Case law

Mauney v. . Commissioners

71 N.C. 486 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Cited: Trull v. Comrs. , 72 N.C. 391 ; Comrs. v. Comrs. , 79 N.C. 569 ; Cromartie v. Comrs. , 87 N.C. 139 ; Barksdale v. Comrs. , 93 N.C. 476 ; Bd. of Ed. v. Comrs. , 107 N.C. 112 ; Herring v. … Dixon , 122 N.C. 423 ; Betts v. Raleigh , 142 N.C. 230 ; R. R. v. Comrs. , 148 N.C. 234 ; R. R. v. Cherokee Co. , 177 N.C. 90 ; R. R. v. Comrs. , 178 N.C. 452 ; Person v. Watts , 184 N.C. 538 . *Page 388

State v. Hatcher

277 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1970

In Simmons v. … The victim Brown had talked to defendant for more than an hour on the night of the crime and had ample opportunity to observe him. Brown had heard the waitress refer to defendant as “Bobby Hatcher.”

State v. Little

270 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1967

S. v. Hamilton, 264 N.C. 277 , 141 S.E. 2d 506 ; S. v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293 , 121 S.E. 2d 736 ; S. v. McPeak, 243 N.C. *239 243, 90 S.E. 2d 501 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 919 , 100 L. Ed. 1451 ; S. v. … Moore, 240 N.C. 749 , 83 S.E. 2d 912 ; Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624 , 90 L. Ed. 1477 ; United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65 , 88 L. Ed. 1140 ; United States v. Page, 302 F. 2d 81 ; Nelson v.

Winkler v. N.C. State Bd. of Plumbing

830 S.E.2d 819 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 14, 2019

Winkler v. N.C. State Bd. of Plumbing

830 S.E.2d 821 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 14, 2019

Riggan v. . Green

80 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

Rev. ch. 35, § 1 ; Hogan v. Strayhorn, 65 N. C., 279 ; Hare v. Jernigan, 76 N C., 471; and therefore we conclude that the deed of Joseph H. Riggan availed to-pass an estate to James T. … Carr v. Holliday, 1 Dev. & Bat. Eq., 344 , and same case, 5 Ire. Eq., 167.

Bradford v. Bank of Warsaw

182 N.C. 225 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 1921

Brown and Daisy Brown were the only children of A. J. Brown, who died in 1913. … Brown, and said J. G.

City of Raleigh v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

180 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 27, 1920

BrowN, J. … In People v. Deehan, 153 N.

Jones v. . Jones

46 N.C. 491 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1854

Reeves, who stated that he was at Brown's house at the time spoken of by Clark; Plaintiff told Brown he had a ca. sa . against him and Clark. … JONES v. JONES, 13 Ired. Rep. 448 . The residue of the charge followed necessarily from the previous part of it, and the defendant's counsel has very properly declined to contend that it is erroneous.

Nantz v. Employment Security Commission

290 N.C. 473 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 14, 1976

Consequently, as the Court said in Bishop v. Wood, supra, “Petitioner’s discharge did not deprive [her] of a property interest protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.” In Board of Regents v. … . * * * *483 “In Board of Regents v.

Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem

280 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

Holmes v. Fayetteville, 197 N.C. 740 , 150 S.E. 624 ; S. v. Eason, 114 N.C. 787 ; Dean Milk Co. v. Aurora, 14 A.L.R. 2d 98 ; Hyre v. Brown, 49 A.L.R. 1230 and annotations; Donable v. Harrisonburg, 104 Va. 533 , 7 Ann. … Gorman v. Adams, 259 Iowa 75 , 143 N.W. 2d 648 (1966); Murphy v. City of Carlsbad, 66 N.M. 376 , 348 P. 2d 492 ; Brown v. City of Sioux City, 242 Iowa 1196 , 49 N.W. 2d 853 ; New Mexico Products Co. v.

Parrish v. . R. R.

221 N.C. 292 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1942

, large cinders or burnt coal, clinkers and dirt, and the railroad bed, beyond the end of the said boards . . . constructed and maintained of large cinders or burnt coal clinkers and coarse gravel and dirt and projecting … Raper v. R. R. , 126 N.C. 563 , 36 S.E. 115 ; Pusey v. R. R. , 181 N.C. 137 , 106 S.E. 452 ; Moore v. R. R. , 201 N.C. 26 , 158 S.E. 556 ; Cashatt v. Brown , 211 N.C. 367 , 371 , 190 S.E. 480 .

J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. McClamrock

152 N.C. 405 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1910

Woodridge v. Brown, 149 N. C., 299 . … Woodridge v. Brown, supra. In addition, tbe contract contained tbis express stipulation: “Acceptance by purchaser is a full waiver of all claims arising from any cause.”

Lawhon v. . McArthur

213 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 23, 1938

Brown, negotiated the sale of the oak timber to J. D. … S., 846; Lewis v. Lumber Co. , 99 N.C. 11 , 5 S.E. 19 ; Lumber Co. v. Wallace , 93 N.C. 22 ; R. R. v. Transit Co. , 195 N.C. 305 , 141 S.E. 882 . At any rate there was error in dismissing the action. Grantham v.

Douglass v. . Dawson

190 N.C. 458 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1925

S., 1210; Besselliew v. Brown , 177 N.C. 65 , 2 A.L.R., 862 ; Pender v. Speight , 159 N.C. 612 ; Black v. Power Co. , 158 N.C. 468 ; Chemical Co. v. Floyd , 158 N.C. 456 ; Smathers v. Bank , 135 N.C. 410 ; Coble v. … In Coble v.

Lenoir County v. . Taylor

190 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 28, 1925

Tyrrell v. Holloway, 182 N. C., 64 ; Durham v. R. R., 185 N. C., 240 . … People v. Green, 75 N. C., 329 ; Colvard v. Comrs., 95 N. C., 515 ; Somers v. Comrs., 123 N.

Hoke Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2026

In Hoke County Board of Education v. … Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education [and subsequently] forbidden by the 1971 Constitution.’ ” Leandro IV, 382 N.C. at 435 n.13 (alteration in original) (citing John V.

Eways v. Governor's Island

326 N.C. 552 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1990

Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427 , 378 S.E.2d 778 (1989); Sanitary District v. Lenoir, 249 N.C. 96 , 105 S.E.2d 411 (1958); Hayes v. Wilmington, 243 N.C. 525 , 91 S.E.2d 673 (1956). … Clark v. Craven Regional Medical Authority, 326 N.C. 15 , 387 S.E.2d 168 (1990); Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427 , 378 S.E.2d 778 .

Simmons v. Lee

230 N.C. 216 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1949

J., in the case, of Cotton Mills v. Maslin, 200 N.C. 328 , 156 S.E. 484 . See also Booker v. Highlands, 198 N.C. 282 , 151 S.E. 635 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 ; Cheshire v. … Woody v. Fountain, 143 N.C. 66 , 55 S.E. 425 . See also Smith v. Johnson, 137 N.C. 43 , 49 S.E. 62 ; Davis v. Wall, 142 N.C. 450 , 55 S.E. 350 ; Brown v. Hutchinson, 155 N.C. 205 , 71 S.E. 302 ; Hill v.

Griffin v. Springer

244 N.C. 95 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 1956

Davis v. Brown, 241 N.C. 116 , 84 S.E. 2d 334 ; Bryant v. Shields, 220 N.C. 628 , 18 S.E. 2d 157 ; Seawell v. Hall, 185 N.C. 80 , 116 S.E. 189 ; Brown v. Brown, 168 N.C. 4 , 84 S.E. 25 ; Gudger v. … Brown v. Brown, supra. In Mewborn v. Mewborn, supra, the testator in the part of his will relevant to the question before us used words strikingly similar to the language of the deed here.