Case law

Boles v. Hegler

232 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 1950

Maddox v. Brown, ante, 244; Carruthers v. R. R., ante, 183; Samuels v. Bowers, ante, 149; Cole v. … Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co., 224 N.C. 211 , 29 S.E. 2d 740 ; Nichols v. Goldston, 228 N.C. 514 , 46 S.E. 2d 320 ; *330 Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122 (131), 52 S.E. 2d 377 ; Maddox v. Brown, ante, 244.

King v. . R. R.

200 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1931

The liability of the defendant in this case is governed by the opinion in Earwood v. R. R. , 192 N.C. 27 , 133 S.E. 180 . See, also, McGee v. Warren , 198 N.C. 672 , 153 S.E. 162 ; Smith v. R. … Brown v. Kinsey , 81 N.C. 245 ; Rice v. R. R. , 174 N.C. 268 , 93 S.E. 774 ; Hoggard v. Brown , 192 N.C. 494 , 135 S.E. 331 ; McIntosh North Carolina Practice and Procedure, p. 545.

Johnson v. . Whilden

166 N.C. 104 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S., 714 , and 9 Rose’s notes thereon, pp. 338-39 et seq.; Warlick v. Reynolds, 151 N. C., 606 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 . … S., 316 , Arndt v. Griggs, that being an action to quiet title to realty, and tbe principle bas been frequently recognized and applied in this jurisdiction, as in Bernhardt v. Brown, supra; Vick v. Flournoy, 147 N.

McGuinn v. City of High Point

219 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1941

Wilson v. Comrs., 193 N. C., 386 , 137 S. E., 151 ; Berrier v. Comrs., 186 N. C., 564 , 120 S. E., 328 ; United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U. S., 105 ; Annotation, 68 A. L. R., 1180. … S. v. Barksdale,, 181 N. C., 621 , 107 S. E., 505 .

Donlop v. Snyder

234 N.C. 627 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1951

Bradford v. Cook, supra ( 232 N.C. 699, p. 701 ). See also Maddox v. Brown, 233 N.C. 519 , 64 S.E. 2d 864 , and cases cited. … Fowler v. Atlantic Co., Inc., supra (ante, 542); Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 244, p. 249 , 59 S.E. 2d 791 ; Gladden v. Setzer, 230 N.C. 269 , 52 S.E. 2d 804 ; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122, 52 S.E. 2d 377 ; Bundy v.

Bridger v. . Mitchell

187 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1924

Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S., 714 , and 9 Rose’s Notes tbereon, pp. 338-39, et seq.; Warlick v. Reynolds, 151 N. C., 606 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 701 .” Long v. Insurance Co., 114 N. C., 466 ; Vick v. … The Court said: “As said in Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N.

Harrell v. Midland Bd. of Adjustment

799 S.E.2d 865 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 2017

State v. . Eaves

106 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Brown v. Brown, 108 N. C., 213 . … State v. Moody, 95 N. C., 656 ; State v. Patterson, 98 N. C., 666 . The case of State v. Hampton, 77 N.

Jones v. . Flynt

159 N.C. 87 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1912

Bynum v. Commissioners , 101 N.C. 412 ; Gatling v. Boone , 98 N.C. 573 ; Wallace v. Salisbury , 147 N.C. 58 . … The case of Hart v. R.

Lancaster v. Southern Insurance Co.

153 N.C. 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 1910

Floars v. Insurance Co., 144 N. C., p. 232; Hayes v. Insurance Co., 132 N. C., p. 702; Lasher v. Insurance Co., 86 N. Y., p. 423; Brown v. Insurance Co., 86 Ala, p. 189; Crikelaire v. Insurance Co., 186 Ill., p. 309. … in the recent case of Jordan v.

Matthews v. Fry.

143 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1906

Summerlin v. Cowles, 107 N. C., 462 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 711 . … Branton v. O’Briant, 93 N. C., 103 ; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 118 N. C., 435 ; Walnut v. Wade, 103 U. S., 688 .

In Re Bank of Sampson

205 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1933

Brown v. Brittain, 84 N. C., 552 . And if the assignee is himself a debtor of the bank, he will not be allowed to use the assigned claim as a set-off. Comr. of Banks v. White, 202 N. C., 311 , 162 S. E., 736 ; Davis v. … Brown v. Brittain, supra; 7 C. J., 746.

State v. Simpson

244 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1956

S. v. … S. v. Scates, 50 N.C. 420 ; S. v. Hambright, 111 N.C. 707 , 16 S.E. 411 ; S. v. Medlin, 126 N.C. 1127 , 36 S.E. 344 ; S. v. Everett, 194 N.C. 442 , 140 S.E. 22 .

Lindsay v. . Hogg

41 N.C. 3 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1849

If the testator had simply directed, that his nephew should be educated at his expense, it is settled by the case of Cloud v. Martin, 1 Dev. & Bat. 399—2 Dev. & Bat. … There must be a reference, to ascertain the amount expended for the plaintiff’s board and clothes, during the time he has been boarded out; the amount, that will be necessary for his board, clothes tuition, and books, until

Estate of Williams v. PASQUOTANK COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT

719 S.E.2d 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 2011

719 S.E.2d 30 (2011) ESTATE OF Erik Dominic WILLIAMS v. PASQUOTANK COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT, et al. No. 231PA11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 2, 2011. … School Boards Association. Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney, for Board of Commissioners of New Hanover County. Michael C. Frue, Asheville, for Buncombe County. Leon M. Killian, III, Raleigh, for Haywood County.

Bechtel v. . Weaver

202 N.C. 856 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1932

If it be conceded that the defendants’ plea in abatement should have been sustained (Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375 , 160 S. … Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 440 ; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517 , 112 S. E., 32 .

Person v. . Twitty

28 N.C. 115 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1845

Cowper v. Scott, 1 Pr. Wms. 119. Edwards v. Freeman, 2 Pr. Wms. 440. … Walton v. Walton, 14 Ves. 318. Brown v. Brown, 2 Ired. Eq. 309.

City of Greensboro v. Bishop

197 N.C. 748 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1929

Gunter v. Sanford, 186 N. C., 456 . In Durham v. Proctor, 191 N. … Warren v. Makely, 85 N. C., 12 ; Bruner v. Threadgill, 88 N. C., 361 ; Belding v. Archer, 131 N. C., 287 ; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 .

Godwin v. Vinson

254 N.C. 582 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1961

Brown v. Estates Corp., 239 N.C. 595 , 80 S.E. 2d 645 . … Brown v. Esates Corp., supra.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Cumberland County

223 N.C. 750 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1943

R. v. Lenoir County, supra, that the special approval of the General Assembly may be expressed by a special or a general act, N. C. Const., Art. … rate of tax the boards of commissioners may levy for this purpose.