Case law

Hiatt v. . Ritter

223 N.C. 262 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1943

Martin v. Mfg. Co., 128 N. C., 264 , 38 S. E., 816 ; and in Osborne v. Coal Co., 207 N. C., 545 , 177 S. … Also in Brady v. B.B., 222 N. C., 367 , 23 S. E. (2d), 334 , this Court quoted with approval from Stone v. R. R., 171 Mass., 536 , 41 L. R.

Nance v. City of Winston-Salem

229 N.C. 732 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1949

The appeal is therefore dismissed on authority of Eller v. Wall, ante, p. 359, and Penland v. Gowan, ante, p. 449.

Townsend v. . Holderby

197 N.C. 550 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1929

Brown v. Brown, 121 N. C., 8 , 27 S. E., 998 . … Gross v. Gross, 70 W. Va., 317 , 73 S. E., 961 , 39 L. R. A. (N. S.), 261.

In Re Appeal of O'Neal

243 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1956

Marren v. Gamble, supra; S. v. Owen, 242 N.C. 525 , 88 S.E. 2d 832 . The “legislative body” of a municipality cannot delegate such power to a board of adjustment or to a zoning commission. James v. … Application for a variance permit invokes the discretionary power of the Board of Adjustment. Lee v. Board of Adjustment, supra; National Lumber Products Co. v. Ponzio, 133 N.J.L. 95 , 42 A. 2d 753 .

Vineberg v. . Day

152 N.C. 355 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1910

In Board of Education v. Commissioners, 150 N. … Ward v. Commissioners, 146 N. C., 534 ; Glenn v. Commissioners, 139 N. C., 412 ; Burton v. Furman, 115 N. C., 166 .” See Barnes v. Commissioners, 135 N. C., 27 .

Reed v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

209 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1936

In Public Laws of 1931, ch. 145, sec. 13, is the following: “The board of county commissioners of any county may, when in the opinion of said board the best interests of the people of said county or of any particular community … In the petition of the Board of Commissioners of Polk County is the following: “In the opinion of this board the best interests of the people of Polk County and of the particular communities which include the towns of Tryon

Keith v. . Henderson County

204 N.C. 21 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Board of Education v. Walter, 198 N. … Elliott v. Board of Equalization, 203 N. C., 749 . C.

Shelton v. Morehead Memorial Hospital

318 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 29, 1986

Documents and information which are otherwise immune from discovery under § 95 do not, *85 however, lose their immunity because they were transmitted to the board or Tinnell, or both. V. … (e) ad meetings or hearings of the Board of Trustees or any members of the Board of Trustees relating to Dr. Ross or Dr. Shapiro.

Booker v. Duke Medical Center

297 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 12, 1979

See, e.g., Board of National Missions v. Alaska Industrial Board, 116 F. Supp. 625 (D. … Div. 2d 887, 320 N.Y.S. 2d 650 (1971); North American Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Givens, 445 P. 2d 270 (Okla. 1968); St. Paul Insurance Co. v. Waller, 524 S.W. 2d 478 (Tenn. 1975); Brown Shoe Co. v.

Virginia & Carolina Southern Railroad v. McLean

158 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1912

Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 ; Hodges v. Telegraph Co., 133 N. C., 225 . … Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 ; R. R. v. Land Co., 137 N. C., 330 -335; Hollinsworth v. R. R., 63 Iowa, 443 ; Weyer v. R. R., 68 Wis., 180 ; So. Pa. R. R. v. San Francisco So.

State v. . Irvin

126 N.C. 989 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1900

In Asheville v. … In State v. Worth, 116 N.

State v. . Marsh

225 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1945

have been seen operating tbe boards, and, on one occasion, when tbe defendant was present. … See S. v. Everitt, 164 N. C., 399 , 79 S. E., 274 ; S. v. Hardin, 183 N. C., 815 , 112 S. E., 593 ; S. v. Pelley, 221 N. C., 487 , 20 S. E. (2d), 850 , and many others of like import.

Bundrick v. . Haygood

106 N.C. 468 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Brown v. Brown, 2 Murphey, 350; Rankin v. Rankin, 9 Ired., 156 ; Wester v. Wester, 5 Jones, 95; Haden v. Bradshaw, 1 Winst., 263; Smith v. Smith, 63 N. C , 637; Ired. on Ex’rs, 21.

Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-Salem

302 N.C. 550 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1981

Campbell v. First Baptist Church, 298 N.C. 476 , 259 S.E. 2d 558 (1979); Matter of Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4, 296 N.C. 1 , 249 S.E. 2d 698 (1978); Koontz v. … Jolly v. Wright, 300 N.C. 83 , 265 S.E. 2d 135 (1980); Williams v. Williams, 299 N.C. 174 , 261 S.E. 2d 849 (1980); State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v.

Ellis v. Trustees of the Graded School of Oxford

156 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 13, 1911

(Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. … Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N.

In Re Appeal of McElwee

304 N.C. 68 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

V. … Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 .

Vance S. Harrington & Co. v. Renner

236 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1952

Kinney v. Sutton, 230 N.C. 404 , 53 S.E.2d 306 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E.2d 128 , 168 A.L.R. 1 ; Appeal of Parker, 214 N.C. 51 , 197 S.E. 706 ; Elizabeth City v. … Martin v. Board of Com'rs of Wake, 208 N.C. 354 , 180 S.E. 777 ; Jones v. Madison County Com'rs, 137 N.C. 579 , 50 S.E. 291 .

Hankins v. . Hankins

202 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1932

Brown v. Brown, 124 N. C., 19 , 32 S. E., 320 ; Powell v. Benthall, 136 N. C., 145 , 48 S. E., 598 ; Cottle v. Johnson, 179 N. C., 426 , 102 S. E., 769 ; Rose v. Dean, 192 N. C., 556 , 135 S. E., 348 ; Hyatt v. … E., 807 ; Townsend v. Holderby, 197 N. C., 550 , 149 S. E., 855 .

Nelson v. Southern Railway Co.

170 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1915

Brown, 150 N. C., 535 . Railway v. Reynolds, 20 S. E., 70 , is on all-fours witb tbis. In tbat case a conductor bad gone back on tbe track for some necessary purpose, after stopping bis train. … R. v. Rieden, 107 S. W., 665 ; Kerrigan v. R. R., 194 Pa. St., 98.

Dale Ex Rel. Dale v. City of Morganton

270 N.C. 567 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1967

In Fulghum v. … There, the proprietor of a summer resort which had been furnishing water and light to the plaintiff’s cottage refused to continue to do so unless he built a septic tank approved by the Board of Health.