Case law

Langley v. Staley Hosiery Mills Co.

194 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1927

The jury was instructed, in accordance with the rule approved in Brown v. Chemical Co., 162 N. … Morrow v. Mills, 181 N. C., 423 ; Brown v. Chemical Co., supra. But we do not find in the record before us any sufficient evidence of the defendant’s consent to this effect.

Fidelity Bank v. Wysong & Miles Co.

177 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1919

So that, upon a fair and proper construction of the verdict, which should be read in the light of the evidence and what presumably was the charge (Southerland v. Brown, 176 N. C., 187 ; Jones v. R. R., 176 N. … Bunn v. Todd, supra, has frequently been approved since it was decided, tbe two most recent cases which expressly endorse its statement of tbe rule and apply it being Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , and Pope v.

Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Payne

342 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996

Harris, 279 N.C. 288, 297 , 182 S.E.2d 345, 350 (1971) (quoting Foster v. Hyman, 197 N.C. 189, 191 , 148 S.E. 36, 37 (1929)) (emphasis added); see also O.S. Steel Erectors v. Brooks, 84 N.C. … Brooks v. Ansco & Assoc., 114 N.C.

Nichols v. . Bell

46 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1853

This objection-is answered by the .cases of Miller v. Irwin, 1st Dev. and Bat. 103. Cooper v. Chambers, 4 Dev. 281 . Adcock v. Fleming, 2 Dev. & Bat. 223 . Ashford v. Robinson, 8 Ired. 116 . 3 Kent’s Com. 122. … Here the plaintiff is described, as being neither black nor white, but of a brown color, between that of an African and a mulatto.

Matter of Elkins

308 N.C. 317 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1983

Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977); see also Baker v. Varser, 240 N.C. 260 , 82 S.E. 2d 90 (1954). … Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E. 2d 816 (1976). However, the rules of evidence before an administrative board permit more latitude than is allowed in court proceedings. Campbell v.

State v. Holloman.

139 N.C. 642 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1905

Elliott R. & S. (2nd Ed.), sec. 424; State v. Summerfield, 107 N. C., 895 . And its being put into effect can be made dependent upon the action of the board of supervisors. State v. Barringer, 110 N. C., 525 ; State v. … State v. Sharp, 125 N. C., 632, 634 . Under this statute, the State prosecutes for the misdemeanor and the board of supervisors can sue for the penalty. State v. Parker, 91 N. C., 650 ; State v. Bloodworth, 94 N.

Henderson v. . McLain

146 N.C. 329 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1907

Dunavant v. Railroad, 122 N. C., 1001 , and cases there cited. The refusal of the Superior Court to set aside the report of a referee on the ground of newly discovered evidence is not reviewable. Vest v. Cooper, 68 N. … Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 , where this section is analyzed. As Avas said in Jones v. Emory, 115 N.

Jerkins v. . Mitchell

57 N.C. 207 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

See Walton v. Walton, 14 Ves. Jun. 324; Brown v. Brown, 2 Ired. Eq. 309 . A different rule was laid down by the Supreme Court, under its former organization, in the case of Norwood v. Branch, 2 Car. … That case was, however, brought into doubt by this Court in deciding the above-mentioned case of Brown v. Brown , and was entirely over-ruled in the subsequent one of Johnston v. Johnston, 4 Ired. Eq. 9.

North Carolina School Boards Ass'n v. Moore

359 N.C. 474 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2005

Thornburg v. … In Shore v.

Fowler v. Valencourt

334 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 1993

. § 1-52(13), this Court in Brown v. … National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control, 268 N.C. 624 , 151 S.E.2d 582 (1966); State ex rel. Utilities Comm. v. Union Electric Membership Corp., 3 N.C. App. 309 , 164 S.E.2d 889 (1968).

City of Asheville v. Frost

370 N.C. 590 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 2018

City of Asheville v. Frost, ___ -2-  CITY OF ASHEVILLE V. FROST Opinion of the Court N.C. … See State v. Jones, 305 N.C. 520, 531, 290 S.E.2d 675, 681 (1982).

Peeler v. . Peeler

109 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 373 ; Bump, on F. C., pp. 6, 318; Stephenson v. Felton, 106 N. C., 120 ; Osborne v. Wilkes, 108 N. C., 669 ; Woodruff v. Bowles, 104 N. C , 213; Bigelow on Fraud, 136. … Brown v. Mitchell, supra; McLeod v. Bullard, 84 N. C., 515 .

Town of Hendersonville v. Price

96 N.C. 423 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

Ryan v. Martin, 91 N. C., 467 , and cases there cited. II. For the second position, the defendants rely on the-authority of Commissioners of Wilmington v. Roby, 8 Ired., 255 ; and The Commissioners of Raleigh v. … In the case of The Commissioners of Raleigh v.

In Re Appeal of McLean Trucking Co.

281 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1972

Central Railroad Company of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania, supra. … Billings Transfer Co. v. Davidson, supra.

Town of Smithfield v. City of Raleigh

207 N.C. 597 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1935

S., 7125, are: Durham v. Cotton Mills, 141 N. C., 615 , 54 S. E., 453 ; Shelby v. Power Co., 155 N. C., 196 , 71 S. E., 218 ; Board of Health v. Commissioners, 173 N. C., 250 , 91 S. E., 1019 .

State v. Cummings

323 N.C. 181 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1988

State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40 , 337 S.E. 2d 808 . The preferred method for proving a prior conviction includes the introduction of the judgment itself into evidence. State v. … State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 202-03 , 358 S.E. 2d 1, 17 .

Henry v. . Hilliard

155 N.C. 372 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1911

Browne on Stat. … Browning v. Berry, 107 N. C., 235 ; Jordan v. Furnace Co., 126 N. C., 147 ; Winders v. Hill, 144 N. C., 617 .

W. P. Love & Co. v. Young

69 N.C. 65 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

v. … The concluding general remarks of Justice Boyden, in Brown v.

State v. Jolley

312 N.C. 296 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 . 3 He thereupon secured the residence by roping it off and posting signs. He thereby lawfully seized the rifle. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 502 (1983).

Newbern v. . Fisher

198 N.C. 385 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1930

S., 987; Browne on the Statute of Frauds (5 ed.), p. 197; Reed on the Statute of Frauds, Vol. I, p. 235; Jones v. Bacon, 145 N. Y., 446 , 40 N. E., 216 ; Reed v. Holcomb, 31 Conn., 360 ; Mills v. … Brown, 11 Iowa, 314 ; Resseter v. Waterman, 151 Ill., 169 ; Keesling v. Frazier, 119 Ind., 185 ; Hawes v. Murphy, 191 Mass., 469 ; Noyes v. Ostrom, 113 Minn., 111 ; Alphin v. Lowman, 115 Va., 441 .