., 192 . However, the testimony of Arey Gray, a neighbor, quotes the same declaration of purpose without objection.