Case law

State v. Stevens

252 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1960

S. v. Shepherd, 230 N.C. 605 , 55 S.E. 2d 79 ; S. v. Crump, 209 N.C. 52 , 182 S. E. 716 . Moreover, the law does not sanction a conditional plea of nolo con-tendere. S. v. Horne, 234 N.C. 115 , 66 S.E. 2d 665 ; S. v. … The defendants contend that the judgments are void; that the law prescribes a sentence not in excess of twelve months for larceny from the person, citing S. v. Brown, 150 N.C. 867 , 64 S.E. 775 .

Hobbs v. County of Moore

267 N.C. 665 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1966

State v. Morrison, 210 N.C. 117 , 185 S.E. 674 ; State v. Partlow, 91 N.C. 550 ; Drake v. Drake, 15 N.C. 110 . … In Lowery v.

King v. Baldwin

276 N.C. 316 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 11, 1970

Snow v. Board of Architecture, 273 N.C. 559 , 160 S.E. 2d 719 ; Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C. 9 , 112 S.E. 2d 758 ; St. George v. Hanson, 239 N.C. 259 , 78 S.E. 2d 885 ; Harris v. … Board of Education, 216 N.C. 147 , 4 S.E. 2d 328 ; Moreland v. Wamboldt, 208 N.C. 35 , 179 S.E. 9 ; Hickory v. Catawba Co., 206 N.C. 165 , 173 S.E. 56 ; Bunn v. Maxwell, 199 N.C. 557 , 155 S.E. 250 .

State v. Harrington

335 N.C. 105 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1993

The court dismissed Juror Brown. It asked counsel to offer any objections, but none were made. Defendant argues that State v. Drake, 31 N.C. … State v. Bonney, 329 N.C. 61, 83 , 405 S.E.2d 145, 158 (1991). As to juror Brown, the court dismissed him.

Byers v. . Byers

223 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1943

Reynolds v. Reynolds , 208 N.C. 428 , 181 S.E. 338 ; Brown v. Brown , 213 N.C. 347 , 196 S.E. 333 ; Hyder v. Hyder , 215 N.C. 239 , 1 S.E.2d 540 . … Medlin v. Medlin , 175 N.C. 529 , 95 S.E. 857 ; Brown v. Brown , 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Price v. Edwards , 178 N.C. 493 , 101 S.E. 33 ; 30 Am.Jur., 925.

Burgin v. Richmond & Danville Railroad

115 N.C. 673 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

Browne v. Railroad Co., 108 N. C., 34 ; Hutchinson on Carriers. sec. 641. In Lambeth v. Railroad Co., 66 N. … Walker v. Railroad Co., 41 La. Am., 795; Jewell v. Railroad, 54 Wis., 610 ; Railroad Co. v. Morris, 31 Grat., 200; Nelson v. Railroad, 68 Mo., 593 ; 2 Wood’s Railway Law, 1133.

State v. . Wilson

218 N.C. 769 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1941

In S. v. … rear, before Browning could get on the shoulders, he having seen defendant coming at a fast rate of speed through his rear-view mirror.

McLane v. . Manning

60 N.C. 608 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

Edney v. King , 39 N.C. 465 ; Lackay v. Curtis , 41 N.C. 199 . … Cited: Harshaw v. McCombs , 63 N.C. 77 ; Gilmer v. Hanks , 84 N.C. 320 ; Stout v. McNeill , 98 N.C. 3 ; Anderson v. Rainey , 100 N.C. 334 .

Brevard Land & Timber Co. v. Kinsland

154 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1910

C., 639 ; S. v. R. R., 141 N. C., 846 ) ; but its physical location must remain the subject-matter of proof. … Assuming, as we must from the records accessible to us and considered by this Court in Brown v. Brown, 103 N. C., 213 ; s. c., on rehearing, 103 N. C., 221 , and Brown v. Brown, 106 N.

In Matter of Rogers

297 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1979

Accord Martin-Trigona v. Underwood, 529 F. 2d 33 (7th Cir. 1975); State v. … Underwood v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 278 N.C. 623 , 181 S.E. 2d 1 (1971).

Neaves v. North State Mining Co.

90 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Browne Stat. … Browne Stat. Frauds, §3706. To the sanie effect are Johnson v. Dodge, 17 Ill., 433 ; Curtis v. Blair, 26 Miss., 309 ; McWharter v. McMahan, 10 Paige (N. Y.), 386; Champlin v. Parish, 11 Ib., 405.

State v. Harris

181 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

Cameron v. Power Co., 137 N. C., 101; S. v. Journigan, 120 N. C., 568 ; S. v. Hart, 116 N. C., 977 ; Paper Co. v. Chronicle, 115 N. C., 147 ; Allen v. McLendon, 113 N. C., 319 ; S. v. Debnam, 98 N. C., 712 ; S. v. … C., 982 ; S. v. Miller, ib., 902; S. v. Gay, ib., 821; McCoy v. Lassiter, ib., 131.

In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.

219 N.C. 735 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1941

In Rosenthal v. Goldsboro, 149 N. … They are res judicata even upon a petition to the board of adjustment to reopen and rehear upon the same evidence. Little v. Raleigh, supra.

Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 2015

, HAYWOOD  RICHARDSON V. … , Plaintiffs v.

Still v. Lance

279 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 1971

Tuttle v. Lumber Co., 263 N.C. 216 , 139 S.E. 2d 249 ; Wilkinson v. Mills, 250 N.C. 370 , 108 S.E. 2d 673 ; Long v. Gilliam, 244 N.C. 548 , 94 S.E. 2d 585 ; Howell v. … In Hodgin v.

State v. . Presley

35 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1852

His Honor, in charging the jury in this case, entiiely overlooked that of the State v. Thomas, 7 Ire. 381. That was an action upon a Sheriff’s bond, and the plaintiff made out a prima facie case. … The only difference is, that, in this the jury are informed, that the only thing that could save the witness Brown from the crime of perjury, if his statement was false, was that his mind was unsound.

Guano Company v. . Hicks

120 N.C. 29 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1897

Rosenthal v. Robertson, 114 N. C., 594 ; Delafield v. Construction Co., 115 N. C., 21 ; Worthy v. Brady, 91 N. C., 265 ; Turrentine v. Railroad, 92 N. C., 642 ; Chamblee v. Baker, 95. N C., 98; Walker v. Scott, 104. … Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622 ; Shober v. Wheeler, 119 N. C., 471 ; Owens v. Phelps, 91 N. C., 253 ; Pittman v. Kimberly, 92 N. C., 562 ; Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 127 ; Stephens v. Koonce, 106 N. C., 255 ; Porter v.

Essick v. City of Lexington

233 N.C. 600 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1951

Brown v. R. R., 202 N.C. 256 , 162 S.E. 613 ; Brown v. R. R., 204 N.C. 668 , 189 S.E. 419 ; Whitehead & Anderson, Inc., v. Branch, 220 N.C. 507 , 17 S.E. 2d 637 ; Eledge v. Light Co., 230 N.C. 584, 55 , S.E. 2d 179. … In this case on the former appeal ( 232 N.C. 200 ) Justice Seawell restated the rule as follows: “Under Brown v. R.

Hayes v. . Benton

193 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1927

J., 541; Johnston v. Board of Elections , 172 N.C. 162 ; Britt v. Board of Canvassers, ibid. , 797; Person v. Watts , 184 N.C. 499 , 505 ; Person v. Doughton , 186 N.C. 723 ; Umstead v. … Jeffress v. Greenville , 154 N.C. 499 ; Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners , 150 N.C. 116 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro , 149 N.C. 128 ; Ward v. Comrs. , 146 N.C. 534 ; Small v. Edenton , 146 N.C. 527 ; Tate v.

Lockhart v. . Lockhart

223 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1943

Adams v. Cleve, 218 N. C., 302 , 10 S. E. (2d), 911 ; Pridgen v. Pridgen, 190 N. C., 102 , 129 S. E., 419 . … Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 196 S. E., 333 , and Byers v. Byers, ante, 85. The pleadings raise issues of fact to be tried by jury. The judgment rendered on the pleadings must be Reversed.