Case law

In Re the Appeal of Reeves Broadcasting Corp.

273 N.C. 571 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1968

Belks Department Store, Inc., v. Guilford County, supra. Abuse of discretion is not shown, and error of law prejudicial to the taxpayer does not appear. … In re Wallace, 267 N.C. 204 , 147 S.E. 2d 922 ; Vance v. Hampton, 256 N.C. 557 , 124 S.E. 2d 527 ; Hertford v. Harris, 263 N.C. 776 , 140 S.E. 2d 420 ; Lowe v. Jackson, 263 N.C. 634 , 140 S.E. 2d 1 .

Suiter v. . Brittle

90 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Smith v. Lyon, 82 N. C., 2 ; Brown v. Williams, 83 *21 N. C., 684; Brown v. Williams, 84 N. C., 116 ; Wiley v. Lineberry, 88 N. C., 68 ; State v. O’Kelly, 88 N. C., 609 ; State v. Randall, 88 N. C., 611 .

Kirby v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

368 N.C. 847 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 2016

App. at 436-39, 725 S.E.2d at 661-63), and that the “mere recording of project maps do[es] not constitute a taking” (citing, inter alia, Browning v. N.C. … See Town of Midland v. Wayne, 368 N.C. 55, 66, 773 S.E.2d 301, 309 (2015) (stating that “development rights” are “an important feature of the condemned land and not a separate, compensable property right”); Brown v.

Newton v. School Committee of Charlotte

158 N.C. 186 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1912

Jeffress v. Greenville, 154 N. C., 499 ; Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 150 N. C., 116 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. C., 128 ; Ward v. Commissioners, 146 N. C., 534 ; Small v. Edenton, 146 N. … C., 527 ; Tate v. Greensboro, 114 N. C., 392 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 .

Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union County

317 N.C. 51 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

Durham County v. Addison, 262 N.C. 280 , 136 S.E. 2d 600 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 . … In Atkins v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Union County, 53 N.C.

Stancil v. Stancil

255 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1961

Holden v. Holden, supra; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129 , 37 S.E. 2d 118 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 . … Dyer v. Dyer, 212 N.C. 620 , 194 S.E. 278 ; Davis v. Davis, supra; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N.C. 181 , 22 S.E. 2d 576 ; Smith v. Smith, 247 N.C. 223 , 100 S.E. 2d 370 . It will be noted in Davis v.

State v. Gordon

287 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1975

State v. Brown, 282 N.C. 117 , 191 S.E. 2d 659 (1972). The constitutional right to a speedy trial prohibits arbitrary and oppressive delays by the prosecution. State v. Brown, supra; State v. … State v. Brown, supra; State v. George, 271 N.C. 488 , 156 S.E. 2d 845 (1967).

State Ex Rel. Cromartie v. Parker

121 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

Land Co. v. Beatty, 69 N. C., 329 ; Logan v. Wallis, 76 N. C., 416 ; Street v. Tuck, 84 N. C., 605 ; Doughty v. Railroad, 78 N. C., 22 ; Hodges v. Railroad, 105 N. C., 170 . … The action does not go to the power or authority of the Board to act in any way as a Board, but to the separate right of each individual defendant to remain a member of that Board.

Page Trust Co. v. Rose

192 N.C. 673 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926

In Ward v. … In Cherry v.

Trustees of the L. C. Wagner Trust v. Barium Springs Home for Children, Inc.

330 N.C. 187 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1991

Curl v. AMERICAN MULTIMEDIA

665 S.E.2d 741 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2008

665 S.E.2d 741 (2008) CURL, et al. v. AMERICAN MULTIMEDIA, et al. No. 21P08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 26, 2008. Guy W. Crabtree, Mark E. Fogel, Durham, for Earl Brown & Emma Brown. James F.

NORTHAMPTON CTY. DRAINAGE D. v. Bailey

326 N.C. 742 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1990

Wooten, Jr. and Browning, Sams, Poole, Hill & Hilburn by Robert R. Browning and P. Gwynett Hilburn, Greenville, for plaintiff appellee. Baker, Jenkins & Jones, P.A. by Ronald G. Baker, Ahoskie, for defendants. … We cannot hold that the decision as to how a governing board of a drainage district is chosen is a ministerial act.

Overby v. Fayetteville Building & Loan Ass'n

81 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879

Smith v. Brown, 3 Hawks, 580 ; Brown v. Brooks, 7 Jones, 93 ; Wilson v. Derr, 69 N. C., 137 ; Reynolds v. Magness, 2 Ire., 26. 7. … Indeed, it may be questioned, as the correctness of the opinion in Armfield v. Brown, 70 N.

Fuller v. . Lockhart

209 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

Lacy v. Bank, 183 N. C., 373 ; Lovelace v. Pratt, 187 N. C., 686 ; Frazier v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 49 ; Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin, 194 N. C., 768 .” Elliott v. Board of Equalization, 203 N. C., 749 . … Clark v. McQueen, 195 N. C., 714 (716); Crabtree v. Board of Education, 199 N. C., 645 (650).

Lewis v. . Archbell

199 N.C. 205 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930

French v. . Commissioners of New Hanover

74 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

The power of the Board is express and plenary. … If there is a surplus, after discharging the claim of $16,500, the Board cannot appropriate it to their own, or to other uses than the payment of the bonded debt.

State v. Hoffman

348 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 9, 1998

State v. Quick, 341 N.C. 141, 145 , 462 S.E.2d 186, 189 (1995). … The trial court thus did not err with regard to prospective juror Brown.

Jarvis v. Vanderford

116 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1895

Tunstall v. Cobb, 109 N. C., 316 ; State v. Allen, Hawks, 6. This disposes of defendant’s first exception, and also of the second exception, so far as we can see. … Brown v. Brown, 106 N. C., 451 ; Davis v. Higgins, 91 N. C., 382 .

Commissioners v. . Trust Co.

143 N.C. 110 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1906

State v. Deliesseline, 10 S. C., 52. … State v. McBride, 4 Mo., 308 . See also Stanford v. Ellington, 77 N. C., 255.

Speck v. North Carolina Dairy Foundation, Inc.

311 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 1984

Flippin v. Jarrell, 301 N.C. 108 , 270 S.E. 2d 482 (1980). … E.g., Vigitron, Inc. v. Ferguson, 419 A. 2d 1115 (N.H. 1980); Amoco Production Co. v. Lindley, 609 P. 2d 733 (Okla. 1980); Whites’ Electronics, Inc. v. Teknetics, Inc., 677 P. 2d 68 (Or. App. 1984); Stevens v.