Case law

Norfolk Southern Railroad v. McArtan

185 N.C. 201 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1923

Comrs. of Dodge County v. Chandler, 96 U. S., 205 ; Washer v. Bullitt County, 110 U. … Calhoun County v. Galbraith, 99 U. S., 214 ; Knox County v. Christianer, 68 Ill., 453 ; Alleghany County v. Gibson, 90 Pa., 397 ; Douglass v. Harrisville, 9 W. Va., 162 ; Rogers v. Windoes, 48 Mich., 628 State v.

State v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

363 N.C. 623 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2009

Jones, 222 N.C. at 413-14 , 23 S.E.2d at 305 ; Simmons v. … Stale v. Philip Morris USA Inc., - N.C. App. at -, 669 S.E.2d at 757 (citing Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v.

In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of Durham

243 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1956

This Court, in Brown v. … Commissioners, 173 N.C. 598 , 92 S.E. 502 , held that, “An Act to authorize the board of commissioners of Me- *500 Dowell Comity to issue bonds for road purposes in North Cove Township in said county,” was a valid law and

Reed v. Elmore

246 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 1957

Walsh, 217 N.C. 32, 38 , 6 S.E. 2d 817 ; Brown v. Brown, 168 N.C. 4, 10 , 84 S.E. 25 ; Krites v. Plott, 222 N.C. 679, 681 , 24 S.E. 2d 531 .” Seawell, J., in McKay v. Cameron, 231 N.C. 658 , 58 S.E. 2d 638 . … Denny, 156 N.Y.S. 1016 , and Feinberg v. Board of Education, 276 S.W. 823 (Ky.); Hutchinson v. Ulrich, 21 L.R. A. 391 (Ill.). The easements imposed are coterminous with the estate granted and retained. Ruffin v. R.

Wise v. Harrington Grove Community Ass'n

357 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 22, 2003

On 7 July 1999, defendant’s board met to consider the fine and heard presentations from plaintiffs and the ACC. … Brown, 234 N.C. 517, 522 , 67 S.E.2d 489, 492 (1951). As a general rule, “[Restrictive covenants are valid so long as they do not impair the enjoyment of the estate and are not contrary to the public interest.”

Jackson v. . Creamery

202 N.C. 196 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1932

In the case of Brown v. … From Parrish v.

Reynolds v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore

201 N.C. 267 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1931

Williams v. Bailey, 178 N. C., 632 .” Kidder v. Bailey, 187 N. C., at p. 508-9; Watkins v. Flora, 30 N. C., 374 ; Stowe v. Davis, 32 N. C., 431 ; Hester v. Hester, 37 N. C., 330 ; Deaf Institute v. Norwood, 45 N. … C., at p. 214; Cecil v. Cecil, 173 N. C., 410 , and Brown v. Brown, 195 N. C., 315 , are not inconsistent to the position here taken.

State Ex Rel. Salisbury v. Croom

167 N.C. 223 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 11, 1914

Nichols v. McKee, 68 N. C., 429 ; Welker v. Bledsoe, 68 N. C., 457 ; Clark v. Stanly, 66 N. C., 59 . … Laine v. Tyrrell, 87 Cal., 475 ; People ex rel. Cagman, 20 Cal., 504 ; State ex rel. Meyer, 27 La. Anno., *228 569; S. v. Raveshede, 32 La. Anno., 934; In re Marshalship So. Ala., 20 Fed., 379 ; State ex rel. Robert v.

Briggs v. . Briggs

215 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1939

Medlin v. Medlin, 175 N. C., 529 , 95 S. E., 857 ; Holloway v. Holloway, 214 N. C., 662 . The plaintiff by his suit seeks to deprive the defendant of her legal right to support from him. … Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , and cases there cited.

Silver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners

821 S.E.2d 755 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2018

Cooper v. … In Moore v. Board of Education, 212 N.C. 499, 193 S.E. 732 (1937), this Court noted that local school boards are agencies of the State, with the General Assembly having close to plenary power over them.

State v. . Turner

106 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Brown” was charged in the indictment to be the lessor, or landlord. … State v. Norman, 2 Dev., 222 ; State v. Tomlinson, 77 N. C., 528 ; State v. Heaton, 81 N. C., 542 ; Arch. Cr. Pl., 48; 1 Bish. Cr. Pros., § 375, et seq.

Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.

235 N.C. 705 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952

Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 ; Roth v. McCord, 232 N.C. 678 , 62 S.E. 2d 64 ; Greyvan Lines v. Harrison, 156 F. 2d 412 , affd. 331 U.S. 704 , 91 L. Ed. 1757 . … Brown v. Truck Lines, supra; Roth v. McCord, supra.

Range Co. v. . Campen

135 N.C. 506 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1904

This doctrine was announced in Brown v. … If, therefore, as said in Brown v.

Leonard v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

309 N.C. 91 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 1983

Brown v. R. R., 204 N.C. 668 , 169 S.E. 419 (1933) (“Brown II”). In the absence of any Virginia law one way or the other on this issue, the rule of lex loci delicti commissi does not apply. … Brown v. R. R., 202 N.C. 256, 263-64 , 162 S.E. 613, 617-18 (1932) (“Brown I”). Therefore, Chero-Cola could not be made a party defendant in the action.

Palmer v. . Lowder

167 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1914

C., 194 ; Stern v. Benbow, 151 N. C., 462 ; Audit Co. v. Taylor, 152 N. C., 274 ; Kernodle v. Williams, 153 N. C., 476 ; Rogers v. Lumber Co., 154 N. C., 112 ; Lumber Co. v. Brown, 160 N. C., 283 . … Lamb v. Baxter, 130 N. C., 67 ; Abbott v. Hunt, 129 N. C., 403 ; Smith v. Brown, 132 N. C., 365 .

S. Env't Law Ctr. v. N.C. Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 13, 2021

Although the Governor does appoint a majority of the members of the board, the board does not have to obtain approval from the Governor or any other state official  SELC V. … In re B.O.A., 372 N.C. 372, 380 (2019) (quoting Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 522 (1998)).

Pasour v. . Lineberger

90 N.C. 159 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 ; Halcombe v. Commissioners, 89 N. C., 346 . 3. … Burke v. Turner, 85 N. C., 500 ; Roulhac v. Brown, supra; Sanderson v. Daily, 83 N. C., 67 ; Mabry v. Henry, Ib., 298; Wilson v. Dineberger, 82 N. C., 412 . 5.

MEHERRIN INDIAN TRIBE v. Lewis

363 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2010

690 S.E.2d 705 (2010) MEHERRIN INDIAN TRIBE, Dorothy Lee, Jonathan Caudill, Margo Howard, Abby Reid, Theresa Langston, Wayne Melton, Wayne Brown, and Kelly Brown, Plaintiffs, v.

Pate v. . R. R.

122 N.C. 877 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1898

The point was considered in Rhyne v. Lipscombe, ante , 650; S. v. Ray, post , 1097, and Tate v. Commissioners., ante , 661. … Wilson , 121 N.C. 425 , it is an administrative court (somewhat like the board of commissioners).

Byers v. Byers

223 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1943

Reynolds v. Reynolds, 208 N. C., 428 , 181 S. E., 338 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 196 S. E., 333 ; Hyder v. Hyder, 215 N. C., 239 , 1 S. E. (2d), 540 . … Medlin v. Medlin, 175 N. C., 529 , 95 S. E., 857 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N. C., 64 , 169 S. E., 818 ; Price v. Edwards, 178 N. C., 493 , 101 S. E., 33 ; 30 Am. Jur., 925 .