Case law

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 484 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2006

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2005

Grant v. . Brown

212 N.C. 39 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1937

Warren v. Dail, 170 N. C., 406 , 87 S. E., 126 . To hold otherwise would be to allow the defendant “to have his cake and eat it too.” Young v. Hood, Comr., 209 N. C., 801 , 184 S. E., 823 . … Whitmire v. Ins. Co., 205 N. C., 101 , 170 S. E., 118 . The cause will be remanded for judgment accordant herewith. Modified and affirmed.

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 2005

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2005

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 854 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2005

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 637 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 2005

State v. Brown

360 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 2005

State v. Brown

359 N.C. 854 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 2005

State v. Brown

100 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1888

Bost v. Bost, 87 N. C., 477 ; Perry v. Jackson, 88 N. C., 103 ; Malloy v. Bruden, 86 N. … Of the instructions asked and refused as well as those given, it is only necessary to refer to the cases of State v. Davis, 92 N. C., 764 , and State v. Moody, 98 N.

Cox v. . Brown

27 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1844

Little v. . Brown

126 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1900

Corlyn v. … The cases of Overman v. Sims, 96 N. C., 451 , and Overman v. Tate, 114 N. C., 571 , differ from this.

State v. . Brown

218 N.C. 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1940

This case is governed by the opinion of S. v. Abbott, ante, 470. For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment of the court below in this case is Affirmed.

Brown v. . Miller

108 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

Woodlief v. Harris, 95 N. C., 211 ; Gwathney v. Etheridge, 99 N. C., 571; State v. Logan, 100 N. C., 454 . … Raw lings v. Hunt, 90 N. C., 270 , and cases there cited. The defendants further contend that the bale of cotton in question belonged to Fisher, the landlord, as and for the rent due to him from Patterson.

State v. Price

326 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1990

See, e.g., State v. Brown, 320 N.C. at 202-03, 358 S.E.2d at 17 . See also South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. at —, 104 L. Ed. 2d at 883 . … In California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 542 , 93 L.

Brown v. Long

22 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1838

In Harrison v. Battle, 1 Dev. Eq. Rep. 537 , Chief Justice Henderson observed, when the question of a Pure debt, arises, it will be time enough to consider whether cannot be reached. … Upon views like these the case of Edgell v. Haywood and Dowe, 3 Atk. 352, was determined by Lord Hardwicke, upon one of the insolvent debtors’ acts, called the Lords’ acts, passed 10 Geo.

Brown v. Ellis

362 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 2008

Brown v. Dodson

359 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2004

Defs’ (Stephen Page and Buncombe County Board of Education) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA03-954) 2. Pits’ Motion to Dismiss Petition for Discretionary Review 3. Pits’ Conditional PDR 1. Denied (12/02/04) 2.

State v. Brown

358 N.C. 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 2004

Harvey v. . Brown

187 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1924

Cihak v. Klekr, 117 Ill., 643 ; 7 N. E., 111 ; Manufacturers Bank v. Koch, 105 N. Y., 630 ; 12 N. E., 9 ; 1 Jones Evid., sec. 167; Gardom v. Woodward (Kan.), 21 Am. St. Rep., 314 , note (3. c., 25 Pac., 199 ). … Wigmore on Evidence (2 ed.), sec. 661; Wolf v. Arthur, 112 N. C., 692 ; Stanley v. Lumber Co., 184 N. C., 306 ; S. v. Journegan, 185 N. C., 707.