Case law

Ballenger Paving Co. v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

258 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1963

Fetner v. Granite Works, 251 N.C. 296 , 111 S.E. 2d 324 ; Brice v. Salvage Co., 249 N.C. 74 , 105 S.E. 2d 439 . … Childress v. Trading Post, 247 N.C. 150 , 100 S.E. 2d 391 . Damages were not an issue.

State v. . Baskerville

141 N.C. 811 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1906

jurisdiction as follows: *Page 618 ( a ) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all offenses arising from the violation of the provisions of this act, or of all violations of ordinances, by-laws, rules, and regulations of the board … Brown , 159 N.C. 469 ; S. v. Dunlap, ib. , 493; S. v. Lawing , 164 N.C. 497 ; S. v. Tate , 169 N.C. 374 ; Oil Co. v. Grocery Co., ib. , 522; Faison v. Comrs. , 171 N.C. 415 ; S. v. Boyd , 175 N.C. 792 . *Page 623 (820)

B. W. Ballard & Co. v. Johnson

114 N.C. 141 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

C., 48 ) and “ all advancements made and expenses incurred in making and saving said crops ” (Brown v. Brown, 109 N. … This view is assumed to be correct in Thigpen v. Maget, 107 N.

Whitaker v. Cover.

140 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1905

If there were any irreconcilable conflict between the decision in Brown v. … Upon this showing, it is not necessary to disturb Brown v. House, as our case comes clearly within the' exception. But the learned counsel confidently relied on Harry v. Graham, 18 N.

Application of Rea Construction Company

272 N.C. 715 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1968

Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 . … Lee v. Board of Adjustment, supra.

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect.

672 S.E.2d 24 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 2009

672 S.E.2d 24 (2009) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 6, 2009. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins. Co.

Jackson v. . Browning

224 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1944

S., 567), and annotations; Lincoln v. R. R., infra. (2) Is there, in plaintiff’s own evidence, such a clear inference of contributory negligence that reasonable minds could not come to a contrary conclusion? Lincoln v. … E., 601 ; Mulford v. Hotel Co., 213 N. C., 603 , 197 S. E., 169 ; Pearson v. Stores Corp., 219 N. C., 717, 721 , 14 S. E. (2d), 811 . Tbe evidence does not require extensive analysis for tbe purpose of this decision.

Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Martin

203 N.C. 620 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1932

In Lee and others v. … In Chamberlain v.

Armstrong Ex Rel. Martin Ex Rel. Martin v. Armstrong

235 N.C. 733 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952

Brown v. Brown, 195 N.C. 315 , 142 S.E. 4 ; Bolling v. Barbee, 193 N.C. 787 , 138 S.E. 163 ; Darden v. Matthews, 173 N.C. 186 , 91 S.E. 835 . … Hallyburton v. Carson, 86 N.C. 290 ; 57 Am. Jur., Wills, Sec. 608, p. 417. And tbe testator’s intent in making the codicil may be found in tbe codicil itself. Homer v. Brown, 16 U.S. 354 , 14 L. Ed. 970 .

Garrison v. Southern Railway Co.

150 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1909

We hold that, upon well-settled rules of construction, proper allowance is. made for the difficulties suggested by Judge Brown. In this case the statute is not applied to interstate commerce. The case of Railroad v. … Justice Brown in Railroad v. Illinois, 177 U.

McCormac v. Commissioners of Robeson

90 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

State v. Jones , 1 Ired., 414 ; Mills v. Williams , 11 Ired., 558 ; Love v. Schenck , 12 Ired., 304 ; Taylor v. Commissioners , 2 Jones' Eq., 141; Manly v. Raleigh , 4 Jones' Eq., 370; Hill v. … Commissioners , 67 N.C. 367 ; Com'rs of Currituck v. Com'rs of Dare , 79 N.C. 565 ; Watson v. Commissioners , 82 N.C. 17 ; Cooley Const. Lim., 191-2-3; 1 Dill. Mun.

State v. Whittle Communications

328 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1991

Plaintiffs cite Guthrie v. … V, § 2(1). Therefore, we conclude that the contract does not violate article V, § 2(1).

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

672 S.E.2d 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2009

672 S.E.2d 681 (2009) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 3, 2009. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins.

Carter v. . R. R.

165 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1914

The Court held, in Browne v. R. … Browne v. R. R. , 108 N.C. 34 ; Hutchison Carriers, sec. 641. In Lambeth v. R.

County of Lancaster v. Mecklenburg County

334 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1993

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E.2d 129 (1974); Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476 , 128 S.E.2d 879 (1963). … Woodhouse v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 211 , 261 S.E.2d 882 (1980); Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 278 N.C. 17 , 178 S.E.2d 616 (1971); In re Ellis, 277 N.C. 419 , 178 S.E.2d 77 ; Jackson v.

Smith v. Beasley

298 N.C. 798 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1979

Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co., 268 N.C. 23 , 149 S.E. 2d 625 (1966). Where facts are stipulated, they are deemed established as fully as if deter *801 mined by jury verdict. Moore v. … Koury v. Follo, 272 N.C. 366 , 158 S.E. 2d 548 (1968). In weighing the credibility of the testimony, the jury has the right to believe any part or none of it. Brown v. Brown, 264 N.C. 485 , 141 S.E. 2d 875 (1965).

State Prison of N. C. v. Day

124 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1899

C., 369 ; Wood v. Bellamy supra; Ward v. Elizabeth City, 121 N. … Wood v. Bellamy and Hoke v. Henderson, supra; Cotton v. Ellis, 52 N. C., 545 .

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

670 S.E.2d 904 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 9, 2008

670 S.E.2d 904 (2008) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 9, 2008. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins.

Allen v. . Carr

210 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1936

Mann v. N. C. State Board of Examiners in Optometry et al., 206 N. C., 853 . The Supreme Court of the United States, in Graves v. State of Minn., 272 U. … S. v. Van Doran, 109 N. C., 864 ; S. v. Call, 121 N. C., 643 ; S. v. Lockey, 198 N. C., 557 (Barber’s Act).

In re T.L.H.

368 N.C. 101 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 2015

See State v. … State v. Hennis, 323 N.C. 279, 285, 372 S.E.2d 523, 527 (1988) (citation omitted).