Case law

State v. Walker

359 N.C. 642 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2005

614 S.E.2d 921 (2005) 359 N.C. 642 STATE of North Carolina v. Jason Christopher WALKER and Emil E. Browning, Jr. and Javier A. Hernandez Jr. No. 16P05. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 4, 2005. … Browning, Jr. Kristine L. Lanning, Assistant Attorney General, Mitchell D.

Commissioners v. . Assell

194 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 1927

In Herring v. … Tate v. Comrs. , 122 N.C. 812 ; Smathers v. Comrs. , 125 N.C. at p. 488; Henderson v. Wilmington , 191 N.C. 269 . In R. R. v.

State v. . Dean

35 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1851

This very point is decided, S. v. George , 29 N.C. 321 , and the decision is so well sustained by authority and upon principle as not to call for another word. PER CURIAM. Error. Cited: S. v. … Jackson , 82 N.C. 568 ; S. v. Turner , 119 N.C. 848 . *Page 62 (72)

Bailey v. McPherson

233 N.C. 231 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1951

In Propst v. … In Fountain v. Pitt County, supra, the summons was against "The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitt." Service was made on the individual commissioners.

State v. Tarantino

322 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1988

Boarded windows and nailed doors prohibited observation of the inside from all but the most rigorous scrutiny. … State v. Frizzelle, 243 N.C. 49, 51 , 89 S.E.2d 725, 726 (1955) (applying State common law); State v. Browning, 28 N.C.App. 376, 379 , 221 S.E. 2d 375, 377 (1976) (same).

Braswell v. . Morrow

195 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

S. v. Trust Co., 192 N. C., 246 ; Besseliew v. Brown, 177 N. C., 65 . … Brown v. Louisburg 126 N. C., 701 ; Burns v. Womble, 131 N. C., 173 ; Smith v. R. R., 151 N. C., 479 ; Gregg v. Wilmington, 155 N. C., 23 ; Sircey v. Rees’ Sons, 155 N. C., 296 .

Cooper v. Berger

370 N.C. 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2018

McCrory v. … Wallace v.

State v. LaPlanche

349 N.C. 279 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1998

However, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), State v. Noble, 326 N.C. 581 , 391 S.E.2d 168 (1990), and State v. … State v. Hennis, 323 N.C. 279, 285 , 372 S.E.2d 523, 527 (1988).

N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. State

371 N.C. 170 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 2018

V. … V.

State v. Waddell

279 N.C. 442 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1971

State v. … Brown was in attendance, said money being the property of Jesse L. Brown, t/d/b/a (trading and doing business as) 7 Day Mart.” The defendant cites as his authority for the motion the case of State v.

In re Assessment Against Property of Southern Railway Co.

196 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929

The fact that the resolution of the board was to the effect that the street be 45 feet from the railroad center and the street is almost wholly within the right of way, and the part assessed is entirely within the right of … Boddie v. Bond, 154 N. C., 359 , 70 S. E., 824 ; 10 R. C. L., 688, et seq. Its compulsion is one of fair play.” Charlotte v. Alexander, 173 N. C., at p. 519-20. Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N.

Wilson v. Wilson

261 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1964

The contention that the order denying -alimony is supported by Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N.C. 742 , 138 S.E. 12 , s. c. 194 N.C. 673 , 140 S.E. 440 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Turner v. … Manifestly the Court 'did not intend to overrule it without referring thereto., but instead relied on Brown v. Brown, supra, and Lentz v. Lentz, supra. Davis v.

DeVine v. Dave Steel Co.

227 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1947

Rewis v. Ins. Co., 226 N. C., 325 , 38 S. E. (2d), 97 ; Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766 , 32 S. E. (2d), 320 . … Kearns v. Furniture Co., 222 N. C., 438 , 23 S. E. (2d), 310 . *686 Tbe cases of Rewis and Brown , above cited, are in full support of tbe conclusion bere reached.

State v. Fearing

304 N.C. 499 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

See State v. Charles Fearing, 304 N.C. 471 , 284 S.E. 2d 487 (1981); State v. Duvall, 304 N.C. 557 , 284 S.E. 2d 495 (1981). The instant case, State v. … Judge Brown granted the State’s motion on 4 December (despite Judge Browning’s prior ruling to the contrary on an identical motion).

Redmond v. . Chandley

119 N.C. 575 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1896

Bank v. Gilmer, 116 N. C., 684 ; Stoneburner v. Jeffreys, Ibid., 86 ; Brown v. Mitchell, supra; Woodruff v. Bowles, 104 N. C., 197 . … Brown v. Mitchell and Woodruff v. Bowles, supra ; Stephenson v. Felton, 106 N. C., 114 ; Peeler v. Peeler, 109 N. C., 628 ; Bank v. Gilmer, supra.

Roulhac v. . Miller

90 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1884

Roulhac, Executrix, v. Wm. Gael Browne. Whereas, the above-named Wm. … Parker v. Smith, 64 N. C., 291 . The subject and the practice as affected by legislation are so fully considered in the recent cases of Rogers v. Moore, 86 N. C., 85 , and Wynne v.

Moody v. . Wike

181 N.C. 509 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1921

Brown, of date 26 January, 1887, with continuous adverse possession under said deed, and the case on appeal states the position pertinent to plaintiffs’ claim as follows: “The plaintiff sued out claim and delivery proceedings … Stancill v. James, 126 N. C., 190 ; Hodge v. Powell, 96 N. C., 64 ; Fitch v. Walsh, 94 Neb., 32 . 64; Fitch v. Walsh, 94 Neb., 32 . There must be a New trial.

State v. . Sterling

200 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1930

Miss Georgia Brown, sister of tbe deceased, John Brown, and tbe only witness for tbe State, as shown by all tbe evidence, "who was present at tbe time tbe deceased was shot and killed, testified that tbe man who shot and … See, also, S. v. Gray, 180 N. C., 697 , 104 S. E., 647 ; S. v. Bryant, 178 N. C., 702 , 111 S. E., 430 ; S. v. Harden, 177 N. C., 580 , 98 S. E., 782 ; S. v. Spencer, 176 N. C., 709 , 97 S. E., 155 ; S. v. Leak, 156 N.

Brazier v. . Ansley

33 N.C. 12 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1850

Gordon v. Harper, 7th Term 9. Harwood v. Smith, 2nd Term 750. Lewis v. Moody, 4 Dev. and Bat. 323. … State v. Jones, 2 Dev. aud Bat. 544. Hare v. Pearson 4 Ired. 77 . The defendant was the owner of the land, on whoh the corn was raised,' and a man by the name of Brown cropped with him.

Bruce & Cook v. Crabtree

116 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

.: This is a proceeding supplemental to execution, commenced before the Clerk of Lenoir County, an appeal from his order to Brown, Judge, and an appeal by J. L. … Clement v. Foster, 39 N. C., 255 . Appeal Dismissed.