Case law

McIntyre v. Josey

239 N.C. 109 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1953

See, also, in this connection: Butner v. Keelhn, 51 N.C. 60 ; Howcott v. Warren, 29 N.C. 20 ; Molton v. Miller, 10 N.C. 490 ; Browne v. Blick, 7 N.C. 511 ; Cutlar v. Brown, 3 N.C. 182 ; M'Alister v. … The exact question under consideration arose in the case of Shields v.

Alexander v. . Lowrance

182 N.C. 642 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1921

Navigation Co. v. Neal, 10 N. C., 520 ; Burke v. Elliott, 26 N. C., 355 ; Comrs. v. McDaniel, 52 N. C., 107 ; Rogers v. Powell, 174 N. C., 388 . … L., 1061; S. v. Melton, 44 N. C., 49 ; Cecil v. High Point, 165 N. C., 431 ; Mfg. Co. v. Andrews, ib., 285.

State v. . Ballance

229 N.C. 764 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1949

such applicant, and if an applicant shall fail to satisfy the Board in any or all of these respects, the Board may decline to admit said applicant to examination, or to issue license." … may offend the undefined ethical standards of the Board.

Abbott Realty Co. v. City of Charlotte

198 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1930

the board of commissioners, or reduced to writing and approved by the board, or expressly authorized by ordinance or resolution adopted by the board. … McPhail v. Commissioners, 119 N. C., 330 , 25 S. E., 958 . There was error in the judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit. The judgment must be Eeversed.

Hinson v. Britt

232 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1950

Jordan v. Harris, 225 N.C. 763 , 36 S.E. 2d 270 . … Scott v. Bryan, 210 N.C. 478 , 187 S.E. 756 ; Pemberton v. Greensboro, 205 N.C. 599 , 172 S.E. 196 ; 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, section 1689. Affirmed.

Newbern v. . Fisher

198 N.C. 385 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1930

S., 987; Browne on the Statute of Frauds (5 ed.), p. 197; Reed on the Statute of Frauds, Vol. I, p. 235; Jones v. Bacon, 145 N. Y., 446 , 40 N. E., 216 ; Reed v. Holcomb, 31 Conn., 360 ; Mills v. … Brown, 11 Iowa, 314 ; Resseter v. Waterman, 151 Ill., 169 ; Keesling v. Frazier, 119 Ind., 185 ; Hawes v. Murphy, 191 Mass., 469 ; Noyes v. Ostrom, 113 Minn., 111 ; Alphin v. Lowman, 115 Va., 441 .

Gunter v. Town of Sanford

186 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 14, 1923

C., 484 , which is not’affected on this point by Board of Education v. Remide, 160 N. C., 568 . … Davidson v. Board of Admrs. of New Orleans, 96 U. S., 97 ; 24 Law Ed., 616.

Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

285 N.C. 344 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 15, 1974

Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Co., supra; Brown v. Fletcher’s Estate, 210 U.S. 82 , 28 S.Ct. 702 , 52 L.Ed. 966 ; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U.S. 14 , 23 S.Ct. 237 , 47 L.Ed. 366 ; Thormann v. … Under the alleged additional term, it could not do so but would be confined to a presentation of its claim to a board of arbitration in New York.

Osborne v. . Calvert

83 N.C. 365 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880

Barretz v. Patterson, Tay., 37; Cartel v. Sams, 4 Dev. and Bat., 182; Stevens v. Brown, 82, N. C., 460. II. … “Parol evidence is not only admissible,” says Pearson, J., in Brown v.

Thompson v. . Wiggins

109 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Wilson v. Arentz, 70 N. C., 670 ; Jones v. Carter, 73 N. C., 148 ; Morris v. Morris, 94 N. C., 613 . Houston v. Brown, 52 N. C., 161 ; Teague v. Downs, 69 N. C , 280; Jones v. Cohen, 82 N. C., 75 ; and State v. … The Code, §§ 1838, 1839; Houston v. Brown, supra. The husband may sell such interest, Long v. Graeber, 64 N. C., 431 , and it is liable to sale under execution against him after his wife’s death. McCaskill v.

Town of Smithfield v. City of Raleigh

207 N.C. 597 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1935

S., 7125, are: Durham v. Cotton Mills, 141 N. C., 615 , 54 S. E., 453 ; Shelby v. Power Co., 155 N. C., 196 , 71 S. E., 218 ; Board of Health v. Commissioners, 173 N. C., 250 , 91 S. E., 1019 .

State v. McBane

276 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1969

of county commissioners, or (2) by the board of county commissioners on recommendation of the county planning board, or (3) by the county planning board. … In Deese v.

Winston-Salem Fire Fighters Club, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

259 N.C. 582 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

This statement of the law was quoted with approval by Browning, J., speaking for the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia in Aldridge v. Piedmont Fire Ins. Co., 33 S.E. 2d 634 , 158 A.L.R. 892 . … Zoning Board, 114 A. 2d 331 , 52 A.L.R. 2d 1093 , said: “A ‘club,’ of which there are many different types, is, in substance, merely an organization or association of persons who meet or live together for the purpose of social

Brumley v. Baxter

225 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1945

In Brown v. Commissioners, 223 N. C., 744 , 28 S. E. (2d), 104 , it was said the Legislature may not “lawfully authorize a municipal corporation to pay gifts or gratuities out of public funds.” … Holmes v. Fayetteville, 197 N. C., 740 , 150 S. E., 624 ; Nash v. Monroe, 198 N. C., 306 , 151 S. E., 634 ; Mewhorn v. Kinston, 199 N. C., 72 , 154 S. E., 76 ; Burleson v. Board of Aldermen of Spruce Pine, 200 N.

Trivette v. Yount

366 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2012

We begin by considering defendant’s argument that, as an agent of the local school board, he was plaintiff’s employer. The parties agreed at oral argument that defendant was an agent of the board. See also Abell v. … local board on a day to-day basis.

Norwood v. . Branch

4 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1816

Overruled: Brown v. Brown , 37 N.C. 311 ; Johnston v. Johnston , 39 N.C. 11 ; Donnell v. Mateer , 40 N.C. 11 ; Jerkins v. Mitchell , 57 N.C. 210 , 211 . *Page 305

Bunch v. Commissioners of Randolph County

159 N.C. 335 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

of Trustees v. … C., 383 ; Crocker v. Moore, 140 N. C., 429 ; Tate v. Commissioners, 122 N.

Lyles v. City of Charlotte

344 N.C. 676 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1996

Co. v. … Justice Orr, writing for the majority, quoted with approval Brown v.

State v. . Ledford

203 N.C. 724 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1932

Brown, ante, 513), but for an error, presently appearing, which requires that the bill of indictment be quashed or the action abated. S. v. Crowder, 193 N. C., 130 , 136 S. E., 337 ; S. v. Branch, 68 N. C., 186 . … Compare S. v. Harris, 91 N. C., 658 ; S. v. Brown, 81 N. C., 568 . Tbe plea in abatement should have been sustained. S. v. Crowder, supra.

Lowery v. School Trustees.

140 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1905

Peckham, J., in People v. Terry, 108 N. … Berry v. Haines, 4 N. C., 311 ; Darby v. Wilmington, 76 N. C., 133 ; Cotton Mills v. Waxhaw, 130 N. C., 293 . The difficulty is usually found in the application of the rule.