Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.56s
134 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1904
The cases of Cohen v. Comrs., 77 N. C., 2; Wardens v. Washington, 109 N. C., 21 ; Scott v. Smith, 121 N. C., 94 , were cited in the argument of the defendant’s counsel here in support of the contention. … In Bailey v. Raleigh, 130 N. C., 209 , 58 L. R.
Cited 22 timesPublishedSUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. v. State
366 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 2012
726 S.E.2d 850 (2012) SUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., et al v. STATE of NC, et al. No. 347P11-1. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 13, 2012. Jason B. Kay, for Sugar Creek Charter School, Inc., et al. Robert F. … King, III, Greensboro, for Cleveland County Board of Education, et al. Julia C. Ambrose, Greensboro, for Cleveland County Board of Education, et al. George W. Dennis, III, Raleigh, for County of Edgecombe, et al.
Cited 1 timesPublished259 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963
Creditors’ Service Corp. v. Cummings, 57 R.I. 291 , 190 A. 2 ; Haigh v. State Board of Hairdressing, 74 R.I. 106 , 58 A. 2d 925 . … See United States v. Petrillo, 332 U.S. 1 , 91 L. Ed. 1877 . In Simmons v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedBrock v. North Carolina Property Tax Commission
290 N.C. 755 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1976
BROCK et al., Petitioners, v. NORTH CAROLINA PROPERTY TAX COMMISSION sitting as the State Board of Equalization and Review et al., Respondents. No. 38. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … See In re Valuation, 282 N.C. 71 , 191 S.E.2d 692 (1972); In re King, 281 N.C. 533 , 189 S.E.2d 158 (1972); King v. Baldwin, 276 N.C. 316 , 172 S.E.2d 12 (1970).
Cited 2 timesPublishedFidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Fleming
132 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1903
''fore the board of commissioners for the release of Burton are without authority and void, and do not release the defendant Burton from liability on the bond.” Clark v. Am. Surety Co., 171 Ill., 235 ; Wood v. … In Rudolph v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Rhodes v. Hampton
101 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888
of any county has abolished the office of County Treasurer, the said board shall have like power to re-establish the same, if, in the judgment of the board, the public interests so require.” … As. then, the office of Treasurer was, by the vote of the -Justices, restored, and without an incumbent a vacancy existed —Cloud v. Wilson, 72 N.
Cited 7 timesPublishedReed v. Howerton Engineering Co.
188 N.C. 39 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 21, 1924
Brown, J., in Lutterloh v. Fayetteville, 149 N. … Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 598 ; Mills v. Comrs., 175 N. C., 215 ; Comrs. v. Pruden, 178 N. C., 394 ; Comrs. v. Bank, 181 N. C., 347 ; In re Harris, 183 N. C., 633 ; Kornegay v. Goldsboro, 180 N. C., 446 ; S. v.
Cited 15 timesPublished191 N.C. 542 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1926
Hall v. Tillman, 110 N. C., 220 . Tbe judgment, therefore, should have followed tbe statute and the terms of tbe bond. Council v. Averett, 90 N. C., 168 . … Motor Co. v. Sands, 186 N. C., 732 ; Randolph v. McGowans, 174 N. C., 203 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedEmpire Power Co. v. N. C. Department of Environment
337 N.C. 569 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 9, 1994
See Lemons v. … See State v.
Cited 58 timesPublishedOrinoco Supply Co. v. Masonic & Eastern Star Home
163 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1913
Brown, J. Tbis is an action brought by tbe plaintiffs to subject tbe property of tbe defendant to a lien for material fur *515 nished to tbe Auge Construction. … See, also, Rex v. Justices of Middlesex, 2 B. and A., 818; Townsend v. Brown, 24 N. J., 86. In Farmers Bank v. Hail, 59 N.
Cited 13 timesPublished316 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1986
344 S.E.2d 18 (1986) 316 N.C. 557 Betty TROUGHT v. Jack RICHARDSON, Fred Brown, and Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc. No. 116P86. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 6, 1986.
Cited 23 timesPublished339 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 30, 1994
Brown were made for the purpose of preparing and presenting a defense to the crimes for which he stood accused. Cf. State v. … State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56 , 388 S.E.2d 84 ; State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179 , 358 S.E.2d 1 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987).
Cited 99 timesPublishedAmerican Motors Sales Corp. v. Peters
311 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1984
Brown, Franchising: Realities and Remedies 2 (2nd ed. 1978). … Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977). There was ample evidence presented at the hearing to support the Commissioner’s determination.
Cited 8 timesPublished169 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1915
BROWN, J. … S. v. Bailey, 162 N. C., 583 ; S. v. Register, 133 N. C., 747 ; S. v. Wilcox, 132 N. C., 11 ; S. v. Kinsauls, 126 N. C., 1092; S. v. Carter, 126 N. C., 1011 . Affirmed.
Cited 11 timesPublished255 N.C. 619 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1961
People v. Omen, 124 N.E. 860, 863 . … Styers v. Gastonia, 252 N.C. 572 , 114 S.E. 2d 348 ; Honey Properties, Inc. v. Gastonia, 252 N.C. 567 , 114 S.E. 2d 344 .
Cited 51 timesPublished229 N.C. 128 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1948
Brown v. Hecht Co., 137 F. (2d), 689. … Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 196 S. E., 333 ; Wheeler v. Bank. 209 N. C., 258 , 183 S. E., 269 ; Bean v. Detective Co., 206 N. C., 125 , 173 S. E., 5 ; Strider v. Lewey, 176 N. C., 448 , 97 S. E., 398 ; Lloyd v. R.
Cited 2 timesPublished350 N.C. 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1999
State v. Wilson, 322 *289 N.C. 117, 367 S.E.2d 589 (1988). … State v. Robinson, 346 N.C. 586 , 488 S.E.2d 174 (1997).
Cited 9 timesPublished60 N.C. 259 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1864
That such evidence is admissible for such purposes was directly decided by this Court in the case of Brown vs. Brown, 4 Jones, Rep. 123. … <• v-ovo awarded.
Cited 0 timesPublished126 N.C. 356 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1900
Kerner v. Cottage Co., 123 N. C., 294 . … That was an erroneous answer to the 7th issue, for in Wilcox v. Leach, 123 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished230 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1949
Salmon v. Pearce, 223 N.C. 587 , 27 S.E. 2d 647 ; Bailey v. R. R., 223 N.C. 244 , 25 S.E. 2d 833 ; Bunting v. Salsbury, 221 N.C. 34 , 18 S.E. 2d 697 ; Jackson v. Parks, 220 N.C. 680 , 18 S.E. 2d 138 ; Brown v. … Brown v. Jerrild, 29 Ariz. 121 , 239 P. 795 ; 23 C.J.S., Criminal Law, section 1257.
Cited 19 timesPublished
Ask Donna