Case law

Taylor v. Cone Mills Corp.

306 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 1982

Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E. 2d 335 (1967). … Morse v. Curtis, 276 N.C. 371 , 172 S.E. 2d 495 (1970).

State v. Trexler

316 N.C. 528 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1986

The majority felt that it was bound by this Court’s decision in State v. Brown, 308 N.C. 181 , 301 S.E. 2d 89 (1983). … State v. Franklin, 308 N.C. 682 , 304 S.E. 2d 579 (1983); State v. Green, 295 N.C. 244 , 244 S.E. 2d 369 (1978); State v.

Lance v. Russell

157 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1911

Bushee v. Surles, 79 N. C., 53 ; Patrick v. R. R., 101 N. C., 604 ; Smith v. Hicks, 108 N. C., 251 ; Cummings v. Swepson, 124 N. C., 584 ; Brockett v. Gilliam, 125 N. C., 382 . … Brown was a party to the agreement and would be bound by it, when in fact no one had authority to represent him, which is, we think, “good cause shown.” *454 In Kerr v. Hicks, 131 N.

Martin v. . Raleigh.

208 N.C. 369 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1935

See Martin v. Board of Commissioners of Wake County, ante , 354. … See Wilson v. Charlotte , 74 N.C. 748 . In Henderson v.

STATE TRUST COMPANY v. Toms

244 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1956

Creed v. Marshall, 160 N.C. 394 , 76 S.E. 270 ; S. v. Cannon, supra; Galloway v. McKeithen, 27 N.C. 12 ; Mayo v. Whitson, 47 N.C. 231 ; Kirkland v. Mangum, 50 N.C. 313 ; Freshwater v. Baker, 52 N.C. 404 ; Pendleton v. … Moye v. Petway, 75 N.C. 165 ; Creed v. Marshall, supra; Springs v. Schenck, 106 N.C. 153 ; Davis v. Shaver, 61 N.C. 18 ; McLendon v. Jones, 42 Am. Dec. 640 .

Cherokee County v. McClelland

179 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

BROWN, J., dissenting. … In Rexford v.

State v. . Hall

224 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1944

Carter v. Virginia, supra; Johnson v. Yellow Cab , 88 Law. Ed., 553; Duckworth v. Arkansas , 314 U.S. 390 , 86 Law. Ed., 294. … R. v. Baird , 164 N.C. 253 , 80 S.E. 406 . "Possession and control are essential elements in the law of bailment," said Justice Brown in Matthews v. R. R. , 175 N.C. 35 , 94 S.E. 714 .

State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Wilson

121 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

See also decisions of our Supreme Court: Hoke v. Henderson , 15 N.C.; Cotton v. Ellis , 52 N.C.; Bunting v. Gales , 77 N.C.; Brown v. Turner , 70 N.C.; Howerton v. Tate , 70 N.C. … Brown, as he was entitled to do under the provisions of said act of the General Assembly. 14.

Jocie Motor Lines, Inc. v. Johnson

231 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1950

Griffin, 183 Va. 443 , 32 S.E. 2d 700 ; Brunner v. Cook, 134 Va. 266 , 114 S.E. 650 . Moreover, in the case of Brown v. … Brown v. Truck Lines, supra; Wood v. Miller, 226 N.C. 567 , 39 S.E. 2d 608 ; Hodges et als. v. Johnson et als., supra; Steffens v. Continental Freight Forwarders Co., 66 Ohio App. 534 ; Kimble v.

Lynch v. Dewey Bros.

175 N.C. 152 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1918

And Justice Brown said, in Deaton v. Lumber Co., 165 N. … Neg., sec. 361; Sims v. Lindsay, 122 N. C., 678 ; Lloyd v. Hanes, 126 N. C., 359 ; Patterson v. Pittsburg, 76 Pa. St., 389; Kane v. R. R., 128 U. S., 95 . In Lloyd v.

Etheridge v. Peters

301 N.C. 44 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1980

ETHERIDGE, Petitioner, v. Elbert L. PETERS, Jr., Commissioner, Division of Motor Vehicles, Respondent. No. 117. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 15, 1980. *134 Beaman, Kellum, Mills, Kafer & Stallings, P. … That Court, relying on Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 298 N.C. 453 , 259 S.E.2d 544 (1979), reversed the judgment of the trial court.

Burton v. . Furman

115 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894

Selecting one of such cases, Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C., 98 , we find a very clear statement by Mr. … In Decatur v.

Woodhouse v. Bd. of Com'rs of Town of Nags Head

299 N.C. 211 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1980

Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, supra at 468, 202 S.E. 2d at 136 . … Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, supra.

Alston v. . Savage

173 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1917

This was sufficient to admit parol testimony to identify the land, Fulcher v. Fulcher, 122 N. C., 101 . In Phillips v. Hooker, 62 N. … Batchelor v. Norris, 166 N. C., 506 . To same purport, Patton v. Sluder, 167 N. C., 500 ; Speed v. Perry, Ib., 122. The contract between John A. Savage and Brown further identified the land by adding: “J. A.

Lance v. . Russell

157 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1911

Bushee v. Surles , 79 N.C. 53 ; Patrick v. R. R. , 101 N.C. 604 ; Smith v. Hicks , 108 N.C. 251 ; Cummings v. Swepson , 124 N.C. 584 ; Brockett v. Gilliam , 125 N.C. 382 . … Cited: Cox v. Boyden , 167 N.C. 322 .

Perley v. . Paving Co.

228 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1948

Smith v. Paper Co. , 226 N.C. 47 , 36 S.E.2d 730 ; Greer v. Construction Co. , 190 N.C. 632 , 130 S.E. 739 ; Moore v. Sales Co. , 214 N.C. 424 , 199 S.E. 605 . In Hayes v. … The facts upon which the decisions were based in Gulf Refining Co. v. Brown , 93 F. (2), 870; Burruss v. Logging Co. , 31 P.2d 263 ; Burnett *Page 484 v. Ind. Com. , 63 N.E. (2), 240; and Ridgdell v.

King v. . Hunter

65 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1871

Warner v. The People, 2 Denio, 272 . … We need hardly refer to the familiar cases of Hoke v. Henderson and Cotton v. Ellis in our own Reports. It has been considered liow far an office or officer may be *613 taxed.

Etheridge v. Peters

301 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1980

Trooper Brown completed reading the rights form to petitioner at 9:19 p.m. “7. … That court relying on Seders v. Powell, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 298 N.C. 453 , 259 S.E. 2d 544 (1979), reversed the judgment of the trial court.

Debnam v. Chitty.

131 N.C. 657 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1902

Brown against the Board of County Commissioners of Hertford County." … The bonds now in question are dated 19 September, 1887; but it appears from the record that they were not actually issued until after the determination of the Brown suit in 1888.

State v. . French

109 N.C. 722 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

Brown v. Houston , 114 U.S. 622 . … In the late case of Maine v. R.