Case law

Hobgood v. Ehlen.

141 N.C. 344 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 16, 1906

Brown, J. … Trust Co. v. Turner, 111 Iowa, 664 . In Douglas v. Ireland, 73 N.

State v. Tidwell

323 N.C. 668 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1989

Brown to ask defendant what she, Mrs. Tidwell, had done to him. Ms. Brown did so. Defendant stated that Mrs. Tidwell had hit his car. Ms. Brown relayed this statement. Mrs. … . *675 In State v.

Poindexter v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.

235 N.C. 286 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1952

The defendant, however, cites and relies on Brown v. R. R., 204 N.C. 668 , 169 S.E. 419 ; Eledge v. Light Co., 230 N.C. 584 , 55 S.E. 2d 179 , and Essick v. … Brown v. Hodges, supra. The cases cited by defendant, when so considered, are clearly distinguishable.

Bynum v. Wilson County

367 N.C. 355 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 2014

Brown, Town Attorney for the Towns of Cramerton and Cornelius, amici curiae.  BYNUM V. WILSON CNTY. Opinion of the Court Roger A. … Horton v. Hous.

Downing v. . White

211 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1936

E., 364 ; Card v. Finch, 142 N. C., 140 , 54 S. E., 1009 ; Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 700 , 24 S. E., 527, 715 ; Armstrong v. Harshaw, 12 N. C., 187 . … Smathers v. Sprouse, 144 N. C., 637 , 57 S. E., 392 ; Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 .

Harleysville Ins. v. Buzz Off Insect

676 S.E.2d 476 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 21, 2009

676 S.E.2d 476 (2009) HARLEYSVILLE INS. v. BUZZ OFF INSECT. No. 272A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 21, 2009. David L. Brown, John I. Malone, Jr., Martha P. … Brown, Greensboro, Greensboro, for Harleysville Mutual Ins. Co. *477 Mack Sperling, John S. Buford, Greensboro, Cecilia 0. Miller, Diana S. Casey, San Diego, CA, J.

Miyares v. Forsyth County Department of Public Health

359 N.C. 634 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2005

State v. Sneeden

336 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1994

Brown, the father of Brian Brown, that she had been raped. She proceeded to tell Samuel Brown in exacting detail the events leading up to, during, and following the rape. … See, e.g., State v.

Gaither v. . Clement

183 N.C. 451 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1922

The defendant was engaged in erecting a brick and concrete building, and had laid the concrete floors in the building, same having been poured in forms made of wood and supported by 2-inch boards held up by timbers 4 x 4. … Marks v. Cotton Mills , 135 N.C. 290 ; Nail v. Brown , 150 N.C. 535 ; Mercer v. R. R. , 154 N.C. 401 .

Freeman v. . Belfer

173 N.C. 581 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 1917

J., and BROWN, J., dissenting. This is an action to recover land, tried on the following agreed statement of facts: 1. … Dec., 360 : "A divorce from bed and board does not put an end to the marriage ties, or destroy the relation of husband and wife; Capel v. Powell , 17 C. B., N.S., 743; Moore v. Barber , 5 Giff., 43; Barber v.

Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority v. Johnson

226 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1946

Tbe board of commissioners of Guilford County was empowered, to select three members of said board, one from High Point, one from Greensboro, and one from tbe county at large. … Brown v. Comrs., 223 N. C., 744 , 20 S. E. (2d), 104 ; Madry v. Scotland Neck, 214 N. C., 461 , 199 S. E., 618 ; Williamson v. High Point, supra; 38 Am. Jur., 85 , sec. 395, and 91, sec. 399.

Hutton v. Webb

124 N.C. 749 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1899

Norfleet v. Cromwell, 70 N. C., 634 ; Brown v. Keener, 74 N. C.,712, at pp. 716, 717; The Code Sections 3707, 3710, 3711; State v. Moore, 104 N. C., at pp 720, 721 and 722; Sands v. Manistee, 123 U. … Act in question it has always been held that the Courts will not inquire into the motives of legislators of any kind of grade, whether it be the Congress of the United States, the Legislature of the State, or a municipal board

In Re Jenkins v. .

157 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 13, 1911

Brown v. Eaton , 91 N.C. 26 . We will now proceed to consider the other question, whether the paper was found in a proper place of deposit. … Hughes v. Smith, supra . This Court said in Winstead v.

Vick v. . Tripp

153 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1910

This is discussed in Lumber Co. v. Hudson, at this term. In Johnston v. Case, 132 N. … C., 252 ; Reed v. Reed, 93 N. C., 462 ; Davidson v. Arledge, 88 N. C., 326 ; Hemphill v. Annis, 119 N.

State v. Ginyard

334 N.C. 155 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1993

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984). … In State v.

Tetterton v. Long Manufacturing Co.

314 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 3, 1985

Glenn v. Board of Education of Mitchell County, 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 (1936). … Brown v. General Electric Co., 584 F. Supp. 1305 (E.D.N.C. 1983).

Snyder v. Freeman

300 N.C. 204 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980

Section 3(b) of the agreement provides that upon its consummation plaintiff “shall resign from the Board of Directors of General Aviation and [defendants Freeman and Groom] shall elect to the board to fill her vacancy Mr. … Walker v. Brown, 28 Ill. 378 , 81 Am. Dec. 287 ; Massachusetts General Hospital v. Fairbanks, 129 Mass. 78 , 37 Am. Rep. 303 ; Sullivan v. Detroit, Y. & A.A. R. Co., 135 Mich. 661 , 98 N.W. 756 , 64 L.R.A. 673 , 106 Am.

Halford v. . Senter

169 N.C. 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1915

Tbe agreed facts are tbat plaintiff was duly elected superintendent of bealtb for Harnett County by tbe board of bealtb of said county and his compensation fixed by said board at tbe rate of $600 per annum. … Tbe very question presented here was decided by this Court adversely to plaintiff’s contention in McCullers v. Commissioners, 158 N.

State v. . Bentley

223 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1943

S. v. Robertson , *Page 567 210 N.C. 266 , 186 S.E. 247 ; S. v. Smith , 201 N.C. 494 , 160 S.E. 577 ; S. v. Cox , 201 N.C. 357 , 160 S.E. 358 ; S. v. Spain , 201 N.C. 571 , 573 , 160 S.E. 834 ; S. v. … In S. v.

Doe Ex Dem. Brown's Heirs v. Potter's Heirs

44 N.C. 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1853

This doctrine is fully recognized and established by the case of Carson v. Mills & Burnet, L Dev. & Bat., 546. … In Smith v. Bryan, ante 180, the same doctrine is declared.