Case law

Bartlett v. Hopkins

235 N.C. 165 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1952

Cherry v. Andrews, 229 N.C. 333 , 49 S.E. 2d 641 ; Chesson v. Container Co., 223 N.C. 378 , 26 S.E. 2d 904 ; Brown v. Broadhurst, 197 S.E. 738 , 150 S.E. 355 ; Brown v. … G.S. 1-195; Brown v. Clement Co., supra; Booker v. Highlands, supra; Wilson v. Featherstone, 120 N.C. 446 , 27 S.E. 124 . 3.

State v. . Hill

126 N.C. 1140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1900

Even then he had no assurance of obtaining it, no matter how low he bid, as the board of health retained the right to refuse any and all bids, and to "decide who are competent (1144) bidders." … Attorney-General and Brown Shepherd for State; Osborne, Maxwell Keerans for defendant. GARREN v. SCOTT, from Henderson. Affirmed . W. A. Smith and A. E. Posey for plaintiff; no counsel for defendant. BAXTER v.

Den on the Several Demises of Robinson v. Barfield

6 N.C. 391 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1818

the said Sarah Brown, and so as to bar them and (419) every of them forever." … University v. Foy , 3 N.C. 310 , 374 ; Allen v. Peden , 4 N.C. 442 . Divers cases have been decided the same way in the Supreme Court of the United States, which, we think, ought to put the question at rest. *Page 291

State Ex Rel. Thornburg v. House and Lot

334 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 30, 1993

Rogister, Jr. and Allison Brown Schafer, Raleigh, for the North Carolina School Boards Ass'n, amicus curiae. Randle L. Jones, High Point, for The North Carolina Ass'n of Police Attys.; Charles P. … In Mussallam v.

Baber v. . Hanie

163 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1913

Voorhees v. Porter , 134 N.C. 591 ; Knight v. Houghtalling , 85 N.C. 17 ; Council v. Bailey , 154 N.C. 54 ; Silk Co. v. … In our case, Miss Brown could hold Mrs.

N.C. Dep't of Revenue v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 22, 2025

(emphasis added)). 5 The General Assembly abolished the Tax Review Board in 2007. See N.C. Dep’t of Revenue v. Bill Davis Racing, 201 N.C. … Opinion of the Court in original) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159 (2000)).

Gwaltney v. Scottish Carolina Timber & Land Co.

111 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1892

Brown v. Chadbourne, supra; Field v. Log Co., 67 Wis., 569 ; Buchanan v. Grand River Co., 48 Mich., 364 ; Muse v. Smith, 3 Oregon, 621; Grand Rapids v. Jarvis, supra; Treat v. Lord, supra. … Town of Pierreport v. Loveless, 72 N. Y., 212 ; Walker v. Board of Public Works, 16 Ohio, 540.

State v. Sinclair

301 N.C. 193 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1980

Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 261 (1971). Accord, Gilbert v. United States, 466 F. 2d 533 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Delsanter, 433 F. 2d 972 (2nd Cir. 1970); Manley v. … In State v.

J. P. Leach & Co. v. Curtin

123 N.C. 85 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1898

Browning, a debt of $800, and the fourth to secure a debt due to the defendants, Browning & Son, in the sum of $338.29. … Killebrew v. Hines, 104 N. C., 182 .

Hudson v. McArthur

152 N.C. 445 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1910

The board of commissioners possesses gu¿cm-judicial, legislative and administrative powers. … Teall v. Felton, 1 N. Y., 537 ; same case, 12 How. U. S., 284; Lincoln v. Hapgood, 11 Mass.; Hayes v. Porter, 22 Maine, 371; Jeffreys v. Ankeny, 11 Ohio, 372; Brown v. Lester, 21 Miss., 392 .

State v. Speller

230 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1949

counsel for the prisoner were compelled to resort at random to the special veniremen and to bystanders in the courtroom at Windsor, eighty-two miles from the county seat of Warren County, to sustain the proposition that the Board … The declaration of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Brown v. Hummel, 6 Pa. State 86, 47 Am. Dec. 431 , is apposite.

Hunsucker v. . Winborne

223 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1943

And there is no allegation that the Board has acted capriciously or in bad faith. Pue v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 222 N. C., 310 , 22 S. E. (2d), 896 ; Warren v. Maxwell, ante, 604. … See Schank v. Asheville, 154 N. C., 40 , 69 S. E., 681 ; Asheboro v. Miller, 220 N. C., 298, 17 S. E. (2d), 105 ; Warren v. Maxwell, supra.

State v. White

271 N.C. 391 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967

Brown’s house for his pay for hauling Booker T. Brown and Wig Clark to work. Booker T. Brown was not at home. In leaving for the gunsmith’s, he turned down Sycamore Street and saw Booker T. … Hanrahan v. Walgreen Co., 243 N.C. 268 , 90 S.E. 2d 392 .

Efird v. . Comrs. of Forsyth

219 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1941

Provision Co. v. Daves , 190 N.C. 7 . It was held in Meador v. … Jones v. North Wilkesboro , 150 N.C. 646 ; Hayes v. Benton , 193 N.C. 379 , and cases there cited.

Hatley v. Johnston

265 N.C. 73 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1965

Betts v. Brown, 219 Ga. 782 , 136 S.E. 2d 365 (1964).” … Light Co. v. Moss, 220 N.C. 200 , 17 S.E. 2d 10 . In Insurance Co. v.

State v. Roux

263 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

Pue v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 222 N.C. 310 , 22 S.E. 2d 896 ; Realty Co. v. Planning Board, 243 N.C. 648 , 92 S.E. 2d 82 . … Draper v. Washington (1963), 372 U.S. 487 , 9 L. Ed. 2d 899 ; Lane v. Brown (1963), 372 U.S. 477 , 9 L. Ed. 2d 892 ; Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, supra; Annot., 6 L. Ed. 2d 1295 .

State Ex Rel . Bd., Com. of Bladen Co. v. . Clarke

73 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875

United States v. Dashiell, 4 How. 182 ; United States v. Prescott, 3 How. 587 ; United States v. Keeler, 1 Wall. 83 . … Thompson v. Board of Trustees, &c., 30 Ill. 99 ; Hancock v. Bazzard, 12 Cush. (Mass.) 112. The case of a public officer differs in principle from that of a guardian who is held liable only for honesty and diligence.

Mauney v. . Commissioners

71 N.C. 486 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Cited: Trull v. Comrs. , 72 N.C. 391 ; Comrs. v. Comrs. , 79 N.C. 569 ; Cromartie v. Comrs. , 87 N.C. 139 ; Barksdale v. Comrs. , 93 N.C. 476 ; Bd. of Ed. v. Comrs. , 107 N.C. 112 ; Herring v. … Dixon , 122 N.C. 423 ; Betts v. Raleigh , 142 N.C. 230 ; R. R. v. Comrs. , 148 N.C. 234 ; R. R. v. Cherokee Co. , 177 N.C. 90 ; R. R. v. Comrs. , 178 N.C. 452 ; Person v. Watts , 184 N.C. 538 . *Page 388

State v. Hatcher

277 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1970

In Simmons v. … The victim Brown had talked to defendant for more than an hour on the night of the crime and had ample opportunity to observe him. Brown had heard the waitress refer to defendant as “Bobby Hatcher.”

State v. Little

270 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1967

S. v. Hamilton, 264 N.C. 277 , 141 S.E. 2d 506 ; S. v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293 , 121 S.E. 2d 736 ; S. v. McPeak, 243 N.C. *239 243, 90 S.E. 2d 501 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 919 , 100 L. Ed. 1451 ; S. v. … Moore, 240 N.C. 749 , 83 S.E. 2d 912 ; Zap v. United States, 328 U.S. 624 , 90 L. Ed. 1477 ; United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65 , 88 L. Ed. 1140 ; United States v. Page, 302 F. 2d 81 ; Nelson v.