Case law

Southern Assembly v. . Palmer

166 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

School Comrs. v. Board of Aldermen, 158 N. C., pp.. 191-198, citing 1 Lewis Sutherland (2 Ed.), sec. 268; Dodgers v. U. S., 185 U. S., 83 , and other authorities.” … . *82 In Comrs. v. Webb, supra; Corporation Commission v. Construction Co., 160 N. C., 582 ; United Brethren v. Comrs., 115 N. C., 489 ; Loan Assn. v. Comrs., 115 N.

State v. Chekanow

370 N.C. 488 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 2018

One of the shovels was covered in dirt that was similar to the dirt at the base of the marijuana plants, whereas the dirt in the garden was brown. … State v. Thorpe, 326 N.C. 451, 454-55, 390 S.E.2d 311, 313 (1990) (emphases added) (citing State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1, 187 S.E.2d 706 (1972), and State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984)).

Higdon v. Davis

315 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1985

Brown and husband, C. S. Brown, Jr. and Margaret C. Wall and husband, John 0. Wall, plaintiffs’ predecessors in title to the servient tract, conveyed to R. D. … Brown and husband, C. S. Brown, Jr., and Margaret C. Wall and husband, John 0.

Moore v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

163 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1913

Brown v. Electric Co., 138 N. C., 345. The city cannot transfer to any individual or to a gwasi-public corporation for its convenience and profit this superior right, which it can exercise only for the public benefit. … The subject has been so fully discussed and elucidated in Brown v. Electric Co., 138 N. C., 533 , that we need not do more than refer to the reasoning and the conclusions reached in that case.

Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. BUZZ OFF INSECT SHIELD, LLC

364 N.C. 248 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2010

698 S.E.2d 397 (2010) HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. … Brown, Greensboro, Grant S. Palmer, Philadelphia, PA, for Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co. Robert J. King, III, Greensboro, Cecilia O. Miller, San Diego, CA, J. Scott Ballenger, Washington, DC, for International Garment Tech.

State v. Allen

332 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1992

In Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 45 L. Ed. 2d 416 (1975), the Court held that the giving of a Miranda warning was not sufficient to remove the taint of a confession following an illegal arrest. … In Brown and in Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 73 L.

Hicks v. . Greene County

200 N.C. 73 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1930

Under the authority of Burton v. Realty Co., 188 N. C., 473 , 125 S. E., 3 , this proceeding must be dismissed. C. … Farthing v. Carrington, 116 N. C., 315 , 22 S. E., 9 ; McKethan v. Ray, 71 N. C., 165 .

Patterson v. McCormick

177 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1919

C., 69 , opinion by Gaston, J.; Brown v. Brown, 25 N. C., 134 , opinion by Ruffin, C. J.; Gibson v. Gibson, 49 N. C., 425 , opinion by Battle, J. This last case was decided in 1857. … Rice v. Satterwhite, 21 N. C., 69 , and note; Clapp v. Fogleman, 21 N. C., 467 ; Tillman v. Sinclair, 23 N. C., 183 ; Moore v. Barrow, 24 N. C., 436 ; Brown v. Brown, 25 N. C., 134 ; Garland v. Watt, 26 N.

Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. Guilford County

225 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1945

, or in pursuance of a resolution adopted by the board. … See London v. Comrs., supra. Whether the present board of commissioners for Guilford County may now supply the deficiency nunc pro lunc and proceed to act in the premises is not now before us.

High Point Surplus Co. v. Pleasants

263 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1965

Moore v. W. O. O. W., Inc., 253 N.C. 1 , 116 S.E. 2d 186 ; Lamm v. Crumpler, 240 N.C. 35 , 81 S.E. 2d 138 ; Foust v. Durham, 239 N.C. 306 , 79 S.E. 2d 519 ; Towery v. Dairy, 237 N.C. 544 , 75 S.E. 2d 534 ; McDowell v. … In S. v.

Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority

288 N.C. 98 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1975

The statement in Candler v. … In Morgan v.

Browning v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

263 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

Browning at the time she executed such right of way agreement. The purchase of an easement from one co-tenant does not carry with it an easement in the interest of the other co-tenant. Hill v. … In the case of Penn v.

Dewey v. . R. R.

142 N.C. 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1906

Old Ladies' Home v. Hoffman , 117 Iowa 716 ; Wichita v. Burleigh , 36 Kansas, 34. … Cited: White v. Kincaid , 149 N.C. 420 ; Barger v. Barringer , 151 N.C. 446 ; Butler v. Tobacco Co. , 152 N.C. 419 ; Commrs. v. Bonner , 153 N.C. 70 ; S. v. R. R., Ib. , 561, 562; R. R. v.

New Hanover Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Stein

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2020

V. STEIN Opinion of the Court of the amicus curiae brief submitted by the School Boards Association. … The Board of Education argues that it “provided many -19-  NEW HANOVER CTY. BD. OF EDUC. V.

State Ex Rel. Elliott v. Perkins

32 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1849

Every objection to the plaintiff’s recovery, raised in this case, is answered by the Court in the State v. McAlpin, 4 Ire. 148. … One of the duties of his office or as a member of the Board, is to receive the money belonging to the Board, and to disburse it according to law.

Hodges v. . Smith

158 N.C. 256 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1912

I had to hire a man to work at 50 cents per day and board at 25 cents per day. The horse I traded to Smith was worth $50. I lost him and *Page 217 lost my crop that year. My time was worth $1 per day. … Cited: S.C. , 159 N.C. 526 ; Fields v. Brown , 160 N.C. 299 ; Winn v. Finch , 171 N.C. 275 . (264)

Johnson v. Gray

263 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1965

(later C.J.), writing in Coleman v. … [Citations], In Kirby v.

Smathers v. Commissioners of Madison County

125 N.C. 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1899

McCless v. Meekins , 117 N.C. 34 ; Tate v. Commissioners , 122 N.C. 812 . … Bank v. Comrs. , 119 N.C. 214 ; Comrs. v. Snuggs , 121 N.C. 394 ; Comrs. v. Call , 123 N.C. 308 ; City of Charlotte v. Shepard , 122 N.C. 602 . In Comrs. v.

State v. Eubanks

283 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1973

First, that such analysis shall be performed according to methods approved by the State Board of Health, and second, that such analysis be made by a person possessing a valid permit issued by the State Board of Health for … Officer Pegram had a valid permit issued by the Board to conduct such analysis and testified that he made the analysis in this case according to methods approved by that Board.

Holmes v. . Bullock

178 N.C. 376 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1919

It acquired only the jurisdiction of the board of supervisors to determine whether a cartway should be established. McLaurin v. McIntyre , 167 N.C. 350 ; Boyett v. Vaughan , 85 N.C. 365 ; Ijames v. … McClamrock , 92 N.C. 365 ; Robeson v. Hodges , 105 N.C. 49 ; S. v. Wiseman , 131 N.C. 797 . The supervisors had no jurisdiction of proceedings for the laying out of a public road.