Case law

Johnson v. . Commissioners

192 N.C. 561 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1926

These bonds have been issued and sold by the board, and the proceeds loaned to the commission, pursuant to the agreement, which is valid, and authorized by statute. Young v. … Edwards v. Goldsboro , 141 N.C. 60 .

Witty v. . Barham

147 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 22, 1908

Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 . … This statute was held constitutional (Hall v. Walker, 118 N. C., 377 ) and has been cited as authority. Brown v. Brown, 121 N. C., 10; Finger v. Hunter, 130 N. C., 531; Smith v. Bruton, 137 N. C., 81.

Singletary v. Nixon

239 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1954

G.S. 20-141; Brown v. Bus Lines, 230 N.C. 493 , 53 S.E. 2d 539 ; Riggs v. Motor Lines, 233 N.C. 160 , 63 S.E. 2d 197 ; Williams v. Henderson, 230 N.C. 707 , 55 S.E. 2d 462 ; Matheny v. … Cox v. Lee, 230 N.C. 155 , 52 S.E. 2d 355 ; Brown v. Bus Lines, supra; Adcox v. Austin, 235 N.C. 591 , 70 S.E. 2d 837 ; Adams v. Service Co., 237 N.C. 136 , 74 S.E. 2d 332 .

State v. . Sheffield

183 N.C. 783 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1922

Sheriff Brown immediately carried him before a justice of tbe peace, and on tbe way defendant told him there was no use of having a trial, that be would just waive examination. … S. v. Burchfield, 149 N. C., 537 , which seems to answer fully all tbe contentions of tbe defendant in 'this respect.

Rowe v. Walker

340 N.C. 107 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1995

ROWE, Jr., and Donna Grant Rowe v. John Thomas WALKER, C. Norman Walker and Shirley Walker Kennedy. No. 181A94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 1995. Manning, Fulton & Skinner, P.A. by John I. … Brown & Bunch by Charles Gordon Brown and Scott D. Zimmerman, Chapel Hill, for defendants-appellants. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Walker v. . Walker

60 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

That such evidence is *Page 159 admissible for such purposes was directly decided by this Court, in Brown v. Brown , 49 N.C. 123 . … Calvert , 83 N.C. 371 ; Cheatham v. Rowland , 105 N.C. 222 ; Patton v. Garrett , 116 N.C. 858 ; Millinery Co. v. Ins. Co. , 160 N.C. 141 . *Page 160

State v. Campbell

359 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2005

Brown v. Texas. A court must consider “the totality of the circumstances — the whole picture” in determining whether a reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop exists. U.S. v. Cortez. … Adams, 347 N.C. 48, 77 , 490 S.E.2d 220, 236 (1997) (quoting State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 231 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 34 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L.

Holton v. . Mocksville

189 N.C. 144 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1925

Tarboro v. Forbes , 185 N.C. 59 . … Belo v. Comrs. , 76 N.C. 489 ; Wharton v. Greensboro , 149 N.C. 62 ; Anderson v. Wilkins , 142 N.C. 154 ; Edwards v. Comrs. , 183 N.C. 58 ; Board of Education v. Board of Comrs., ibid. , 300.

Glenn v. . Culbreth

197 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1929

Wikel v. Board of Commissioners, 120 N. C., 451 , 27 S. E., 117 ; Pickler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., 221 , 62 S. E., 902 ; Little v. Lenoir, 151 N. C., 415 , 66 S. E., 337 ; Wallace v. Wilkesboro, 151 N. … Ellison v. Raleigh, 89 N. C., 125 ; Markham v. Simpson, 175 N. C., 135 , 95 S. E., 106 ; Johnston v. Board of Elections, 172 N. C., 162 , 90 S. E., 143 .

In re J.U.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2023

(quoting State v. Brown, 332 N.C. 262, 267 (1992)).2 The Court of Appeals relied on State v. Raines, 72 N.C. … Brown, 332 N.C. at 267 (quoting State v. Etheridge, 319 N.C. 34, 45 (1987)).

Fortune v. . Hunt

149 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 1908

Baldwin v. Maultsby, supra; 2 Jones Law of Real Property, sec. 1312; 1 Devlin on Deeds, sec. 279 ; Brown v. Brown, 66 Me., 316; Shurtleff v. Francis, 118 Mass.; Jones v. Jones, 6 Conn., 111 ; Lang v. Smith, 37 W. … Meadows v. Cozart, 76 N. C., 450 ; Kendrick v. Dellinger, 117 N. C., 492 ; Lyerly v. Wheeler, 34 N. C., 291 .

Bissett v. . Bailey

176 N.C. 43 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1918

The case of Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , is not like this case, for there the attempt was to prove a conversation of the deceased for the purpose of fixing liability upon Mr. … Brown v. Adams related to the terms of a contract, and was not remotely connected with the state of Mr. Adams’s mind or his physical condition.

State v. Barnes

334 N.C. 67 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1993

This Court reviewed the law in State v. … State v. Stone, 323 N.C. at 451 , 373 S.E.2d at 433 .

State v. Casey

201 N.C. 185 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 27, 1931

S. v. Utley, supra; S. v. Blackwelder, 182 N. C., 899 .” … S. v. Green, 92 N. C., at p. 782; S. v. Stratford, 149 N. C., 483 ; S. v. Wilkins, 158 N. C., 603 ; S. v. Lawrence, 196 N. C., at p. 565.

State v. Bass

280 N.C. 435 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 9, 1972

On the second occasion, the State’s rebuttal witness Paulette Knox had testified that she was with Barrett’s girl friend Brenda Brown on Saturday night, 6 February 1971, during the hours when Brenda Brown and Barrett had … State v. Browning, 78 N.C. 555 (1877). Trial judges must be given sufficient discretion to meet the circumstances of each case. This assignment is overruled.

Clement v. Ireland.

138 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1905

Brown, J. This cause was before this court at August Term, 1901, and is reported in 129 N. C., at page 220. … See also Fertilizer Co. v. Grubbs, 114 N. C., 410; Edwards v .Morpin, 7 Mackey (D. C.) 39. In Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N.

Lucas v. . Belhaven

175 N.C. 124 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 20, 1918

It was a matter which rested in the discretion of the former board to pass such resolution, Broadnax v. … Cited: Board of Education v. Commissioners , 189 N.C. 652 .

Williams v. . Comrs.

182 N.C. 135 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1921

Laws 1921, ch. 38, sec. 28 (a), authorizes the board of county *Page 145 commissioners on Tuesday after the first Monday in April, 1921, acting as a board of review, to make a horizontal reduction throughout the county if … Cited: Spiers v. Davenport , 263 N.C. 59 . (140)

Plemmer v. Matthewson

281 N.C. 722 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 31, 1972

See also Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155, 162 , 166 S.E. 2d 78, 83 (1969). Plaintiffs’ second contention is, in effect, that Princeville could only annex the area in question by complying with N. C. Gen. … McIntyre v.

North Carolina Railroad v. Commissioners of Alamance

82 N.C. 259 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1880

R. v. Com’rs Brunswick, 72 N. C., 10 ; Bridge Co. v. Com’rs New Hanover, Ibid, 15. See also R. & D. R. R. Co. v. Brogden, 74 N. C., 707 to the same effect. In the R. & R. R. Co. v. Com’rs of Orange, 74 N. … Hinton v. Hinton, Phil., 410.