Case law

Chadwick v. . Insurance Co.

158 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1912

Cureton v. Garrison, 111 N. C., 272 ; Loftis v. Raxter, 66 N. C., 340 ; Wooley v. Robinson, 52 N. C., 30 . These *382 cases have been cited and approved, Sitton v. Lumber Co., 135 N. … In Brown v. R. R., 140 N.

Smith v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

364 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2010

705 S.E.2d 360 (2010) Phyllis Dianne SMITH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. … TEACHERS' AND STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board of Trustees of the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; Department of State Treasurer, Retirement Systems Division

Farmer v. . Willard

71 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Hubbard v. Troy, 2 Ired., 134 . It was objected that the plaintiff could not recover the value of the land, because there was no note or memorandum in writing, given by the party to be charged. … Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C., 554 , and subsequent cases. The consideration of the bill was land, and the jury, by their verdict, have ascertained its value in the present currency. There is no error. Pee Cueiam.

Matthews v. Fry.

143 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1906

Summerlin v. Cowles, 107 N. C., 462 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 711 . … Branton v. O’Briant, 93 N. C., 103 ; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 118 N. C., 435 ; Walnut v. Wade, 103 U. S., 688 .

Wilkins v. Warren

250 N.C. 217 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959

To like effect: 86 C.J.S., Theaters & Shows § 41; Hiatt v. Ritter, 223 N.C. 262 , 25 S.E. 2d 756 ; Hahn v. … In Hiatt v.

Paschall v. . Bullock

80 N.C. 8 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

Utley v. Foy, 70 N. C., 303 ; Brumble v. Brown, 71 N. C., 513 : State v. Powell, 74 N. C., 270 ; Green v. Castleberry, 77 N. C., 164 . There is no error and the judgment is affirmed.

Bowie v. Town of West Jefferson

231 N.C. 408 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1950

Where the town board got authority to do this does not appear; in this respect the statute seems to have been supplemented ex gratia; and whether future Boards would be so kind is not certain. As expressed in Stuart v. … In our own jurisdiction it is not an open question: Lexington v. Lopp, 210 N.C. 196, 197 , 185 S.E. 766 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N.C. 499, 514 , 115 S.E. 336 ; Lumber Co. v. Smith, 146 N.C. 199 , 59 S.E. 653 ; R. R. v.

Seawell v. . Hall

185 N.C. 80 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1923

C., 33 ; Rowland v. Rowland, 93 N. C., 214 ; Triplett v. Williams, 149 N. C., 394 ; Beacom v. Amos, 161 N. C., 365 ; Brown v. Brown, 168 N. C., 4 ; Gold Mining Co. v. Lumber Co., 170 N. C., 273 ; Williams v. … Jones v. Casualty Co., 140 N. C., 262 ; Midgett v. Meekins, 160 N. C., 42 .

State v. . Newcomb

107 N.C. 900 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

, and filed with the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, the *902 same shall be utterly void,” &c. … Muller v. Commissioners, 89 N. C., 171 ; State v. Brittain, id, 576. The statute {The Code, §3701) has not been repealed or modified.

Asheville v. . Trust Co.

143 N.C. 360 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1906

In Baumann v. … In Baumann v.

Beasley v. Food Fair of N. C., Inc.

282 N.C. 530 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 1973

The Board’s General Counsel denied plaintiffs’ appeal for the same reason. Thereafter the plaintiffs instituted this action. In Willard v. … Electrical Workers Local 761 v. Labor Board, 366 U.S. 667, 672 .

Johnson v. Eversole Lumber Co.

144 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1907

Justice Brown in McAden v. Palmer, supra, that it is sufficient to refer to the opinion in that case without repeating what is there so well said. … Blue v. Gilchrist, 84 N. C., 239 . It is true.that this claim, having accrued 27 June, 1856, was governed by the ten years’ statute of presumptions (R. C., ch. 65, sec. 19; Campbell v. Brown, 86 N.

Messer v. . Smathers

213 N.C. 183 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1938

Moore v. Board of Education , 212 N.C. 499 ; Crabtree v. Board of Education , 199 N.C. 645 , 155 S.E. 550 ; Clark v. McQueen , 195 N.C. 714 , 143 S.E. 528 ; Board of Education v. … Forrest , 190 N.C. 753 , 130 S.E. 621 ; McInnish v. Board of Education , 187 N.C. 494 , 122 S.E. 182 ; School Com. v. Board of Education , 186 N.C. 643 , 120 S.E. 202 ; Davenport v.

Person v. . Twitty

28 N.C. 115 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1845

Cowper v. Scott, 1 Pr. Wms. 119. Edwards v. Freeman, 2 Pr. Wms. 440. … Walton v. Walton, 14 Ves. 318. Brown v. Brown, 2 Ired. Eq. 309.

Matter of Golia-Paladin

327 N.C. 132 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 26, 1990

The Board denied applicant’s request to withdraw his application, and the superior court held that the Board did not abuse its discretion in so doing. We affirm the superior court. … Having concluded that the applicant failed to satisfy the Board of his compliance with this requirement, the Board had a duty to deny the application. Baker v. Varser, 240 N.C. 260 , 82 S.E.2d 90 (1954).

State v. . Peacock

220 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1941

S. v. Levy, 187 N. C., 581 , 122 S. E., 386 . . Does this single departure invalidate the statute? The pertinent authorities suggest a negative answer. S. v. Mallard, 184 N. C., 667 , 114 S. E., 17 ; S. v. Wood, 175 N. … E., 1050 ; S. v. Brittain, 143 N. C., 668 , 57 S. E., 352 ; S. v. Lewis, 142 N. C., 626 , 55 S. E., 600 ; S. v. Barker, 107 N. C., 913 , 12 S. E., 115 .

State Ex Rel. Pate v. Oliver

104 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

Manly, J., in Nelson v. Hall, 5 Jones Eq., 32 . They-are “answerable only for that crassa negligentia or gross negligence which evidences mala fides.” Nash, J., in Deberry v. Ivey, 2 Jones Eq., 370 ; Patterson v. … Brown and King’s devisees sold the land to Paul and executed their deeds for the same on 24th March, 1874.

Denny v. . Mecklenburg County

211 N.C. 558 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937

The cases cited by the defendants, Adams v. Miles , 300 S.W. (Tex.Civ.App.), 211, and Young v. Linwood , 97 S.W.2d (Ark.), 627, are neither controlling nor directly in point. … Nor can the defendants derive any comfort from anything that was said in Taylor v. Board of Education , 206 N.C. 263 , 173 S.E. 608 , or Frazier v. Comrs. , 194 N.C. 49 , 138 S.E. 433 .

Donlop v. Snyder

234 N.C. 627 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1951

Bradford v. Cook, supra ( 232 N.C. 699, p. 701 ). See also Maddox v. Brown, 233 N.C. 519 , 64 S.E. 2d 864 , and cases cited. … Fowler v. Atlantic Co., Inc., supra (ante, 542); Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 244, p. 249 , 59 S.E. 2d 791 ; Gladden v. Setzer, 230 N.C. 269 , 52 S.E. 2d 804 ; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122, 52 S.E. 2d 377 ; Bundy v.

Bell v. . Thurston

214 N.C. 231 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1938

J., in Richardson v. Cheek, 212 N. C., 510 , 193 S. E., 705 ; Herring v. Williams, 153 N. C., 231, 69 S. E., 140 ; Goode v. Hearne, 180 N. C., 475 , 105 S. E., 5 ; Reid v. Neal, 182 N. C., 192 , 108 S. … Brown v. Brown, 27 N. C., 136 . Tbe judgment below is Affirmed. EaeNHIll, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.