Case law

Gallimore v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

241 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 14, 1955

Abernathy v. R. R., supra. *355 Hence, evidence as to noise and smoke, etc., as in R. R. v. Armfield, 167 N.C. 464 , 83 S.E. 809 , injury to a spring, as in Brown v. … Brown v. Power Co., supra; Light Co. v. Moss, supra.

Glenn v. . Culbreth

197 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1929

Wikel v. Board of Commissioners, 120 N. C., 451 , 27 S. E., 117 ; Pickler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., 221 , 62 S. E., 902 ; Little v. Lenoir, 151 N. C., 415 , 66 S. E., 337 ; Wallace v. Wilkesboro, 151 N. … Ellison v. Raleigh, 89 N. C., 125 ; Markham v. Simpson, 175 N. C., 135 , 95 S. E., 106 ; Johnston v. Board of Elections, 172 N. C., 162 , 90 S. E., 143 .

State v. Carter

283 N.C. 107 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1973

194 S.E.2d 634 (1973) 283 N.C. 107 STATE of North Carolina v. Hazel CARTER and Robert Lee Hart. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 6, 1973. Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Walter E. … Brown & Brown, for defendant Hart. Petition for writ of certiorari by defendants to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 17 N.C.App. 234 , 193 S.E.2d 281 . Denied.

Home Real Estate Loan & Insurance v. Shaffner

214 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 22, 1938

United States v. The Montello, 11 Wall., 411 , 20 L. Ed., 191 ; Miller v. New York, 109 U. S., 385 , 27 L. Ed., 971 . In S. v. Glenn, 52 N. … Board of Education v. Lumber Co., 158 N. C., 314 , 73 S. E., 994 . The statute, C.

Winslow Bros. v. Staton

150 N.C. 264 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1909

Brown, J. The findings of fact and the evidence admitted on the trial establish, these facts: One J. L. … Langston, 110 Ga., 861 ; Tawnebaum v. Maisellus, 22 N. Y. Sup., 928; Trutt v. Brown (Ky.), 15 Am. Dec., 32 ; Morris v. Sellers, 46 Tex., 391 ; Marsh v. Irons, 3 Mo. App., 486 .

Sloan Financial Group, Inc. v. Beckett

358 N.C. 146 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2004

New Africa Investment Management, LLC and New Africa Advisers, Inc., Plaintiffs and Cross-Claim Defendants, New Africa Opportunity Fund, L.P., d/b/a ZM Africa Investment Fund, L.P., Plaintiff-Intervenor and Cross-Claimant v. … Thelen Reid & Priest, LLP, by Mark Fox Evens, pro hac vice, Washington, DC; and Brown & Bunch, PLLC, by LeAnn Nease Brown, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellees and defendant-appellee Maceo K. Sloan.

McCracken v. Greensboro, Northern & Atlantic Railway Co.

168 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1915

The County of Randolph v. … Sprunt v. May, 156 N. C., 388 ; Hutchins v. Bank, 128 N. C., 72 .

In Re the Will of Smith

249 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1959

Weir v. Humphries, 39 N.C. 264 ; Royster v. Royster, 61 N.C. 226 ; Houston v. Smith, 88 N.C. 312 ; Redding v. Vogt, 140 N.C. 562 , 53 S.E. 337 , 6 Ann. Cas. 312; Thomas v. Bunch, 158 N.C. 175 , 73 S.E. 899 ; 17A Am. … Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1 , 95 S.E. 2d 118 ; Luther v. Luther, 234 N.C. 429 , 67 S.E. 2d 345 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 .

Rowe v. Walker

340 N.C. 107 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1995

ROWE, Jr., and Donna Grant Rowe v. John Thomas WALKER, C. Norman Walker and Shirley Walker Kennedy. No. 181A94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 1995. Manning, Fulton & Skinner, P.A. by John I. … Brown & Bunch by Charles Gordon Brown and Scott D. Zimmerman, Chapel Hill, for defendants-appellants. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Bemont v. Isenhour

249 N.C. 106 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1958

Sledge v. Wagoner, 248 N.C. 631 ; Lee v. Green & Co., 236 N.C. 83 , 72 S.E. 2d 33 ; Hahn v. Perkins, 228 N.C. 727 , 46 S.E. 2d 854 ; Pafford v. Construction Co., 217 N.C. 730 , 9 S.E. 2d 408 ; Brigman v. … Harris v. Department Stores Co., 247 N.C. 195 ; Sledge v. *108 Wagoner, supra: Copeland v. Phthisic, 245 N.C. 580 , 96 S.E. 2d 697 ; Revis v. Orr, 234 N.C. 158 , 66 S.E. 2d 652 .

Blades v. Dewey.

136 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1904

The real point decided is that the language of the general statute will control the election by the board “for the ensuing year.” The case of Westervelt v. Mohsenstecher, 76 Fed. Rep., 118, 34 L. R. … Bank v. Odd Fellows, 48 Penn., 446; Thomas v. Summey, 46 N. C., 554: Welch v. Seymour, 28 Conn., 387 ; 5 Cyc., 773-4; Munford v. Rice, 6 Mun., 87. We do not think that the case of Bank v. Seidensticker, 92 N. W.

Moore v. Whitley

234 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1951

See Booker v. Highlands, 198 N.C. 282 , 151 S.E. 635 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 . See also Cherry v. Andrews, 229 N.C. 333 , 49 S.E. 2d 641 . … See Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537 , 61 S.E. 2d 603 .

State v. . Sheffield

183 N.C. 783 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1922

Sheriff Brown immediately carried him before a justice of tbe peace, and on tbe way defendant told him there was no use of having a trial, that be would just waive examination. … S. v. Burchfield, 149 N. C., 537 , which seems to answer fully all tbe contentions of tbe defendant in 'this respect.

Dearman v. Bruns

279 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1971

DEARMAN, Executor of the Estate of Richard Shaw Brown v. Lula Rumple BRUNS, Widow, Individually and as Executrix of Minnie Rumple Brown et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 6, 1971. William P.

Witty v. . Barham

147 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 22, 1908

Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 . … This statute was held constitutional (Hall v. Walker, 118 N. C., 377 ) and has been cited as authority. Brown v. Brown, 121 N. C., 10; Finger v. Hunter, 130 N. C., 531; Smith v. Bruton, 137 N. C., 81.

Singletary v. Nixon

239 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1954

G.S. 20-141; Brown v. Bus Lines, 230 N.C. 493 , 53 S.E. 2d 539 ; Riggs v. Motor Lines, 233 N.C. 160 , 63 S.E. 2d 197 ; Williams v. Henderson, 230 N.C. 707 , 55 S.E. 2d 462 ; Matheny v. … Cox v. Lee, 230 N.C. 155 , 52 S.E. 2d 355 ; Brown v. Bus Lines, supra; Adcox v. Austin, 235 N.C. 591 , 70 S.E. 2d 837 ; Adams v. Service Co., 237 N.C. 136 , 74 S.E. 2d 332 .

F. E. Lykes & Co. v. Grove

201 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1931

E., 736 , Brown, J., delivering the opinion of the Court, says: “Res *257 cission will bar an action for damages wben the only damage sustained is in not getting what was bargained for, and no special damages have been proven … Warren v. Susman, 168 N. C., 457 , 84 S. E., 760 ; Fields v. Brown, 160 N. C., 295 , 76 S. E., 8 ; Huggins v. Waters, 154 N. C., 443 , 70 S. E., 843 ; Dunlap v. Ingram, 57 N. C., 178 ; Pettijohn v. Williams, 55 N.

Walker v. . Walker

60 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

That such evidence is *Page 159 admissible for such purposes was directly decided by this Court, in Brown v. Brown , 49 N.C. 123 . … Calvert , 83 N.C. 371 ; Cheatham v. Rowland , 105 N.C. 222 ; Patton v. Garrett , 116 N.C. 858 ; Millinery Co. v. Ins. Co. , 160 N.C. 141 . *Page 160

Calkins Dredging Co. v. State

191 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1926

Nor can a commission or board, created by statute, as an agency of the State be sued. Carpenter v. R. R., 184 N. C., 400 . … Rosser v. Bynum, 168 N. C., 340 ; Supply Co. v. Watt, 181 N. C., 432 ; Blanchard v. Peanut Co., 182 N. C., 20 ; DeLoache v. DeLoache, 189 N. C., 394 .

Holton v. . Mocksville

189 N.C. 144 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1925

Tarboro v. Forbes , 185 N.C. 59 . … Belo v. Comrs. , 76 N.C. 489 ; Wharton v. Greensboro , 149 N.C. 62 ; Anderson v. Wilkins , 142 N.C. 154 ; Edwards v. Comrs. , 183 N.C. 58 ; Board of Education v. Board of Comrs., ibid. , 300.