Case law

Mauldin v. McAden

234 N.C. 501 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1951

This view is supported by the decision of this Court in Feezor v. … In Waldrop v.

State v. Wilkerson

164 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1913

C., 25 ; Ross v. Cotton Mills, ibid., 115; Board of Education v. Makely, 139 N. C., 31 ; Overcash v. Electric Co., 144 N. C., 572 ; Winslow v. Hardwood Co., 147 N. C., 275 . … The case of Commonwealth v. Williams ( 6 Gray, 1 ) supports this view.” In Board of Excise v. Merchant, 103 N.

State Ex Rel. Battle v. City of Rocky Mount

156 N.C. 329 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1911

S. v. Wittsberger, 5 Wheat., 76 ; U. S. v. Harlwill, 6 Wall., 386 ; S. v. Barco, 150 N. C., 792, 796 ; Fortune v. Commissioners, 140 N. C., 322 ; S. v. Eaves, 106 N. C., 752 ; Adams v. Turrentine, 30 N. C., 147, 150 . … S. v. Commissioners, 4 N. C., 419 ; S. v. Williams, 34 N. C., 172 ; S. v. Commissioners, 48 N. C., 399 ; S. v. Furguson, 76 N. C., 197 .

Jones v. Commissioners.

135 N.C. 218 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1904

But if that be conceded, yet, as held in Ewbank v. … Ducker v. Venable , 126 N.C. 447 ; R. R. v. Jenkins , 68 N.C. 503 . A better founded exception is that the act, Laws 1903, chapter 289, is not mandatory.

Barden v. . R. R.

152 N.C. 318 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1910

BROWN and WALKER, JJ., concur in result. Action heard on demurrer to the complaint. … R. v. Zeiler , 54 Kan. 340 ; R. R. v. Artist , 60 Fed., 365 ; Powers v. Hospital , 109 Fed., 294 ; Maine v. R. R. , 109 Iowa 260 ; York v. R. R. , 98 Iowa 544 ; Quinn v. R. R. , 94 Tenn. 713 ; R. R. v.

Burton v. Belvin

142 N.C. 151 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1906

Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C., 245 ; and cases there cited. … Brown v. Kinsey, supra, is exactly in point. Corbett v. Clute, 137 N. C., 546 , which holds that a bond given as consideration for the suppression of a criminal prosecution is null and void, has no application.

State v. Curtis

230 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1949

Thus the District Board of Health is a creature of the Legislature, and has only such powers and authority as are given to it by the Legislature. Utilities Comm. v. Greyhound Corp., 224 N.C. 293 , 29 S.E. 2d 909 . … Express Co. v. R. R., 111 N.C. 463 , 16 S.E. 393 ; S. v. R. R., 141 N.C. 846 , 54 S.E. 294 ; Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N.C. 7 , 128 S.E. 593 ; Efird v. Commrs. of Forsyth, 219 N.C. 96 , 12 S.E. 2d 889 ; Pue v.

Leonard v. . Sink

198 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1929

Sutton v. Phillips , 116 N.C. at p. 504; Hinton v. State Treasurer, ante , at p. 499." S. v. Revis , 193 N.C. 192 ; 50 A.L.R., 98 ; Board of Commissioners of McDowell County v. Assell , 194 N.C. 412 . In Cabe v. … The same view is upheld in Commissioners v. Lucas , 93 U.S. 108 . Jones v. Commissioners , 143 N.C. 59 . See Board of Trustees v. Webb , 155 N.C. 379 ; Commissioners v. Commissioners , 157 N.C. 514 ; Woodall v.

In Re Incorporation of Indian Hills, Jackson Co.

280 N.C. 659 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

At the time the Court of Appeals reversed the Board’s incorporating order, the act creating the Board had been repealed and the Board had been abolished unless saved by Chapter 1225. … Milk Commission v.

Robinson v. Lamb.

129 N.C. 16 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1901

Anders v. Anders, 49 N. C., 243 ; Minor v. Harris, 61 N. C., 322, 325 . We, therefore, have the ferry in question properly established by lawful authority before the passage of the Act of 1901. … Dunham v. Anders, 128 N. C., 207 . However, we do not mean to say that the plaintiff had acquired such a vested right as was free from legislative interference. That question was practically settled in Robinson v. Lamb.

Fletcher v. . Comrs. of Buncombe

218 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1940

Robinson v. Comrs. , 182 N.C. 590 , 109 S.E. 855 ; Galloway v. Board , 184 N.C. 245 , 114 S.E. 165 ; Trustees v. Trust Co. , 181 N.C. 306 , 107 S.E. 130 ; Sechrist v. Comrs. , 181 N.C. 511 , 107 S.E. 503 . … Hood, Comr., v. Realty, Inc. , 211 N.C. 582 , 191 S.E. 410 ; S. v. Brockwell , 209 N.C. 209 , 183 S.E. 378 ; Glenn v. Board of Education , 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 ; Albertson v.

Jones v. Henderson Tobacco Co.

231 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1949

The plaintiff seeks to hold the Henderson Tobacco Company liable for his injuries on several theories, but his case is left without substance as against the Tobacco Company by the testimony of his own witness, Alton Brown … The plaintiff cites Brown v. Truck Lines, 221 N.C. 299, 42 S.E. 2d 11, but tbe principle upon which that case was decided would seem to be inapplicable to tbe facts of tbe'present record. Affirmed.

Sidney Spitzer & Co. v. Commissioners of Franklin County

188 N.C. 30 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 21, 1924

Court when the case of Cooper v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 231 , was decided. … Browne on Sinking Fund.

Leonard v. Sink

198 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1929

Sutton v. Phillips, 116 N. C., at p. 504; Hinton v. State Treasurer, ante, at p. 499.” S. v. Revis, 193 N. C., 192 ; 50 A. L. R., 98; Board of Commissioners of McDowell County v. Assell, 194 N. C., 412 . In Cabe v. … Tbe same view is upheld in Commissioners v. Lucas, 93 U. S., 108 . Jones v. Commissioners, 143 N. C., 59 . See Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. C., 379 ; Commissioners v. Commissioners, 157 N. C., 514 ; Woodall v.

State Ex Rel. Meador v. Thomas

205 N.C. 142 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 12, 1933

(Ewart v. Jones, 116 N. … Vide S. v. Gales, 77 N. C., 283 ; White v. Murray, 126 N.

Lunn v. . Shermer

93 N.C. 164 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1885

In Brown v. … Brown v. Jones, supra.

Osborne v. . Canton and Kinsland v. . MacKey

219 N.C. 139 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1941

Howerton v. Tate , 68 N.C. 546 ; Kreitz v. Behrensmeyer (Ill.), 36 N.E. 983 ; Booker v. Donohoe (Va.), 28 S.E. 584 . In Howerton v. … In Kreitz v.

Haugh v. County of Durham

365 N.C. 328 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

Russell Capps v. COUNTY OF DURHAM, Ellen W. Reckhow, Chairman of the Durham County Board of Commissioners, in her official capacity, Michael D. … Page, Vice-Chairman of the Durham County Board of Commissioners, in his official capacity; and Lewis A. Cheek, Phillip R. Cousin, Jr., and Becky M.

Thompson v. . Umberger

221 N.C. 178 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1942

Gruber v. Eubanks, 197 N. C., 280 , 148 S. E., 246 , and cases cited. … Hodges v. Stewart, 218 N. C., 290 , 10 S. E. (2d), 723 , and cases cited.

State v. Cobb

Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 2022

STATE V. … v.