Case law

Lynch v. Dewey Bros.

175 N.C. 152 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1918

And Justice Brown said, in Deaton v. Lumber Co., 165 N. … Neg., sec. 361; Sims v. Lindsay, 122 N. C., 678 ; Lloyd v. Hanes, 126 N. C., 359 ; Patterson v. Pittsburg, 76 Pa. St., 389; Kane v. R. R., 128 U. S., 95 . In Lloyd v.

Etheridge v. Peters

301 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1980

Trooper Brown completed reading the rights form to petitioner at 9:19 p.m. “7. … That court relying on Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 298 N.C. 453 , 259 S.E. 2d 544 (1979), reversed the judgment of the trial court.

State v. . Hall

224 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1944

Carter v. Virginia, supra; Johnson v. Yellow Cab , 88 Law. Ed., 553; Duckworth v. Arkansas , 314 U.S. 390 , 86 Law. Ed., 294. … R. v. Baird , 164 N.C. 253 , 80 S.E. 406 . "Possession and control are essential elements in the law of bailment," said Justice Brown in Matthews v. R. R. , 175 N.C. 35 , 94 S.E. 714 .

State v. . French

109 N.C. 722 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Brown v. Houston , 114 U.S. 622 . … In the late case of Maine v. R.

Phœnix Iron Co. v. Roanoke Bridge Co.

169 N.C. 512 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 1915

See, also Moore v. Industrial Co., 138 N. C., 304 ; Alexander v. Parrow, 151 N. C., 320 . In Fortier v. Delgado, 59 C. C. … In Moyer v.

Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home Stores

242 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1955

Daniel v. Gardner, 240 N.C. 249 , 81 S.E. 2d 660 ; Brown v. Hall, 226 N.C. 732 , 40 S.E. 2d 412 . Upon motion irrelevant allegations in a pleading should be stricken. … Swinton v. Savoy Realty Co., 236 N.C. 723 , 73 S.E. 2d 785 ; Harris v. Coach Co., 220 N.C. 67 , 16 S.E. 2d 464 ; Roth v. News Co., supra; Baker v. Winslow, 184 N.C. 1 , 113 S.E. 570 ; Hall v.

Mock v. . Coggin

101 N.C. 366 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

Covington v. Ingram, 64 N. C., 123 ; Thaxton v. Williamson, 72 N. C., 125 ; Peterson v. Vann, 83 N. C., 118 ; England v. Garner, 84 N. C., 212 ; Thompson v. Shamwell, 89 N. C., 283 . 2. … Hinsdale v. Hawley, 89 N. C., 87 ; Moore v. Hinnant, 90 N. C., 163 . 3.

Bland v. City of Wilmington

278 N.C. 657 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1971

Relying upon State v. … See also Nissen v. Winston-Salem, 206 N.C. 888 , 175 S.E. 310 ; Duncan v. Board of Fire & Police Com’rs, etc., 131 N. J. L. 443, 37 A. 2d 85 ; Johnson v. Pease, 126 Wash. 163 , 217 P. 1005 ; Driscoll v.

Burton v. . Furman

115 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

Selecting one of such cases, Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C., 98 , we find a very clear statement by Mr. … In Decatur v.

Tabron v. Gold Leaf Farms, Inc.

269 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1967

Reference is made to Stanley v. Brown, 261 N.C. 243 , 134 S.E. 2d 321 , for a full statement of the factual situation considered therein. … This Court held the 1962 order was void as to Brown and that the plaintiff’s action for personal injuries against Brown should have been nonsuited.

Cherry v. Wiesner

792 S.E.2d 779 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2016

Parlier v. . Miller

186 N.C. 501 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1923

Brown to pay W. W. Parlier the notes of $300 that Brown owed Par-lier under the facts in the case, if true, was a binding contract, founded on a valuable consideration and enforceable. J. F. Brown owed W. W. … See Woodcock v. Bostic, 118 N. C., 822 ; Way v. Transportation and Storage Co., ante, 224.

Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. Jenkins

271 N.C. 138 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 24, 1967

Adams v. Board of Education, 248 N.C. 506, 512 , 103 S.E. 2d 854, 858 ; accord, Wilson v. Bright, 255 N.C. 329 , 121 S.E. 2d 601 ; Hutchens v. Southard, 254 N.C. 428 , 119 S.E. 2d 205 . … Justice Brown, for the Court, stated the law with clearness and precision. . . .” Id. at 37, 67 S.E. at 31 . In Rimmer v. R.

Edwards v. City of Raleigh

150 N.C. 276 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 17, 1909

Brown, J. The evidence, taken in the most favorable light for the plaintiff, establishes these facts: On 23 November, 1907, about 7 P. … In the case of Smith v.

Barnes v. . Comrs.

184 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922

S., ch. 95, secs. 5469-5526, etc., also Laws 1921, ch. 179, that while county boards of education are given power to consolidate special tax districts, observing the provisions of the statutes in reference thereto, when they … S. v. Cooper, 101 N. C., 684 ; Riggsbee v. Durham, 98 N. C., 81 ; School District v. School District, 45 Kansas, 543; Voss v. School District, 18 Kansas, 467; Keweenaw Asso. v.

Cherry v. Wiesner

369 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2016

Coucoulas/Knight Properties, LLC v. Town of Hillsborough

364 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2010

. *128 [[Image here]] *129 [[Image here]] *130 [[Image here]] *131 [[Image here]] *132 Thompson v. N.C. Respiratory Care Bd. Case below: 202 N.C.

State v. Holmes

296 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1978

State v. Britt, supra; State v. Self, 280 N.C. 665 , 187 S.E. 2d 93 (1972). … Marshall Brown has admitted that Brown shot Drew Morrison and killed him and that Brown was testifying under an agreement with the State for a charge reduction in exchange for his testimony from first-degree murder to what

Bowen v. . Daugherty

168 N.C. 242 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1915

J., concurring; BROWN, J., did not sit or participate in the decision of this case. … Kitty Brown (one of the claimants) for life, and after her death to the children of Mrs. Kitty Brown, and appointed Mrs. Kitty Brown executrix, and that the said Mrs.

Town of Warrenton v. Warren County

215 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1939

It should be interpreted so as to carry out the general principles of the government, and not defeat them” — Brown, J., in Jenkins v. Board of Elections, 180 N. C., 169 , 85 S. E., 289 . … Board of Financial Control v. Henderson County, 208 N. C., 569 , 181 S. E., 636 ; Benson v. Johnston County, supra.