Case law

Noland Co. v. Hester

190 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1925

In Hutchinson v. Comrs., 172 N. C., 844 , the Board of Commissioners of Iredell County, upon notice duly received, paid to a subcontractor (Lon Gr. … S., 2445, render the defendant, board of trustees, in its official capacity, civilly liable for any part of plaintiff’s uncollected claim? This precise question was before the Court in Warner v. Halyburton, 187 N.

Holland v. . Hartley

171 N.C. 376 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1916

Daniel v. R. R., ante, 23; 29 Cyc., 1626; Lowrie v. Oxendine, 153 N. C., 268 . … Peele v. Powell, 156 N. C., 557 ; Dale v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 653 . It would, however, have'been error had the judge stopped with that instruction and said nothing more.

Crocker v. Moore.

140 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1906

Board of Education v. Commissioners, 137 N. C., 310 . 4. … Tate v. Commisioners, 122 N. C., 812 ; Herring v. Dixon, ibid., 420; Satterthwaite v. Commissioners, 76 N. C., 153 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 249 . 5.

Bowser v. Wescott

145 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1907

I am unable to see any practical difference between this case and McCormick v. Monroe, 46 N. C., 13 , and Board of Education v. Makeley, 139 N. C., 31 . … It is for this reason, *67 among others, that we unanimously decided, in Board of Education v. Makeley, 139 N.

Harper v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

161 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1913

*452 BROWN, J. … Rippey v. Miller, 46 N. C., 480 ; Guano Co. v. Magee, 86 N. C., 351 ; Williams v. Lumber Co., 118 N. C., 928 ; Lane v. Butler, 135 N. C., 419 ; Stephenson v. Koonce, 103 N. C., 266 ; Wilson v. Troy, 18 L. R.

Brinkley v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

271 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 1967

Campbell v. Trust Co., 214 N.C. 680 , 200 S.E. 392 ; Bank v. Stone, 213 N.C. 598 , 197 S.E. 132 . In weighing the credibility of the testimony, the jury has the right to believe any part or none of it. Brown v. … In Keith v.

State v. . Smith

221 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1942

Ayers said to Brown, "Let's go, two of them are Harris drivers and they might call Charlotte and we might have trouble." On leaving Mack's Place, Ayers got in the sleeper and Brown was driving. … Howard Brown testified: "One car pulled up to the side of the trailer and shot down my left rear tractor outside tire. I stopped on the shoulder of the road. . . .

Orinoco Supply Co. v. Masonic & Eastern Star Home

163 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1913

Brown, J. Tbis is an action brought by tbe plaintiffs to subject tbe property of tbe defendant to a lien for material fur *515 nished to tbe Auge Construction. … See, also, Rex v. Justices of Middlesex, 2 B. and A., 818; Townsend v. Brown, 24 N. J., 86. In Farmers Bank v. Hail, 59 N.

State v. Kinston Charter Acad.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2021

STATE V. … McDonald- Hall, both individually and as the Chair of the Academy’s Board. In its complaint,  STATE V.

Trought v. Richardson

316 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1986

344 S.E.2d 18 (1986) 316 N.C. 557 Betty TROUGHT v. Jack RICHARDSON, Fred Brown, and Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc. No. 116P86. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 6, 1986.

Dull v. Dull

232 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1950

Ellis v. Barnes, 231 N.C. 543 , 57 S.E. 2d 772 ; Edgerton v. Harrison, 230 N.C. 158 , 52 S.E. 2d 357 ; Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N.C. 398 , 135 S.E. 121 ; Willis v. Trust Co., 183 N.C. 267 , 111 S.E. 163 ; Springs v. … This view is supported by the decisions in Turner v. Turner, supra, and Williams v. Williams, supra. And, as stated in the Turner case, the principles announced in Roberson v.

Middlesex Construction Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Art Museum Building Commission

307 N.C. 569 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1983

. § 143-135.3, and the judicial prescript enunciated in Smith v. … See Stahl-Rider v. State, 48 N.C. App. 380 , 269 S.E. 2d 217 (1980).

In Re Stevenson

237 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1953

See Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. The Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, et al. (1947) (Ind.), 72 N.E. 2d 662 ; Blakely v. … Maryland Unemployment Compensation Board (1947), 53 A. 2d 579 ; Bako, et al., v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Pa.), 171 Pa. Super. 222 , 90 A. 2d 309 ; M. A. Ferst Limited v.

Berry v. . Berry

215 N.C. 339 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1939

S., 978; West v. West, 199 N. C., 12 , 153 S. E., 600 ; S. v. Clark, 207 N. C., 657 , 178 S. E., 119 . The case is unlike Dyer v. Dyer, 213 N. C., 634 , 197 S. E., 157 , or Pain v. Pain, 80 N. C., 322 . … S., 986; In re Brown, 168 N. C., 417 , 84 S. E., 690 ; May v. Ins. Co., 172 N. C., 795 , 90 S. E., 890 . Error and remanded.

Mussallam v. Mussallam

321 N.C. 504 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988

The wife cites Katzenstein v. R.R. … See also Cole v. Laws, 104 N.C. 651 , 10 S.E. 172 (1889).

Hamilton v. . Icard

114 N.C. 532 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

v. … The opinion in Brown v. .Potter, therefore, is not susceptible of the interpretation that the possession of an occupant claiming under colorable title by virtue of possession for twenty-one years is necessarily interrupted

State v. Railroad

141 N.C. 846 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1906

Railway v. Smith, 20 Tex. App., 451; Reid v. People, 29 Colo., 333 ; State v. Ramussen, 7 Idaho, 1 ; Kimmish v. Ball, 129 U. S., 217 . … Co. v. U. S., 127 U. S., 466 ; State v. Stoll, 17 Wall., 425 ; Longlois v. Longlois, 48 Ind., 60 ; Casey v. Harned, 5 Clarke (Iowa), 1; State v. Custer, 65 N. C., 339 ; Code, see. 3766; Breitung v.

Mitchell v. Mitchell

270 N.C. 253 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1967

Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1 , 95 S.E. 2d 118 ; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129 , 37 S.E. 2d 118 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 . … Bunn v. Bunn, 262 N.C. 67 , 136 S.E. 2d 240 ; Stancil v. Stancil, 255 N.C. 507 , 121 S.E. 2d 882 ; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N.C. 181 , 22 S.E. 2d 576 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 . See Smith v.

State v. Davis

325 N.C. 607 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1989

N.C.G.S. § 15A-1212(8) (1988); State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 189-90 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 10 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987). This assignment of error is overruled. … Defendant recognizes that this issue has been decided adversely to his position, State v. Allen, 323 N.C. 208 , 372 S.E.2d 855 (1988), but asks this Court to reconsider its position in light of Brown v. Rice, 693 F.

State v. . Lemons

182 N.C. 828 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1921

In S. v. Mitchell, 156 N. … This section was sustained in S. v. Brown, 170 N. C., 714 . 2.