Case law

Overby v. Fayetteville Building & Loan Ass'n

81 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

Smith v. Brown, 3 Hawks, 580 ; Brown v. Brooks, 7 Jones, 93 ; Wilson v. Derr, 69 N. C., 137 ; Reynolds v. Magness, 2 Ire., 26. 7. … Indeed, it may be questioned, as the correctness of the opinion in Armfield v. Brown, 70 N.

Stancil v. Stancil

255 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1961

Holden v. Holden, supra; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129 , 37 S.E. 2d 118 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 . … Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N.C. 620 , 194 S.E. 278 ; Davis v. Davis, supra; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N.C. 181 , 22 S.E. 2d 576 ; Smith v. Smith, 247 N.C. 223 , 100 S.E. 2d 370 . It will be noted in Davis v.

Copper ex rel. Copper v. Denlinger

363 N.C. 784 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 2010

See Corum v. … But see Patsy v. Bd. of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 516 , 73 L.

French v. . Commissioners of New Hanover

74 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

The power of the Board is express and plenary. … If there is a surplus, after discharging the claim of $16,500, the Board cannot appropriate it to their own, or to other uses than the payment of the bonded debt.

Atkins v. . McAden

229 N.C. 752 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1949

Johnson v. Marrow, 228 N. C. 58 , 44 S. E. (2) 468. … G.S. 115-85; Venable v. School Committee, 149 N. C. 120 , 62 S. E. 902 ; School Commissioners v. Aldermen, supra; Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N. C. 753 , 130 S. E. 621 ; Board of Education v. Pegram, 197 N.

Newton v. School Committee of Charlotte

158 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1912

Jeffress v. Greenville, 154 N. C., 499 ; Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 150 N. C., 116 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. C., 128 ; Ward v. Commissioners, 146 N. C., 534 ; Small v. Edenton, 146 N. … C., 527 ; Tate v. Greensboro, 114 N. C., 392 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 .

Bishop v. Glazener

245 N.C. 592 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1957

Brown v. Brown, 124 N.C. 19 , 32 S.E. 320 ; Johnston v. Johnston, 213 N.C. 255 , 195 S.E. 807 ; Monen v. Monen, 64 S.D. 581 , 269 N.W. 85 , 108 A.L.R. 404 ; Glatstein v. … Anno. 108 A.L.R., p. 413 et seq., where cases are cited from 27 states, including our case of Brown v. Brown. In Woodhouse v.

Dickens v. . Barnes

79 N.C. 490 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1878

In Capps v. Holt, 5 Jones, Eq., 153, the call was for “ a tract of 150 acres lying on watery branch in Johnson county; and that was held to be too vague. In Hinchey v. Nichols, 72 N. … In Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 , this Court held the description was susceptible of explanation, and was therefore sufficient.

Young v. Commissioners of Rowan County

194 N.C. 771 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1927

Yarious phases of special tax elections have been considered by tbis Court in tbe following cases: Howell v. Howell, 151 N. C., 575 ; Gill v. Comrs., 160 N. C., 176 ; Key v. Board of Education, 170 N. … C., 123 ; Wilson v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 638 ; Plott v. Comrs., 187 N. C., 127 ; Sparkman v. Comrs., 187 N. C., 244 ; Causey v. Guilford County, 192 N. C., 298 ; Flake v. Comrs., 192 N. C., 590 .

Land Bank v. . Garman

220 N.C. 585 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1942

IV, sec. 1, Bonnett-Brown Corp. v. Coble , 195 N.C. 491 , 142 S.E. 772 , and cases cited. … Miller v. Leach , 95 N.C. 229 ; Bonnett-Brown Corp. v. Coble, supra .

Brooks v. McWhirter Grading Co., Inc.

303 N.C. 573 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 17, 1981

In Todd Shipyards Corp. v. … The Potlatch definition of “repeatedly” was adopted by the Fifth Circuit in Bunge Corp. v. Secretary of Labor, 638 F. 2d 831 . The North Carolina Safety and Health Review Board addressed this issue in Brooks v.

Matternes v. City of Winston-Salem

286 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974

Gorrell v. … In Council v.

Wallston v. . Braswell

54 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1853

Dearle v. Hall, 3 Russ. 1, 3 Eng. Cond. Chan. … After-wards Brown assigned .the whole annuity to Hall.: before completing the purchase, Hall enquired of the executor if' Brown"had a ri^ht to assign, and was informed that he had.

State v. Hipps

348 N.C. 377 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 9, 1998

Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 65 , 337 S.E.2d 808, *410 826-27 (1985), [cert, denied, 476 U.S. 1164 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986), overruled on other grounds by State v. … Brown, 315 N.C. at 65 , 337 S.E.2d at 827 .” State v. Sexton, 336 N.C. 321, 373 , 444 S.E.2d 879, 908-09 (quoting State v. Gibbs, 335 N.C. 1, 61-62 , 436 S.E.2d 321, 356 (1993), cert, denied, 512 U.S. 1246 , 129 L.

State Ex Rel. Cromartie v. Parker

121 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

Land Co. v. Beatty, 69 N. C., 329 ; Logan v. Wallis, 76 N. C., 416 ; Street v. Tuck, 84 N. C., 605 ; Doughty v. Railroad, 78 N. C., 22 ; Hodges v. Railroad, 105 N. C., 170 . … The action does not go to the power or authority of the Board to act in any way as a Board, but to the separate right of each individual defendant to remain a member of that Board.

State v. Barnhill

359 N.C. 191 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 2004

607 S.E.2d 646 (2004) 359 N.C. 191 STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas Maynard BARNHILL. No. 535P04. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 2, 2004. Angela H. Brown, Greenville, for Brown. Patricia A.

Stevens v. Southern Railway Co.

187 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1924

Fisher v. Lumber Co., 183 N. C., 485 ; Pennsylvania Co. v. Dolan, 6 Ind. App., 109 ; Lead Co. v. Kinlin, 47 Neb., 409 ; McMullen v. Dickinson Co., 63 Minn., 405 ; Carnig v. Carr, 35 L. R. A. (Mass.), 512; Texas C. R. … Todd v. Machis, 160 N. C., 352 ; Brown v. Brown, 182 N. C., 42 ; S. v. Jones, 182 N. C., 781 . After a careful examination of tbe record we find no reversible error.' No error.

King v. . King

225 N.C. 639 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1945

E., 439 ; Chemical Co. v. Bass, 175 N. C., 426 , 95 S. E., 766 ; Chavis v. Brown, 174 N. C., 122, 93 S. E., 471 ; Cox v. Boyden, 167 N. C., 320 , 83 S. E., 246 . … Deitz v. Bolch, supra; Chavis v. Brown, supra. And the fact that the plaintiff may have inadvertently overlooked the legal effect of the judgment does not entitle him to the relief he now seeks.

Braswell v. . Morehead

45 N.C. 26 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1852

Wilcox v. Wilcox, 1 Ire. Eq., 36—Brown v. Wilson, 6 Ib., 558. … Brown v. Wilson, ubi supra. The plaintiff is clearly entitled to the hires and profits of the slaves and other property bequeathed to her, until the event shall happen, upon which they are limited over to the aunts.

In Re the Appeal of King

281 N.C. 533 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1972

Hoskins v. Hoskins, 259 N.C. 704 , 131 S.E. 2d 326 ; Rider v. Lenoir County, 238 N.C. 632 , 78 S.E. 2d 745 ; Horner v. Chamber of Commerce, 236 N.C. 96 , 72 S.E. 2d 21 ; Trust Co. v. … In Rider v. Lenoir County, supra, this Court, speaking through Justice Barnhill, later Chief Justice, concerning the decision in Horner v.