Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

0.27s

  • Southern Audit Co. v. McKensie

    147 N.C. 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 22, 1908

    In Martin v. Clark, 135 N. … Martin v. Clark, 135 N. C., 180 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

    364 N.C. 128 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 2010

    695 S.E.2d 759 (2010) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 14, 2010. David L. Brown, Greensboro, Grant S. Palmer, Philadelphia, PA, for Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wilmington v. Bryan

    141 N.C. 666 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1906

    It appeared from the report that the defendant was by agreement associated with the city attorney in the collection of back taxes, and that the latter by resolution of the board of aldermen, concurred in by the board of audit … Booth v. Ratcliffe, 107 N. C., 6 ; Roberts v. Woodworking Co., supra; Curtis v. Piedmont Co., supra; Smith v. Stewart, 83 N. C., 408 ; King v. Brown, 2 Hill (N. Y.), 485; Barr v. Van Duyn, 45 Iowa, 228 ; Cox v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Casey v. . Dare County

    168 N.C. 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1915

    Norfleet v. Staton, 73 N. C., 546 ; Van Amringe v. Taylor, 108 N. C., 196 . … DeBerry v. Nicholson, 102 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.

    312 N.C. 224 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

    Stanley Brown entered an order staying litigation between LaFave Company and the Fryes while they arbitrated their differences in accordance with the terms of the contract. … There plaintiff sued for divorce from bed and board, alimony pendente lite, permanent alimony, custody of the three children, and child support.

    Cited 90 timesPublished
  • Laughinghouse v. City of New Bern

    232 N.C. 596 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1950

    Person v. Doughton, 186 N.C. 723, 120 S.E. 481 ; White v. Commrs. of Johnston, 217 N.C. 329 , 7 S.E. 2d 702 ; Steele v. Cotton Mills, 231 N.C. 636 , 58 S.E. 2d 620 ; Hancock v. Bulla, post, 620. … See Riddle v. Ledbetter, 216 N.C. 491 , 5 S.E. 2d 542 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Eubanks

    283 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1973

    First, that such analysis shall be performed according to methods approved by the State Board of Health, and second, that such analysis be made by a person possessing a valid permit issued by the State Board of Health for … Officer Pegram had a valid permit issued by the Board to conduct such analysis and testified that he made the analysis in this case according to methods approved by that Board.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Brinkley v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

    271 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 1967

    Campbell v. Trust Co., 214 N.C. 680 , 200 S.E. 392 ; Bank v. Stone, 213 N.C. 598 , 197 S.E. 132 . In weighing the credibility of the testimony, the jury has the right to believe any part or none of it. Brown v. … In Keith v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kiff v. . Weaver

    94 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1886

    Jackson v. Love, supra, and Pate v. Brown, 85 N. C., 166 . … Redfield on Wills, Part II, 312, 313, and to same effect Brown v. Brown, 18 Conn., 410 ; Williams on Executors, 692; Iredell on Executors, 52.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. . Hodges

    180 N.C. 751 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 24, 1920

    The validity of such statute conferring power on the Board of Agriculture to make regulations within the purview of this section was upheld in S. v. R. R., 141 N. C., 846 , and S. v. Garner, 158 N. … S. v. Hay, 126 N. C., 999 ; Morgan v. Stewart, 144 N. C., 424 , and in other matters, S. v. Beacham, 125 N. C., 652 ; and in many other instances. Shelby v. Power Co., 155 N. C., 196 ; Durham v. Cotton Mills, 141 N.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. . Sawyer

    224 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1944

    S. v. Burke, 73 N. C., 83 ; S. v. Brown, 113 N. C., 645 , 18 S. E., 51 ; S. v. Holt, 192 N. C., 490 , 135 S. E., 324 . Generally the element of force in the offense of robbery may be actual or constructive. … S. v. Burke, supra, S. v. Brown, supra. Moreover, in an indictment for *66 robbery the allegation of ownership of the property taken is sufficient when it negatives the idea that the accused was taking his own property.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Dunn v. City of Charlotte

    284 N.C. 542 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1974

    “In reviewing the procedure followed by a municipal governing board in an annexation proceeding the question whether the municipality is then providing services pursuant to the plan of annexation is not before the court. … See State v. Kirby, 276 N.C. 123 , 171 S.E. 2d 416 (1970), and cases cited; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577, 579 , 58 S.E. 2d 351, 353 (1950), and cases there cited; Putnam v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Satterfield v. . Kindley

    144 N.C. 455 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1907

    Browne on Stat. Frauds, sec. 117. … Browne, supra, where the authorities are collected. A court of equity will not allow the vendee to hold the-land and at the same time refuse to pay for it. Champion v. Mooday, 85 Ky., 31 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Howell v. . Howell

    151 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909

    Wilson v. Charlotte , 74 N.C. 759 ; London v. Wilmington , 78 N.C. 111 ; Ashcraft v. Lee , 79 N.C. 35 ; Evans v. Comrs. , 89 N.C. 158 ; Vaughan v. Comrs. , 117 N.C. 434 ; Herring v. Dixon , 122 N.C. 422 ; Stratford v. … Goldsboro , 149 N.C. 134 ; Board of Education v. Comrs. , 150 N.C. 124 . In Board of Education v. Comrs. , 150 N.C. 121 , Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton Mills

    177 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1919

    Anderson v. Anderson, 42 Vt., 352 ; Gardner v. Board of Education, 5 Dakota, 259 . It is settled by many well-adjudged cases, especially by the case of Cross v. … Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 ; Rackley v. Roberts, 147 N. C., 201 ; McDonald v. Hoffman, 153 N. C., 254 . Jurisdiction is presumed where the contrary does not appear on the record. Bernard v. Brown, 118 N.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Comrs. of Brunswick v. . Walker

    203 N.C. 505 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1932

    The board of county commissioners of Brunswick County allowed the defendant, W. H. … S. v. Young , 106 N.C. 567 , 10 S.E. 1019 . There is no error in the judgment. It is Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Jones v. Jones

    80 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

    Norfleet v. Staton, 73 N. C., 546 . Under an act of the general assembly (afterwards declared unconstitutional in Cloud v. Wilson, 72 N. … We have decided at the present term, in Buckman v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Rollins

    363 N.C. 232 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 2009

    Agent Brown interviewed Mrs. Rollins. The details Mrs. Rollins provided concerning the murder were consistent with evidence found at the crime scene. Agent Brown asked Mrs. … State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Oliver v. . Oliver

    219 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1941

    See Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 193 S. … See Moore v. Moore, 130 N. C., 333 , 41 S.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Neal v. Nelson

    117 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1895

    In Brown v. Brown, Justice Natis delivering the opinion of the Court and referring to the authorities cited in Avent v. … Beard v. Ryan, 73 Ala., 37; Catlin v. Deller, 38 Conn., 26 ; Stowher v. Griffin, 20 Ga., 312 ; Paxson v. Bailey, 17 Ga., 600 ; Brown v. King, 5 Metcalf, 173.

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.