Case law

State v. Hinson

341 N.C. 66 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1995

State v. Ward, 338 N.C. 64, 98 , 449 S.E.2d 709, 728 (1994) (quoting State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 194 , 358 S.E.2d 1, 12-13 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 970 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 406 (1987)), cert. denied,-U.S. — ,- L. … State v.

State v. . Hall

114 N.C. 910 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

Rorer's Interstate Law, 308; Story's Conflict Laws, 620623; The Antelope, 10 Wheaton, 66-123 ; S. v. Knight , 1 N.C. (912) 143; S. v. Brown , 2 N.C. 100 ; S. v. Cutshall , 110 N.C. 538 . … I say the offense was committed on board of the schooner; for, although the gun was fired from the ship Rose , the shot took effect and the death happened on board of the schooner, and the act was, in contemplation of law

State v. . Jackson

150 N.C. 831 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1909

Citing Proctor v. Railroad, 154 Mass., 251 (1891) ; Corser v. Paul, 41 N. H., 24 (1860); Gibney v. Marchay, 34 N. Y., 301, 305 (1866) ; Loggins v. State, 8 Tex. App., 434, 444 (1880) ; Kaelin v. … C., 71 ; Guy v. Manuel, 89 N. C., 83 ; Francis v. Edwards, 77 N. C., 271 ; Pede v. Ryan, 110 Ala., 336 -341; State v. Mullins, 101 Mo., 514 .

State v. Sanders

327 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 29, 1990

See, e.g., Peters v. … See State v. McKoy, 327 N.C. 31 , 394 S.E.2d 426 ; State v. Brown, 327 N.C. 1 , 394 S.E.2d 434 (1990).

State v. . Medlin

126 N.C. 1127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1900

State v. Byrd, 121 N. C., 684 ; State v. Booker, 123 N. C., 713 . Aside from this, we do not think that the evidence justified tli© prayer. … The counsel cited us to State v. Hill, 20 N. C., 491 ; State v. Ingold, 49 N. C., 216 ; State v. Brittain, 89 N. C., 481, 500 ; State v. Hensley, 94 N. C., 1021, 1036 ; State v. Wilcox, 118 N. C., 1131 ; 1 Hale P.

Pittman Ex Rel. Pittman v. Swanson

255 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1961

Barnes v. Teer, 219 N.C. 823 , 15 S.E. 2d 379 ; Kolman v. Silbert, 219 N.C. 134 , 12 S.E. 2d 915 ; Spencer v. Brown, 214 N.C. 114 , 198 S.E. 630 ; Williams v. Coach Co., 197 N.C. 12 , 147 S.E. 435 ; Bowen v. … Aldridge v. Hasty, supra; Adams v. Board *686 of Education, 248 N.C. 506 , 103 S.E. 2d 854 . However, this seems prejudicial to the defendant rather than the plaintiff.

Walsh v. Wrightsville Beach Bd. of Alderman

644 S.E.2d 224 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 2007

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in State v. Hart, 361 N.C. ____ , 644 S.E.2d 201 , 2007 WL 1297237 (2007). REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Mullen v. Morrow

123 N.C. 773 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1898

; and that the board has no right or authority to appoint a member of one party for another party; that the Board had no authority to appoint two registrars from the same party in the same voting precinct. … This is left with the board within prescribed limits. The board now occupy much the same position the Clerk did under the Act of 1895, where the Chairman of a party did not file his lists in time. Harkins v.

State v. . Steele

106 N.C. 766 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

If we go further and admit, for the sake of argument, that the principle declared in Markham v. Brown, 8 N. … Brown.

Oliver v. . Highway Commission

194 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1927

In Mayo v. … Charlotte v. Alexander , 173 N.C. 515 ; Houser v. Bonsal , 149 N.C. 51 . In R. R. v.

State v. Hightower

331 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1992

We have held that N.C.G.S. § 15A-1212(8), which is a codification of the rule in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L. Ed. 2d 776 (1968), applies to the qualification of jurors in all cases. State v. … State v. Quick, 329 N.C. 1, 17 , 405 S.E.2d 179, 189 (1991); State v. Watson, 281 N.C. 221, 227 , 188 S.E.2d 289, 293 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1043 , 34 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1972).

McArver v. Gerukos

265 N.C. 413 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 13, 1965

State v. Brown, 221 N.C. 301 , 20 S.E. 2d 286 . Any violation of its provisions is declared to be a criminal offense. … In Courtney v.

Whiting Manufacturing Co. v. Carolina Aluminum Co.

207 N.C. 52 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1934

In Land Co. v. Traction Co., 162 N. … Also, see Brown v. Mobley, 192 N. C., 470 . The right of eminent domain to these public-service corporations makes them amenable to State control. The State can control a public-service corporation, and has done so.

State v. King

311 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 1984

State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 174 , 293 S.E. 2d 569, 584 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 (1982). … In State v.

McKethan v. . Commissioners of Cumberland

92 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1885

shall certify the same to the chairman of the board of justices of said county within five days of said meeting, and the chairman of said board of justice shall call a joint meeting of the justices and commissioners of said … the action of the commissioners in carrying into full effect *Page 249 the act of March 8, 1883, ch. 260, as well as the matter of law arising thereon, are essentially the same as those considered and disposed of in Evans v.

City of Durham v. Eno Cotton Mills

144 N.C. 705 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1907

State Board of Health v. Jersey City, 55 N. J. Eq., 116; 7 Words and Phrases, 6457, et seq. … Cook v. Moore, 100 N. C., 294 ; Summerlin v. Cowles, 107 N. C., 459 ; *715 Scroggs v. Stevenson, 108 N. C., 260 ; Barnhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 710 ; Solomon v. Bates, 118 N. C., 321 .

Edwards v. Goldsboro.

141 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1906

York v. Merritt, 77 N. C., 213 , Ibid, 80 N. C., 285 ; King v. Winants, 71 N. C., 469 ; Pinckston v. Brown, 56 N. C., 494 ; Sparks v. Sparks, 94 N. C., 532 . … Pinckston v. Brown, supra; 15 Am. & Eng. Enc. (2 Ed.), 1004. When the contract is executory, the court will not enforce it, and when executed, will not set it aside as against one party at the instance of the other.

Johnson v. City of Winston-Salem

282 N.C. 518 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 1973

In Carter v. … Anything short of a written claim signed by the plaintiff or his attorney and filed with the board of aldermen or the mayor within the ninety days, required a dismissal of the action. In Pender v.

Snow v. . Commissioners

112 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

The defendant board of commissioners were notified of the plaintiffs' claim and the agreement between J. C. … Cited: Satterthwaite v. Ellis , 129 N.C. 71 ; Gastonia v. Engineering Co. , 131 N.C. 362 ; Hardware Co. v. Graded School , 150 N.C. 681 ; Hall v. Jones , 151 N.C. 424 ; Hardware Co. v. Schools, ib. , 509; Hutchinson v.

Farms Co. v. . Comrs

178 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

Sanderlin v. Lukens , 152 N.C. 738 ; Newby v. Drainage Dist. , 163 N.C. 24 ; Shelton v. White , 163 N.C. 90 ; In re Big Cold Water D. D. , 162 N.C. 127 ; Banks v. Lane , 170 N.C. 14 ; Banks v. … Justice Hoke in Griffin v.