Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.47s
286 N.C. 488 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1975
Nor did it require the board to notify the teacher of the reason for the termination of his employment or to permit the teacher to appear before the board and be heard. Still v. … As we said in Childers v.
Cited 38 timesPublished177 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1919
Jeffress v. Greenville , 154 N.C. 499 ; Board of Education v. Board of Comrs. , 150 N.C. 116 ; Rosenthal v. Goldsboro , N.C. 149 N.C. 128 ; Ward v. Comrs. , 146 N.C. 534 ; Small v. Edenton , 146 N.C. 527 ; Tate v. … Cited: Person v. Watts , 184 N.C. 506 ; Lee v. Waynesville , 184 N.C. 568 ; Corporation Comm. v. R. R. , 185 N.C. 456 ; School Comm. v. Bd. of Ed. , 186 N.C. 648 ; Bd. of Ed. v. Comrs. , 189 N.C. 652 ; Harden v.
Cited 3 timesPublished153 N.C. 401 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1910
In 1904 the defendant County Board of Education bought 3 1-5 acres of said tract, and erected a $4,000 school thereon. … C., 524 ; Barrett v. Barrett, 120 N. C., 129 . The chairman of the county board, at the instance of said hoard and of the mother of said Alvatine, went to New Jersey, and induced her to come to North Carolina.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBurwell v. . Comrs. of Vance County
93 N.C. 73 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1885
Are the board of commissioners restrained by the act creating the county from putting it any where else than'upon the court house lot? 1. … In the forcible language of the late Chief Justice, in Hyatt v. Myers, 73 N. C., 232 , quoted upon a somewhat similar application in Dorsey v. Allen, 85 N.
Cited 4 timesPublished306 N.C. 594 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1982
Defendant’s motion was granted by Judge Brown and the State appealed. … Brown, 488 F. 2d 94, 95 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Hill, 447 F. 2d 817, 818-19 (7th Cir. 1971); United States ex rel Lombardino v. Heyd, 318 F. Supp. 648, 650-52 (E.D.
Cited 14 timesPublished95 N.C. 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886
Did the plaintiff offer bond with sufficient security to the Board of Commissioners of Graham County on the first Monday in December, 1884? III. … Cited: Somers v. Comrs. , 123 N.C. 584 ; Comrs. v. Gill , 126 N.C. 87 ; Taylor v. Vann , 127 N.C. 244 , 247 ; Lenoir County v. Taylor , 190 N.C. 341 .
Cited 0 timesPublished186 N.C. 690 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1923
Grant v. Board of Education , 178 N.C. 329 ; Webb v. Trustees , 143 N.C. 299 ; City of Rome v. Breed Co. , 21 Ga. App. 805 . … Board of Education the Court, in upholding this decision, and as pertinent to this inquiry, said: "On these, the pertinent facts of the controversy, the question chiefly presented was fully considered by us in Webb v.
Cited 0 timesPublished194 N.C. 583 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1927
Edwards v. White , 180 N.C. 55 , citing and approving Powell v. Watkins , 172 N.C. 244 . … Enloe v. Sherrill , 28 N.C. 213 .
Cited 24 timesPublished173 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1917
Sites v. Miller , 120 Ind. 19 , citing numerous authorities; Kinney v. Ball , 68 Mich. 625 ; Curram v. Sidney Co. , 47 Minn. 313 ; Baltimore, etc., R. R. v. Wagner , 43 Ohio State, 75 . … Reclamation District v. Burger , 122 Cal. 442 ; Craig v. People , 188 Ill., 416 ; McMullen v. State , 105 Ind. 334 .
Cited 2 timesPublished211 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1937
In S. v. … S. v. Ratcliff , 199 N.C. 9 ; S. v.
Cited 19 timesPublished70 N.C. 570 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874
Leach v. R. R. , 65 N.C. 486 ; Alexander v. Commissioners , 67 N.C. 331 . … *Page 463 Johnson v. Commissioners , 67 N.C. 101 ; Sedberry v. Commissioners , 66 N.C. 486 . There is no error. This will be certified. (573) PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed. Bank v. Comrs. , 135 N.C. 252 ; Glenn v.
Cited 0 timesPublished200 N.C. 364 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1931
Wilmington v. McDonald, 133 N. C., 548 .” Church v. Church, 158 N. C., at p. 566; Horney v. Mills, 189 N. C., 729 . This discretion is ordinarily not reviewable. In McNair v. Yarboro, 186 N. … Cahoon v. Everton, 187 N. C., 369 ; Roberts v. Merritt, 189 N. C., 194 ; Howard v. Hinson, 191 N. C., 366 ; Greenville v. Munford, 191 N. C., 373 ; Burton v. Smith, 191 N. C., 599 ; Butler v. *371 Armour, 192 N.
Cited 7 timesPublished207 N.C. 50 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1934
Rockingham v. Hood, Comr., 204 N. C., 618 , 169 S. E., 191 ; Mfg. Co. v. Comrs. of Pender, 196 N. C., 744 , 147 S. E., 284 . The injunction, therefore, was properly continued to the hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublished113 N.C. 174 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893
Cited: Bank v. Cotton Mills , 115 N.C. 513 ; Light Co. v. Light Co. , 116 N.C. 119 ; Cooper v. Security Co. , 122 N.C. 464 ; Howard v. Warehouse Co. , 123 N.C. 91 ; Graham v. Carr , 130 N.C. 274 ; Holshouser v. … Hardware Co. , 175 N.C. 451 ; Besseliew Co. v. Brown , 177 N.C. 68 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedGraham Ex Rel. Graham v. Sandhill Power Co.
189 N.C. 381 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1925
Brown attended the boy, examined and treated him, and gave in detail his injuries. … In Benton v. Public Service Corp., 165 N. C., p. 355, Brown, J.
Cited 15 timesPublished270 N.C. 622 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1967
State v. Downey, supra; State v. Crisp, 244 N.C. 407 , 94 S.E. 2d 402 . The State’s evidence contains no suggestion that defendant shot Brown accidentally. … Neither Brown nor anyone else had made an assault upon defendant. State v. Hightower, 226 N.C. 62 , 36 S.E. 2d 649 ; State v. Mosley, 213 N.C. 304 , 195 S.E. 830 .
Cited 25 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Bouldin v. Davis
197 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1929
On this point we are referred by the appellant to Britt v. Board of Canvassers, 172 N. C., 797 , and to Alexander v. Pharr, 179 N. … L., 656; 32 Cyc., 1412; Ames v. Kansas, 111 U. S., 449, 461 , 28 Law Ed., 482, 487; Brooks v. State, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1126; S. v. Hardie, 23 N. C., 42 ; Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C., 93 ; S. v. Norman, 82 N. C., 687 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedJohnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
300 N.C. 247 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980
Edmisten v. J. C. … Spiegel, Inc. v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 540 F. 2d at 294 ; cf. Federal Trade Comm’n v.
Overruled on other grounds by Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. Evans, 323 N.C. 559 (1988)Cited 281 timesPublished210 N.C. 530 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1936
Provided, however, that all such persons so applying to said board for examination shall be examined only on the subjects of anatomy, physiology, pathology, and diagnosis.” … As was said in Brown v. Shyne, 242 N. Y., 176 , 44 A. L.
Cited 16 timesPublishedDeminski v. State Bd. of Educ.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 2021
v. THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION and THE PITT COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 269 N.C. … Wilson, and North Carolina School Boards Association, by Allison Brown Schafer, for North Carolina School Boards Association, amicus curiae. NEWBY, Chief Justice.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna