Case law

State v. McCall

286 N.C. 472 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1975

At trial, Deputy Sheriff Hubert Brown was permitted to testify as follows regarding an alleged statement made by the defendant at that time. “Q. … (Emphasis supplied.) .', (¡ ,, Prior to permitting Deputy Brown to give the áboye testimony before the jurors, the trial court conducted a voir dire examination.

Carolina & Yadkin River Railroad v. Armfield

167 N.C. 464 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1914

R. v. McLean, 158 N. C., 498 ; Lambeth v. Power Co., 152 N. C., 371 ; Abernethy v. R. R., 150 N. C., 91 ; Thomason v. R. R., 142 N. C., pp. 300 and 318; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 ; R. R. v. Land Co., 137 N. … McLean v. R. R., supra; Brown v. Power Co., supra; Chicago v. Taylor, 125 U. S., 161 ; Gainsville R. R. v. Hall, reported in 9 L. R. A., 209; 78 Tex., 169 ; Telegraph Co. v. Darst, 192 Ill., 47 , reported in 85 Am.

State v. Lofton

372 N.C. 216 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 2019

Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984) (citing State v. Childers, 41 N.C. … Brown, 310 N.C. at 568, 313 S.E.2d at 588.

Alexander v. . Lowrance

182 N.C. 642 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1921

Navigation Co. v. Neal, 10 N. C., 520 ; Burke v. Elliott, 26 N. C., 355 ; Comrs. v. McDaniel, 52 N. C., 107 ; Rogers v. Powell, 174 N. C., 388 . … L., 1061; S. v. Melton, 44 N. C., 49 ; Cecil v. High Point, 165 N. C., 431 ; Mfg. Co. v. Andrews, ib., 285.

Trivette v. Yount

366 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2012

We begin by considering defendant’s argument that, as an agent of the local school board, he was plaintiff’s employer. The parties agreed at oral argument that defendant was an agent of the board. See also Abell v. … local board on a day to-day basis.

McIntyre v. Josey

239 N.C. 109 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1953

See, also, in this connection: Butner v. Keelhn, 51 N.C. 60 ; Howcott v. Warren, 29 N.C. 20 ; Molton v. Miller, 10 N.C. 490 ; Browne v. Blick, 7 N.C. 511 ; Cutlar v. Brown, 3 N.C. 182 ; M'Alister v. … The exact question under consideration arose in the case of Shields v.

ERWIN MILLS v. Textile Workers Union of America, CIO

234 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1951

&A. v. O’Brien, 339 U.S. 454 , 94 L. ed. 978; Amalgamated Asso. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 383 , 95 L. Ed. 364 . … In International Union v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 336 U.S. 245 , 93 L.

State v. . O'Briant

188 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1924

Brown, on Main Street, with his samples of candy in sample case, which he displayed to said Brown and took an order for a box of candy in an unbroken package, and after taking said order, and delivering a copy to said Brown … S. v. Miller, 93 N. C., 511 ; Robbins v. Shelby Taxing Dist., 120 U. S., 489 ; Emert v. Missouri, 156 N. S., 296; S. v. Lee, 113 N. C., 681 ; Greensboro v. Williams, 124 N. C., 167 ; S. v. Frank, 130 N. C., 724 .

State v. Payne

337 N.C. 505 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 9, 1994

See State v. Boyd, 311 N.C. 408, 421 , 319 S.E.2d 189, 198 (1984) (quoting State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 178 , 293 S.E.2d 569, 586 (1982)), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1030 , 85 L. Ed. 2d 324 (1985). … State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 70 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 829 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1165 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986), overruled on other grounds by State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570 , 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988).

Wharton v. City of Greensboro

146 N.C. 356 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1907

Lilly v. Taylor, 88 N. C., 490 ; Jones v. Commissioners, 137 N. C., 592. In the well-considered opinion of Mr. … Brodnax v. Groom, supra; Fawcett v. Mount Airy, 134 N. C., 125 ; Wilson v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 748 ; Tucker v. Commissioners, 75 N. C., 274 . We are of opinion that this issue is valid.

State v. Hernandez

360 N.C. 539 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006

In Re Appeal of Tadlock

261 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1964

Johnson v. Board of Education, 241 N.C. 56 , 84 S.E. 2d 256 ; Jarrell v. *124 Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 . … In Commissioners v.

State Ex Rel. Ledwell v. Proctor

221 N.C. 161 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1942

Cohoon v. Swain, 216 N. C., 317 , 5 S. E. (2d), 1 . In canvassing tbe returns and judicially determining tbe result tbe board of canvassers must pass upon tbe legality of any disputed ballots. Burgin v. … E., 817 ; S. v. Jackson, 183 N. C., 695 , 110 S. E., 593 ; Gohoon v. Swain, supra.

Abernathy v. . Phifer

84 N.C. 711 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1881

The allowance of a claim by a county board of commissioners is not final and conclusive. Such an allowance is only prima facie evidence of the correctness of the claim. In the case of Commissioners v. … It may be reexamined by the board itself, and on appeal may be examined or disallowed in whole or in part by the court, and it. is error to instruct the jury that the allowance of a claim by the board is an adjudication as

State v. Tolley

290 N.C. 349 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 14, 1976

Kennedy v. Cardwell, supra; United States v. Samuel, supra; Commonwealth v. Brown, supra; State v. Roberts, supra. … Kennedy v. Cardwell, supra; United States v. Samuel, supra; Commonwealth v. Brown, supra; State v. Roberts, supra.

City of Asheville v. Frost

370 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 2018

City of Asheville v. Frost, ___ -2-  CITY OF ASHEVILLE V. FROST Opinion of the Court N.C. … See State v. Jones, 305 N.C. 520, 531, 290 S.E.2d 675, 681 (1982).

Rexford v. . Phillips

156 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 1912

Section 5233 provides that if the owner fails to list at the appointed time, the chairman of the board of commissioners shall list the same, in the name *Page 175 of the owner, by inserting in the tax list the description … Smith , 158 N.C. 263 ; Fields v. Brown , 160 N.C. 299 ; Winn v. Finch , 171 N.C. 276 . *Page 179

Lowery v. School Trustees.

140 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1905

Peckham, J., in People v. Terry, 108 N. … Berry v. Haines, 4 N. C., 311 ; Darby v. Wilmington, 76 N. C., 133 ; Cotton Mills v. Waxhaw, 130 N. C., 293 . The difficulty is usually found in the application of the rule.

Masters v. . Gardner

50 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1858

Brown v. Brown, J Jones’ Rep. 126, is decisive of this point. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

State v. W. O. Sanders.

153 N.C. 624 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1910

This was held as far back as Brown v. Frazier, 5 N. C., 421 , which was cited and approved in Whitley v. Gaylord, 48 N. … C., 290 , where Pearson, J., says: “If the court may stop the proceeding and direct an action to be brought (which conflicts with Brown v. Frazier, 5 N.