Case law

Taylor v. . Taylor

225 N.C. 80 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1945

S., 50-10; Ellis v. Ellis, 190 N. C., 418 , 130 S. E., 7 ; Moody v. Moody, post, 89. … Byers v. Byers, 223 N. C., 85 , 25 S. E. (2d), 466 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 196 S. E., 333 ; Pharr v. Pharr, 223 N. C., 115 , 25 S. E. (2d), 471 ; House v. House, 131 N. C., 141 , 42 S. E., 546 .

Teare v. . White

4 N.C. 210 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1815

"And now at this day, that is to say, on 26 October, until which day the plea aforesaid was continued, comes the said Peterson Brown, by William H. … NOTE. — Upon the first point, see Morgan v.

Owensby v. Owensby

312 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1984

Id.; Stanback v. Stanback, 270 N.C. 497 , 155 S.E. 2d 221 (1967). As we stated in Stadiem v. … See Brown v. Brown, 47 N.C. App. 323 , 267 S.E. 2d 345 (1980); Blair v. Blair, 44 N.C. App. 605 , 261 S.E. 2d 301 (1980); Rickenbaker v. Rickenbaker, 21 N.C. App. 276 , 204 S.E. 2d 198 (1974).

Jamison v. Kyles

271 N.C. 722 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1967

Hence it is that the findings of the board, when made in good faith and supported by evidence, are final. Little v. Raleigh, 195 N.C. 793 . Such findings of fact are not subject to review by the courts.” … The case of Freeman v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 264 N.C. 320 , 141 S.E. 2d 499 , again considered the authority of the Superior Court when reviewing proceedings of an administrative board.

State v. Lawrence

213 N.C. 674 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1938

Coble v. Comrs., 184 N. C., 342 ; Gunter v. Sanford, 186 N. C., 452 ; S. v. Yarboro, 194 N. C., 498 ; Plott v. Ferguson, 202 N. C., 446 ; Glenn v. Board of Education, 210 N. … In S. v.

Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.

221 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1942

E., 305 ; Tinker v. Rice Motors, 198 N. C., 73 , 150 S. E., 701 ; Brown v. Coal Co., 208 N. C., 50 , 178 S. E., 858 ; Schoenith, Inc., v. Mfg. Co., 220 N. C., 390 , 17 S. E. (2d), 350 ; Bangle v. Webb, 220 N. … Brown, 1 Canada, 360, relied upon by creditor, findings of fact as to authoritative communication are lacking.

Moody v. Transylvania County

271 N.C. 384 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967

See also Jenkins v. Henderson, supra; Burgin v. Smith, 151 N.C. 561 , 66 S.E. 607 , and Board of Managers v. … Hayes v. Benton, 193 N.C. 379 , 137 S.E. 169 ; Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N.C. 669 , 155 S.E. 562 ; Harris v. Board of Education, supra.” Also, in Thomas v.

State v. . Loftin

186 N.C. 205 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1923

S. v. Freeman, 86 N. C., 683 ; S. v. Hunter, 106 N. C., 796 ; S. v. McAfee, 107 N. C., 812 ; Sossamon v. Cruse, 133 N. C., 470 ; S. v. Rogers, 166 N. C., 389 . … S. v. Barrett, 123 N. C., 753 ; Wilkie v. R. R., 127 N. C., 203 .” In Merrell v. Dudley, 139 N.

Eason v. Spence

232 N.C. 579 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1950

Guy v. Harmon, 204 N.C. 226 , 167 S.E. 796 ; Williams v. Hedrick, 37 C.C.A. 552 , 96 F. 657 ; Rissberger v. Brown, 120 Ky. 142 , 85 S.W. 731 ; City of Louisville v. Kohnhorst, 25 Ky. L. Rep. 532, 76 S.W. 43 ; Falvey v. … Land Co. v. Board of Education, 101 N.C. 35 , 7 S.E. 573 ; Phelps v. Chesson, 34 N.C. 194 .

State v. Philip Morris Usa, Inc.

659 S.E.2d 7 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 2008

Roach v. City of Durham

204 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1933

S. v. Moore, 113 N. C., 698 ; S. v. Vanhook, 182 N. C., 831 . … Gatlin v. Tarboro, 78 N. C., 119 ; Worth v. R. R., 89 N. C., 291 ; S. v. Williams, 158 N. C., 611 ; Tea Co. v. Doughton, 196 N. C., 145 ; Tea Co. v. Maxwell, 199 N. C., 433 .

State v. Miller

272 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1967

S. v. Taylor, 84 N.C. 773 ; S. v. Sorrell, 98 N.C. 738 . (587).” In State v. … The State’s evidence tended strongly to show the defendant intentionally shot Bruce Browning through the heart. Browning was unarmed. In neither of his trials did the defendant testify or introduce evidence.

Orange County v. Heath

278 N.C. 688 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1971

See also Raleigh v. Morand, 247 N.C. 363 , 100 S.E. 2d 870 ; Zopfi v. City of Wilmington, 273 N.C. 430 , 160 S.E. 2d 325 ; In re Appeal of Parker, 214 N.C. 51 , 197 S.E. 706; Helms v. … In the case of Freeland v.

White v. . White

179 N.C. 592 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 19, 1920

ALLEN, J., dissenting; BROWN, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. … Bernhardt v. Brown, supra . The judgment in the second action to declare the defendant a trustee for his wife as to the other tract described in the complaint was regular in all respects.

Bacon v. Lee

353 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2001

The Oklahoma Constitution provided for a clemency petition to be reviewed by the Pardon and Parole Board (the Board) following an impartial investigation. Id. … Brown, The Quality of Mercy, 40 UCLA L. Rev. at 328-30 (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added).

Chowan County v. . Commissioner of Banks

202 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1932

The State Board of Assessment, “after careful consideration,” fixed the value for taxation at $19,375. In R. R. v. Lenoir County, 200 N. … R. v. Reid, 187 N. C., 320 ; R. R. v. Forbes, 188 N. C., 151 ; R. R. v. Cherokee County, 195 N. C., 756 .” Oliver v. Highway Commission, 194 N. C., 380 ; R. R. v. Cherokee County, 194 N. C., 781 .

Beanblossom v. Thomas

266 N.C. 181 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 14, 1966

Browning ever tell Conrad that the truck was only a car’s length behind the Falcon when the Chevrolet hit it. … Browning, whether we accept her version of it or that of Conrad.

Nance v. . Telegraph Co.

177 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1919

Plaintiff kept a boarding house and agreed for a consideration to take these employees of defendant as boarders, giving them such lodging and table board as he had theretofore furnished to his other boarders. … There was no special provision for better board or accommodations.

Wake Radiology Services, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services

365 N.C. 340 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

717 S.E.2d 376 (2011) WAKE RADIOLOGY SERVICES, LLC d/b/a Wake Radiology Northwest Raleigh Office v. … Browning, Raleigh, for Pinnacle Health Services of North Carolina, LLC.

Keith v. . Henderson County

204 N.C. 21 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Board of Education v. Walter, 198 N. … Elliott v. Board of Equalization, 203 N. C., 749 . C.