Case law

Johnson v. . Marrow

228 N.C. 58 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1947

Lenoir County v. Crabtree, 158 N. C., 357 , 74 S. E., 105 ; Fountain v. Pitt County, 171 N. C., 113 , 87 S. E., 990 . … Cabe v. Alderman, 185 N. C., 158 , 116 S. E., 419 ; Parker v. Commissioners, 178 N. C., 92 , 100 S. E., 244 .

In re Briggs

135 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1904

. *123 In Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S., 591 , Congress bad, under the intimation in Counselman v. … The same view is expressed in Brown v. Walker, 161 U.

Keen v. Parker

217 N.C. 378 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1940

E., 656 ; Board of Education v. Comrs., 192 N. C., 274 , 134 S. E., 852 ; Ellis v. Ellis, 193 N. C., 216 , 136 S. E., 350 . … Bass, supra, Brown, J., said: “The law presumes the attorneys bad tbe necessary authority and the burden is on the party seeking to set aside a consent judgment to prove that no such authority existed.” 2.

In re McCarroll

313 N.C. 315 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1985

Love v. Moore, 305 N.C. 575, 578 , 291 S.E. 2d 141, 144 (1982); Equitable Leasing Corp. v. Myers, 46 N.C. App. 162 , 265 S.E. 2d 240 (1980). … The trial court denied the applicant’s motion that his appeal from the Board’s order be heard by a jury and that Board Rule .1404 be declared unconstitutional.

Snyder v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue

217 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1940

Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky , 217 U.S. 563 , 54 L.Ed., 833 ; Sproles v. Binford , 286 U.S. 374 , 76 L.Ed., 1167 ; Whitney v. California , 274 U.S. 357 , 71 L.Ed., 1095 . … Cooley on Taxation, section 353, p. 752; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, supra , affirming 125 Ky. 402 , 101 S.W. 321 ; 12 Am. Jur., p. 193 , and cases cited; 26 R. C. L., p. 228; S. v.

Griggs v. . Sears, Roebuck Co.

218 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1940

Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N. C., 368 , 8 S. E. (2d), 199 ; Schwingle v. Kellenberger, 217 N. C., 577 , 8 S. E. (2d), 918 ; Fox v. Tea Co., 209 N. C., 115 , 182 S. E., 662 ; Bowden v. Kress & Co., 198 N. … Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., supra; Schwingle v. Kellenberger, supra; Anderson v. Amusement Co., 213 N. C., 130 , 195 *169 S. E., 386; Parker v. Tea Co., 201 N. C., 691 , 161 S. E., 203 ; Bowden v. Kress, supra.

Marshburn v. . Purifoy

222 N.C. 219 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1942

Brown v. Gogdell, 136 N. C., 32 , 48 S. E., 515 ; Edgerton v. Games, 142 N. C., 223 , 55 S. E., 145 ; Fairley v. Abernathy, 190 N. C., 494 , 130 S. E., 184 . See also Annotations 126 A. L. R., 1190 (n). In Brown v. … The present action is distinguishable in factual situation from the cases of Woodard v. Sauls, supra; Clow v. McNeill, 167 N. C., 212 , 83 S. E., 308 ; Piano Co. v. Newell, 177 N. C., 533 , 98 S. E., 774 ; Guy v.

Leonard v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue

216 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1939

Belk Bros. v. Maxwell , 215 N.C. 10 ; Land Co. v. Smith , 151 N.C. 70 , 65 S.E. 641 ; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky , 217 U.S. 563 . … Bickett v. State Tax Com., supra; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York , 303 U.S. 573 ; State Board of Tax Comrs. v. Jackson , 283 U.S. 527 , 73 A.L.R., 1464 ; Kidd v. Alabama , 188 U.S. 730 .

McLaughlin v. Beasley

250 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959

Board of Education, 242 N.C. 584 , 89 S.E. 2d 144 ; Edwards v. Board of Education, 235 N.C. 345 , 70 S.E. 2d 170 ; Kistler v. Board of Education, 233 N.C. 400 , 64 S.E. 2d 403 ; Kirby v. … Thus, plaintiffs seek to -enjoin the exercise of 'authority possessed by the Un-ion County Board of Education and by it alone. Kistler v. Board of Education, supra.

State v. Dobbins

306 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 1982

On 11 June 1981 Sergeant Brown signed a “return” of the search warrant. Defendant argues that under Mapp v. … In State v.

In Re the Appeal of Hasting

252 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1960

Petitioner appealed to the Board of Adjustment. It heard the evidence offered and found: “4. … Hence it is that the findings of the board, when made in good faith and supported by evidence, are final. Little v. Raleigh, 195 N. C. 793 . Such findings of fact are not subject to review by the courts.”

ST. JOHN CHRISTIAN HOLINESS CHURCH OF GOD v. Hines

362 N.C. 475 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2008

James River Equipment, Inc. v. Tharpe's Excavating, Inc.

361 N.C. 167 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2006

Southgate v. . Elfenbein

184 N.C. 129 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1922

And in Bernhardt v. Brown, 122 N. … Brown v. Rich ard, 107 N. C., 645 . The judgment of nonsuit will be set aside, and the cause referred to another jury. Beversed.

Bray v. . Barnard

109 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Only one penalty is given against each Commissioner composing the Board, if he fails to perform his duty in such respect. … Hewlett v. Nutt, 79 N. C., 263 .

Fishel v. . Browning

145 N.C. 71 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1907

The said deed contains the following covenants: "And the said Howard Browning and wife covenant to and with the said D. A. … Cited: Bethell v. McKinney , 164 N.C. 75 ; Taylor v. Meadows 169 N.C. 126 . *Page 59

Town of Carolina Beach v. Mintz

212 N.C. 578 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1937

Thus it was held by this Court in Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N. C., 566 , 17 S. … J., in Davidson v. Guilford, 152 N. C., 436 , 67 S.

Jones v. . Jones

46 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1854

Scholfield, 6 Term Rep. 691; Brown v. Dula, 3 Murp. Rep. 574. … v.

Buncombe Turnpike Co. v. M'Carson

18 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1835

Scroter v. Harrington, 1 Hawks, 192 . … In The Bank of the United States v.

Harrill v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

271 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967

See also, Motley v. Board of Barber Examiners, 228 N.C. 337, 344 , 45 S.E. 2d 550, 554 , and Bryant v. Woodlief, 252 N.C. 488, 498, 114 S.E. 2d 241, 248 . … Also, see Maybury v. Coyne, 312 S.W. 2d 455 (Ky.).