Case law

Knight v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

168 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1915

McNeely v. Oil Co., 52 W. Va., 616 ; Fair v. Gurthwright, 5 Ga., 6 ; Elliott v. … There have heretofore been several cases in our own Court which have gone very far in approval of the principle (Burns v. Stewart, 162 N. C., 360 ; Greenleaf v. Bartlett, 146 N. C., 495 ; Brown v. Brown, 106 N.

Patillo v. . Lytle

158 N.C. 92 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1911

C., 482 ; Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 ; Mebane v. Mebane, 80 *97 N. C., 34; Latta v. Vickers, 82 N. C., 501 ; Foushee v. Durham, 84 N. C., 56 ; Miller v. Feezor, 82 N. C., 192 ; Attorney-General v. … Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 ; Sumner v. Sessoms, 94 N. C., 377 . It is suggested that this is a consent decree.

In Re Briggs

135 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1904

In Brown v. Walker , 161 U.S. 591 , Congress had, under the (123) intimation in Counselman v. … The same view is expressed in Brown v.

Ellis v. Trustees of the Graded School of Oxford

156 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1911

(Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. … Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N.

Finger v. Hunter.

130 N.C. 529 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1902

In Weir v. … Hall v. Walker , 118 N.C. 377 ; Brown v. Brown , 121 N.C. 8 , 38 L.R.A., 242 .

Castevens v. . Stanly County

209 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 74 ; Evans v. Mecklenburg Co., 205 N. C., 560 ; Hickory v. Catawba Co., 206 N. C., 165 ; Taylor v. Board of Education, 206 N. C., 263 ; Hemric v. Comrs. of Yadkin, 206 N. … Vaughn v. Comrs., 117 N. C., 429 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Haskett v. Tyrrell Co., 152 N. C., 714 .

Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem

302 N.C. 550 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1981

Campbell v. First Baptist Church, 298 N.C. 476 , 259 S.E. 2d 558 (1979); Matter of Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4, 296 N.C. 1 , 249 S.E. 2d 698 (1978); Koontz v. … Jolly v. Wright, 300 N.C. 83 , 265 S.E. 2d 135 (1980); Williams v. Williams, 299 N.C. 174 , 261 S.E. 2d 849 (1980); State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v.

State Ex Rel. County of Greene v. First National Bank of Snow Hill

194 N.C. 436 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1927

Brick Co. v. Gentry, 191 N. C., 636 ; Board of Health v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 250 ; Wood v. Kincaid, 144 N. C., 393 . … Board of Education v. Bateman, 102 N. C., 52 , 8 S. E., 882 . Tbe liability of tbe bondsman is tbe only question presented by tbe appeal.

Taylor v. Bowen

272 N.C. 726 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1968

Did the Community College Planning Board and the Cumberland County Board of Commissioners lose zoning jurisdiction and did the Citjr of Fayetteville acquire that jurisdiction when the area became a part of the city by annexation … (later C.J.) in Parsons v.

Spruill v. Town of Columbia

153 N.C. 46 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1910

If so, it is not reversible error, Collins v. Collins, 125 N. C., 98 . Tbe chief exception is to tbe refusal of tbe motion to nonsuit. … Jones v. Ins. Co., 151 N. C., 54 , and cases cited; Tuttle v. Tuttle, 146 N. C., 484 .

Pugh v. . Allen

179 N.C. 307 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 10, 1920

Brown v. Brown, 168 N. C., 4 ; Gilbert v. Shingle Co., 167 N. C., 286 ; Jones v. Whichard, 163 N. C., 241 ; Triplett v. Williams, 149 N. C., 394 . … Sain v. Baker, 128 N. C., 256 ; Francks v. Whitaker, 116 N. C., 518 ; Rollins v. Keel, 115 N. C., 68 . In Sain v.

Bratcher v. Winters

269 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1967

Buss v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128 , 59 S.E. 2d 589 (citing approximately 30 cases). … The Board conducted the hearing but failed to provide any record except the very sketchy notes of the Board’s Secretary.

Johnson v. Graye

251 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1959

Coleman v. Whisnant, 225 N.C. 494 , 35 S.E. 2d 647 . Also, see Bohannon v. … G.S. 1-128; Duke v. Campbell, 233 N.C. 262 , 63 S.E. 2d 555 , and oases cited. The substantial reasons underlying this statutory provision are stated in Love v. Commissioners, 64 N.C. 706 , and in Elam v.

Grady v. . Faison

224 N.C. 567 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1944

Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 , 145 S. E., 233 ; Lipe v. Trust Co., 206 N. C., 24 , 173 S. E., 316 ; Price v. Askins, 212 N. C., 583 , 194 S. E., 284 ; Daughtry v. Daughtry, 223 N. C., 528 . … Miller v. Lash, 85 N. C., 54 ; Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 , 145 S. E., 233 ; Lipe v. Trust Co., 207 N. C., 794 , 178 S. E., 665 . . The complaint was not demurrable. Grantham v. Grantham, 205 N. C., 363 , 171 S.

Colvin v. Tallassee Power Co.

199 N.C. 353 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1930

Draper v. Conner, 187 N. C., 18 , 121 S. E., 29 ; Durham v. Wright, 190 N. C., 568 , 130 S. E., 161 .” … In Grant v. Power Co., 196 N.

Insurance Co. v. . Guilford County

225 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1945

Also, Bryson v. Lucas , 84 N.C. 680 ; Hicks v. Kenan , 139 N.C. 337 , 51 S.E. 941 ; Basnight v. Jobbing Co. , 148 N.C. 350 , 62 S.E. 420 . … Among others, see the cases of Henderson v. Wilmington , 191 N.C. 269 , 132 S.E. 25 ; Palmer v. Haywood County , 212 N.C. 284 , 193 S.E. 668 ; Sing v. Charlotte , 213 N.C. 60 , 195 S.E. 271 ; Power Co. v.

Howard v. Boyce

254 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1961

Chavis v. Brown, 174 N.C. 122 , 93 S.E. 471 . … Chavis v. Brown, supra; Hatcher v. Faison, supra. A jury trial is not allowed as a matter of right, and a jury verdict would only be advisory in character. Chavis v. Brown, supra; Cleve v.

In Re Will of Yelverton

198 N.C. 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1930

Gattis v. Kilgo, 131 N. C., 199 , 42 S. E., 584 . “When we can see that the appellant has been really injured by such action, we will always order a new trial” —Brown, J., in Parrott v. R. R., supra. … In re Will of Brown, 194 N. C., 583 , 140 S. E., 192 , at page 597.

Duncan v. City of Charlotte

234 N.C. 86 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1951

Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Wilson v. Mooresville, 222 N.C. 283 , 22 S.E. 2d 907 ; Neely v. Statesville, 212 N.C. 365 , 193 S.E. 664 ; and Rewis v. Ins. … Ferguson, 202 N.C. 446 , 163 S.E. 688 ; Edgerton v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 205 N.C. 816 , 172 S.E. 481 ; S. v. Sasseen, 206 N.C. 644 , 175 S.E. 142 ; Brown v. Comrs. of Richmond County, 223 N.C. 744 , 28 S.E. 2d 104 .

Pocomoke Guano Co. v. City of New Bern

172 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1916

Wade v. Comrs., 74 N. C., 81 . … Pickens v. Comrs., 112 N. C., 699 . Lumber Co. v. Smith, 146 N. C., 199 , cited by plaintiff, has no relation to the question presented by this appeal.