Case law

Brewer Ex Rel. Oldham v. Valk

204 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1933

Lumber Co. v. Smith, 146 N. C., 199 ; Markham v. Carver, 188 N. C., 615 .” Hamilton v. Adams, 6 N. C., at p. 162; Gamble v. McCrady, 75 N. C., at p. 511; Yarborough v. Park Commission, 196 N. C., at p. 289. In Harden v. … Long v. Rockingham, 187 N. C., at p. 203; Reed v. Engineering Co., 188 N. C., at p. 42 ; Hinton v. State Treasurer, 193 N. C., at p. 499.

Snipes v. City of Winston

126 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1900

Tbe plaintiff was interested in obtaining the best possible contract from himself and his associates on the Board. … Smith v. Albany, 61 N. Y., 444 , is a case in point.

Blow v. . Harding

161 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1913

Brown, administrator of Short, obtained judgment against said L. J. Perkins, Spring Term, 1871, of Pitt. … Revisal, 574; Pipkin v. Adams, 114 N. C., 201 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 122 N. C., 594 ; Harrington v. Hatton, 130 N. C., 90 ; Wilson v. Lumber Co., 131 N. C., 167 .

Glisson v. . Hill

55 N.C. 256 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1855

Sowell v. Barrett, Busb. Eq. Rep. 50; Brown v. Carson, Ibid 272; Clement v. Clement, 1 Jones’ Eq. Rep. 184; Briggs v. Morris, Ibid 193; Lamb v. Pigford, Ibid 195; Taylor v. Taylor, Ibid 246. … The latter cannot of itself avail much, (see Brown v.

State v. Beal

311 N.C. 555 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 1984

Raines v. State, 294 Ala. 360 , 317 So. 2d 559 , reh’g denied, 294 Ala. 767 (1975); Thomas v. State, Ala. Crim. App., 445 So. 2d 992 (1984); Daniels v. State, Ala. Crim. App., 375 So. 2d 523 (1979). … See State v. Jackson, 309 N.C. 26 , 305 S.E. 2d 703 (1983).

Miller v. . London

60 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1864

See, among other cases, Lea v. Brown , 56 N.C. 141 . The residuary clause in favor of the testator's wife is shown, by the same case of Lea v. … Kirkpatrick v. Rogers , 42 N.C. 44 ; Swann v. Swann , 58 N.C. 299 .

Duncan v. City of Charlotte

234 N.C. 86 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1951

Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N.C. 766 , 32 S.E. 2d 320 ; Wilson v. Mooresville, 222 N.C. 283 , 22 S.E. 2d 907 ; Neely v. Statesville, 212 N.C. 365 , 193 S.E. 664 ; and Rewis v. Ins. … Ferguson, 202 N.C. 446 , 163 S.E. 688 ; Edgerton v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 205 N.C. 816 , 172 S.E. 481 ; S. v. Sasseen, 206 N.C. 644 , 175 S.E. 142 ; Brown v. Comrs. of Richmond County, 223 N.C. 744 , 28 S.E. 2d 104 .

State v. Loesch

237 N.C. 611 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1953

S. v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373 , 11 S.E. 2d 149 , 131 A.L.R. 143 ; S. v. Mooney, 173 N.C. 798 , 92 S.E. 610 ; S. v. Welch, 129 N.C. 579 , 40 S.E. 120 ; S. v. … G.S. 15-153; S. v. Ratliff, 170 N.C. 707 , 86 S.E. 997 ; S. v. Howley, 220 N.C. 113 , 16 S.E. 2d 705 ; S. v. Gregory, 223 N.C. 415 , 27 S.E. 2d 140 ; S. v. Davenport, supra; S. v.

State v. Kinston Charter Acad.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2021

STATE V. … McDonald- Hall, both individually and as the Chair of the Academy’s Board. In its complaint,  STATE V.

State v. Walker

662 S.E.2d 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

662 S.E.2d 392 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Christopher WALKER and Emit E. Browning, Jr. and Javier A. Hernandez, Jr. No. 16P05-3. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 10, 2008. Robert C. … Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Browning. Daniel L. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Walker. Geoffrey W. Hosford, Wilmington, for Hernandez. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 654 S.E.2d 722 .

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Mecklenburg County

181 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 18, 1921

Comrs. v. Boring, 175 N. C., 105 ; Lowery v. School Trustees, 140 N. C., 33 ; Cotton Mills v. Waxhaw, 130 N. C., 293 ; Berry v. Haines, 4 N. … S. v. Stokes, at present term, citing S. v. Burnett, 179 N. C., 735 ; Smith v. Wilkins, 164 N. C., 136 ; Efland v. R. R., 146 N. C., 135 ; Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S., 557 ; Tullis v. R. R., 175 U. S., 348 -353.

Kee v. . Dillingham

229 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1948

. *266 Fields v. Brown, 160 N. C., 295 , 76 S. E., 8 . The rule is well stated in 9 Am. … E. (2d), 484 ; Yarn Co. v. Mauney, 228 N. C., 99 , 44 S. E. (2d), 601 ; McNeill v. McNeill, 223 N. C., 178 (182), 25 S. E. (2d), 615 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N. C., 114 , 198 S.

Hall v. . Commissioners of Duplin

195 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1928

Thereafter, on 10 January, 1928, an affidavit was filed by the members of the board of education and the county superintendent to the effect that on 9 May, 1927, the board of education requested the board of commissioners … Lovelace v. Pratt, 187 N. C., 686 ; Frazier v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 49 ; Owens v. Wake County, ante, 132. The purpose for which the bonds are issued must be stated and set forth in the bond resolution itself.

Bratcher v. Winters

269 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1967

Buss v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128 , 59 S.E. 2d 589 (citing approximately 30 cases). … The Board conducted the hearing but failed to provide any record except the very sketchy notes of the Board’s Secretary.

Mangum v. Durham Loan & Trust Co.

195 N.C. 469 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1928

Patterson v. McCormick, 181 N. C., 311 ; Pilley v. Sullivan, 182 N. C., 493 ; Walker v. Trollinger, 192 N. C., 744 ; Williams v. Best, ante, 324; Brown v. Brown, ante, 315. … See Powell v. Wood, 149 N. C., p. 235; Austin v. Austin, 160 N. C., 367 ; Kidder v. Bailey, 187 N. C., 505 .

Clark v. . McQueen

195 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1928

The only question presented by this appeal is .whether the board of education of a county, in this State, has the power, in the exercise of its discretion, to discontinue a high school, theretofore established by said board … The principle stated and applied in deciding the question presented by the appeal in Newton v. School Committee, 158 N. C., 187 is well settled.

Rayfield v. Clark

283 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1973

Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153 , 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971). … Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485, 488 , 141 S.E. 2d 875, 877 (1965).

Nebel v. Nebel

223 N.C. 676 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1943

See also Moore v. Moore, 11 N. C., 358 , 15 Am. Dec., 523 ; Bunker v. Llewellyn, 221 N. C., 1 , 18 S. E. (2d), 717 . The principle here stated is differentiated from that applied in Godfrey v. … J., in Sugg v. Credit Corp., 196 N. C., 97 , 144 S. E., 554 .

Rogers v. . Clements

92 N.C. 81 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1885

This declaration was admitted to show non-payment by that obligor, it being necessary to prove non-payment by both in order to remove the presumption as to each under the ruling in Campbell v. Brown, 86 N. … The separate acknowledgment of one debtor *86 that he has not paid the debt is insufficient to charge him even, unless it is also shown that none of the others had made payment In Campbell v. Brown, 86 N.

Roberts v. . Saunders

192 N.C. 191 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1926

This idea is thus expressed by Justice Brown in Shuford v. Brady, 169 N. … Heath v. Cotton Mills, 115 N. C., 202 ; Strain v. Fitzgerald 130 N. C., 600 .