Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

2.09s

  • Caldwell County v. . Doughton

    195 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

    Tbe said board shall constitute a State board of equalization of valuation and taxes. … Sash Co. v. Parker, 153 N. C., 130 ; Kornegay v. Goldsboro, 180 N. C., 441 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Parker v. County of Anson

    237 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 30, 1953

    McAden, 234 N.C. 501 , 67 S.E. 2d 647 ; Atkins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 752 , 51 S.E. 2d 484 ; Johnson v. Marrow, 228 N.C. 58 , 44 S.E. 2d 468 ; Board of Education v. Lewis, 231 N.C. 661 , 58 S.E. 2d 725 ; Kreeger v. … Drummond, 235 N.C. 8 , 68 S.E. 2d 800 ; Edwards v. Board of Education, 235 N.C. 345 , 70 S.E. 2d 170 ; Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N.C., 74 , 167 S.E. 454 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Hoffman

    348 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 9, 1998

    State v. Quick, 341 N.C. 141, 145 , 462 S.E.2d 186, 189 (1995). … The trial court thus did not err with regard to prospective juror Brown.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

    668 S.E.2d 903 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 2008

    668 S.E.2d 903 (2008) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 21, 2008. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. . Haid

    118 N.C. 481 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

    That issue was in these words: “ Was the said Lawrence Brown, deceased, at the time of making the said deed of sound mind and disposing memory?” which the jury answered “No.” … State v. Fuller, 114 N. C., 885 .

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Rodwell v. . Rowland

    137 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1905

    BROWN, J., dissenting. … S. v. Orvis , 20 Wis. 248 ; People v. Hartwell , 12 Mich. 508 ; S. v. Cowles, supra; (634) S. v. Shirving , 19 Neb. 497 ; S. v. Thayer, supra .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • George v. Town of Edenton

    294 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1978

    Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, supra, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974). … See Williams v. City of San Bruno, 31 Cal. Rptr. 854 (Cal. App. 1963); Johnson v. Board of County Com’rs., 34 Colo.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Hoyle

    263 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

    Jones v. Mathis, 254 N.C. 421, 425 , 119 S.E. 2d 200 , and cases cited. In our view, the record does not support plaintiffs’ contention that Judge Gambill entered judgment on the pleadings. … Bruton v. Light Co., 217 N.C. 1, 7 , 6 S.E. 2d 822 , and cases cited; King v. Neese, 233 N.C. 132, 136 , 63 S.E. 2d 123 , and cases cited; Hayes v. Ricard, 251 N.C. 485, 494 , 112 S.E. 2d 123 ; Bowen v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • McQueen v. Peoples National Bank

    111 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1892

    Armfield v. Brown, 70 N. C., 27 ; The Code, § 391. The province of the jury is restricted to passing upon issues of fact raided by the pleadings in the light of the testimony offered. … Armfield v. Brown, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Herring v. . Dixon

    122 N.C. 420 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1898

    Williams v. Commissioners, 119 N. C., 520 ; Board of Education v. Commissioners, 107 N. C., 110 ; Jones v. Commissioners, Ibid 248; Barksdale v. Commissioners, 93 N. C., 472 ; Cromartie v Commissioners, 87 N. … Broadnax v. Groome, supra; Williams v. Commissioners, supra; Evans v. Commsssioners, supra; Halcombe v. Commissioners, 89 N. C., 346 .

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Jarvis v. Vanderford

    116 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1895

    Tunstall v. Cobb, 109 N. C., 316 ; State v. Allen, Hawks, 6. This disposes of defendant’s first exception, and also of the second exception, so far as we can see. … Brown v. Brown, 106 N. C., 451 ; Davis v. Higgins, 91 N. C., 382 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Commissioners of McDowell County

    70 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1874

    Brown and A. M. Finley be authorized to execute bonds for the amount, and affix the seal of the county, and the bunds so executed shall be valid.” … Campbell v. the city of Kenosha, 5 Wallace, 194, and the cases cited under the head of “ Ketroactive Statutes.” No error. Per Oubiam. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

    668 S.E.2d 901 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 2008

    V. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 13, 2008. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. Brown, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins. Co. Mack Sperling, John S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benzein v. . Robinett

    16 N.C. 444 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1830

    But if he does not enter for seven, or t\v* nty years, provided the tenant for life 1¡ ves so ionu;, Ire may afterwards, upon the death of the- tenant for lif-, enter by virtue of his remainder, whirl) has fallen into possession … John Brown has a remedy at Law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gore v. Columbus County

    232 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1950

    Feezor v. Siceloff, ante, 563; Atkins v. McAden, 229 N.C. 752 , 51 S.E. 2d 484 ; Board of Education v. Pegram, 197 N.C. 33 , 147 S.E. 622 ; Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N.C. 753 , 130 S.E. 621 ; Davenport v. … Board of Education, 183 N.C. 570 , 112 S.E. 246 ; School Commissioners v. Aldermen, 158 N.C. 191 , 73 S.E. 905 ; Venable v. School Committee, 149 N.C. 120 , 62 S.E. 902 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jarvis v. . Vanderford

    116 N.C. 148 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

    Brown v. Brown , 106 N.C. 451 ; Davis v. Higgins , 91 N.C. 382 . … Headen v. Womack , 88 N.C. 468 . There is no error, and the judgment is Affirmed. Cited: Ratliff v. Ratliff , 131 N.C. 431 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Austin v. Brunnemer

    266 N.C. 697 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1966

    Chambers v. Board of Adjustment, 250 N.C. 194 , 108 S.E. 2d 211 ; Winston-Salem v. Coach Lines, 245 N.C. 179 , 95 S.E. 2d 510 ; Belk’s Department Store v. Guilford County, 222 N.C. 441 , 23 S.E. 2d 897 . … Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 , 168 A.L.R. 1 ; Mullen v. Louisburg, 225 N.C. 53, 33 S.E. 2d 484 ; Pue v. Hood, 222 N.C. 310, 22 S.E. 2d 896 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Doe on Demise of Stowe v. Davis

    32 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1849

    Bradshaw v. Ellis, 2 Dev. & Bat. … But as we had occasion.to say in the late case of Barnes v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Bryan v. Patrick

    124 N.C. 651 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1899

    the word “Governor” from the Board. … State v. Kennon, 7 Ohio St., 716 ; United States v. Hartwell, 6 Wall., 385 ; Howerton v. Tote. 68 N.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Saunders

    236 N.C. 162 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1952

    Eubanks had ample room to turn (Brown v. Products Co., Inc., supra). … Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 227 N.C. 412 , 42 S.E. 2d 593 ; Brown v. Products Co., Inc., 222 N.C. 626 , 24 S.E. 2d 334 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.