Case law

COBB EX REL. KIGHT v. Town of Blowing Rock

722 S.E.2d 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 2012

Cobb, Father of Plaintiff, Individually v. TOWN OF BLOWING ROCK, a Municipal Corporation, and City of Blowing Rock, a Municipal Corporation. No. 300A11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … . *480 Brown Moore & Associates, PLLC, Charlotte, by R. Kent Brown, for plaintiff-appellees. Clawson & Staubes, PLLC, Charlotte, by Andrew J. Santaniello and Summer D. Eudy, for defendant-appellant Town of Blowing Rock.

Ponder v. Joslin

262 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1964

Burgin v. Board of Elections, supra. … Hayes v. Benton, 193 N.C. 379 , 137 S.E. 169 ; Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N.C. 669 , 155 S.E. 562 ; Harris v. Board of Education, supra.” Hinshaw v. McIver, 244 N.C. 256 , 93 S.E. 2d 90 ; Watson v.

Clark Millinery Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance

160 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1912

Borretts v. Patterson, 1 N. C., 27 ; Stevens v. Brown, 82 N. C., 460 . … Brown v. Brown, supra.

State v. . Hall

97 N.C. 474 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

State v. Fishblate, 83 N. C., 654 ; State v. Commissioners, 2 Car. Law Rep., 419 (617); State v. Commissioners, 3 Jones, 399 . … ) creating that board.

State v. Etheridge

319 N.C. 34 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1987

Brown and his threat to “fix” her face, “although they may have induced fear, appeared to have been unrelated to the act of sexual intercourse between Brown and the defendant.” … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 53 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1977); State v. Revelle, 301 N.C. 153 , 270 S.E. 2d 476 (1980).

State Ex Rel. Walser v. Bellamy

120 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

Hoke v. Henderson, supra; King v. Hunter, 65 N. C.. 693; Cotten v. Ellis, 52 N. C., 545 ; Bailey v. Caldwell, 68 N. C., 472 ; Bunting v. Gales, 77 N. C., 283 . … Nichols v. McKee, 68 N. C., 429 . The Act did not in fact abolish the offices changing the name of the board, although the Act declared that the Board of Directors was abolished.

American Trust Co. v. Nicholson

162 N.C. 257 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 13, 1913

Curtis v. Brown, 29 Ill., 230 ; Weld v. Weld, 23 R. I., 318; Johns v. Johns, 172 Ill., 470 ; Conkling v. Washington Univ., 2 Md. Ch., 504; Stanly v. Colt, 72 U. S., 169 ; Jones v. Habersham, 107 U. S., 183 ; Gavin v. … The jurisdiction and power of a court of chancery in this respect were the subject of discussion in this Court in Curtiss v. Brown, 29 Ill., 201 ; Voris v. Sloan, 68 id., 588, and Hale v.

Lee v. . Rhodes

227 N.C. 240 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1947

McDonald v. Howe, 178 N. C., 257 , 100 S. E., 427 ; Brown v. Harding, 170 N. C., 253 , 86 S. E., 1010 ; Bond v. Wool, 113 N. C., 20 , 18 S. E., 77 ; Keener v. Goodson, 89 N. C., 273 ; Matthews v. Joyce, 85 N. … McDonald v. Howe, supra; Brown v. Harding, supra; Ferrell v. Hales, 119 N. C., 199 , 25 S. E., 821 ; Grantham v. Kennedy, 91 N. C., 148 ; Logan v. *242 Harris, 90 N. C., 8 ; Jacobs v. Burgwyn, 63 N. C., 193 ; Davis v.

Hyder v. . Hyder

215 N.C. 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1939

S. v. May, 132 N. C., 1021 .” … Reynolds v. Reynolds, 208 N. C., 428 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 . In the trial we find No error.

State v. . Graham

194 N.C. 459 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1927

He came up there, and he put his foot upon the running board and he talked to who was in there, but mind you I didn't know it was Hector Graham. … Burke v. Elliott , 26 N.C. 355 ; Gilliam v. Riddick, ibid. , 368; S. v. Speaks , 95 N.C. 689 ; S. v. Turner , 119 N.C. 841 ; S. v. Hall, supra; S. v. Wood , 175 N.C. 809 ; S. v. Montague , 190 N.C. 841 .

Tate v. . Bates

118 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

The same point was raised in Solomon v. Bates, post , 311, and Caldwell v. … Hauser v. Tate , 85 N.C. 81 ; Morse on Banks, sec. 137; Finn v. Brown , 142 U.S.; United Society v. Underwood , 9 Bush. (Ky.), 609, and other cases cited in Solomon v. Bates, post , 322.

Spiers v. Davenport

263 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1964

Property owners dissatisfied with values equalized by the Board may appeal to the State Board of Assessment. G.S. 105-329. … Williams v. Comrs., 182 N.C. 135 , 108 S.E. 503 ; Wolfenden v. Comrs., 152 N.C. 83 , 67 S.E. 319 ; Fromkin v. State, 63 N.W. 2d 332 ; State v.

Avery v. . Strother

1 N.C. 558 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1802

Cited: Strother v. Cathey , 5 N.C. 164 ; Stanmire v. Powell , 35 N.C. 315 ; Barnett v. Woods , 58 N.C. 433 ; Harris v. Norman , 96 N.C. 62 ; Brown v. Brown , 103 N.C. 216 ; Gilchrist v. … Middleton , 107 N.C. 679 ; Brown v. Smathers , 188 N.C. 174 . NOTE. — See on the first point, Lunsford v. Bostion , 16 N.C. 483 . See, also, act, 1 Rev.

Andrews v. Haygood

665 S.E.2d 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 2008

665 S.E.2d 457 (2008) ANDREWS v. HAYGOOD. No. 57A07-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 23, 2008. Molly A. Orndorff, Burlington, for Charlie Brown, Trustee. Susannah Holloway, for NCDHHS. Timothy P. … Appellant (Charlie Brown, Trustee) shall have up to and including the 4th day of August 2008 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of July 2008."

Allison v. . Allison

56 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1857

The cases cited by the plaintiffs’ counsel of Kirkpatrick v. Rogers, 6 Ire. Eq. Rep. 135; Hudson v. Pierce, 8 Ire. Eq. Rep. 126, and Lea v. … The reason for the distinction is stated in Lea v. Brown, and need not be here repeated. Our opinion then is, that the legacy to John G.

State v. Fernandez

346 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1997

Brown immediately notified Major Freeman, who was working on the case, that defendant had asked to speak with Brown. … Sheriff Brown contacted Prosecutor Andrews, who advised Brown that the code of ethics would not permit him to talk with defendant.

Greene v. Spivey

236 N.C. 435 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1952

Rader v. Queen City Coach Co., supra; Brown v. L. H. Bottoms Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 65 , 40 S.E.2d 476 ; Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc., 225 N.C. 580 , 35 S.E.2d 869 . See also Town of Burnsville v. … Board of Trustees of Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E.2d 137 , as distinguished from a subcontractor of the class designated by the statute. Beach v. McLean, 219 N.C. 521 , 14 S.E.2d 515 ; Evans v.

State v. Diaz

317 N.C. 545 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 12, 1986

. *547 State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 587 (1984) (citations omitted). “It is immaterial whether the substantial evidence is circumstantial or direct, or both.” State v. … was on board at the time marijuana was being transported.

State v. . Voight

90 N.C. 741 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

State v. Moore, 1 Jones, 276 . … State v. Collins, 3 Dev., 117; State v. Reid, 1 Dev. & Bat., 377 . But assuming the rule to be that when the evidence contained!

Jernigan v. State

279 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1971

A similar result was reached in Koyce v. United States Board of Parole, 306 F. 2d 759 (D.C. … In Zerbst v.