Case law

Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

369 N.C. 46 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2016

Lambeth v. City of Thomasville

179 N.C. 452 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1920

Brown, J. Tbe power of the defendant to enter into the contract sued upon does not seem to be denied, at least it is not raised by any assignment of error or discussed in the defendant’s brief. … Wyatt v. R. R., 156 N. C., 307 ; Whitfield v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 211 ; Davenport v. R. R., 148 N. C., 287 ; Wade v. Tel. Co., 147 N. C., 219 ; Wilkinson v. Dunbar, 149 N. C., 20 ; R. R. v. Church, 104 N. C., 525 .

Greenleaf v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

91 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1884

secretary of a railroad corporation to make contracts binding' such corporation, and unless from t,be evidence the jury believe that the secretary of the defendant company was expressly authorized by a regular vote of the board … We cannot know how much evidence was offered not contained in the statement on appeal., Ward v. Herrin, 4 Jones, 23 ; Long v. Gantley, 4 Dev. & Bat., 313 ; Brumble v. Brown, 71 N. C., 513 ; Whissenhunt v. Jones, 80 N.

Briggs v. Industrial Bank of Richmond

197 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 24, 1929

The remedy prescribed by law for usurious transactions is thus stated in Ripple v. Mortgage Corp., 193 N. C., 422 , 137 S. E., 156 . … Shober v. Hauser, 20 N. C., 222 .

Whitaker v. Earnhardt

289 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1976

Brown, 262 N.C. 438 , 137 S.E. 2d 827 ; Burnsville v. Boone, 231 N.C. 577 , 58 S.E. 2d 351 . … Hall v. Board of Elections, 280 N.C. 600 , 187 S.E. 2d 52 ; Sternberger v. Tannenbaum, 273 N.C. 658 , 161 S.E. 2d 116 ; London v. London, 271 N.C. 568 , 157 S.E. 2d 90 .

Town of Canton v. Harris

177 N.C. 10 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1919

In Sharp v. … In Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 -337, the only.testimony considered that in any way militates against this position seems to have been admitted without objection. And in Boggan v. Horne, 97 N.

Powell v. ProDev X, LLC

367 N.C. 511 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 2014

McRary v. . McRary

228 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1948

Eaton , 120 A.L.R., 1354 , Anno. p. 1366; Priest v. Board of Trustees , 232 U.S. 604 , 58 L.Ed., 751 ; Baker v. Baker, Eccles, Co. , 242 U.S. 394 , 61 L.Ed., 386 ; Perkins v. Mining Co.; 132 P.2d 70 ; Sharp v. … Davenport v. Gannon , 123 N.C. 362 , 68 Am. St. Rep., 827 ; Bullock v. Bullock , 30 A. 676 (N. J.); Taylor v. Taylor, supra; Cook v. Brown , 128 A.L.R., 1396 (Mo.); Cline v.

City of Hickory v. Catawba County

206 N.C. 165 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1934

Elliott v. Board of Equalization, 203 N. C., 749 ; Julian v. Ward, 198 N. C., 480 . … Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 74 . This is the principle underlying the present case.

First National Bank of Oxford v. King

164 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913

Brown, J. … this note to become due and payable at once, with full power and authority to said bank to sell, assign, and deliver the whole or any part thereof, or any substitutes therefor, or any additions thereto, at any broker’s board

Causey v. . Guilford County

192 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1926

Howard v. Board of Education, 189 N. C., 675 ; Cameron v. Highway Commission, 188 N. C., 84 ; Lee v. Waynesville, 184 N. C., 565 . … Sparkman v. Comrs., supra, Coble v. Comrs., 184 N. C., 342 , and Plott v. Comrs., 187 N. C., 125 , dealt with special taxing *311 districts. Harrington v.

State v. Simmons

278 N.C. 468 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1971

State v. Giles, 254 N.C. 499 , 119 S.E. 2d 394 ; State v. Bell, supra; Goodwin v. U. S., 347 F. 2d 793 ; U. S. v. Owens, 346 F. 2d 329 ; State v. Durham, 367 S.W. 2d 619 . … One of the investigating officers shone his flashlight into the car’s interior and saw two brown paper bags resembling bricks.

In Re the Appeal of Martin

286 N.C. 66 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974

Brown v. Comrs. of Richmond County, 223 N.C. 744 , 28 S.E. 2d 104 (1943). We held in State v. … Board of Review v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 200 Ala. 532 , 76 So. 858 (1917) ; City of Sebring v. Wolf, 105 Fla. 516 , 141 So. 736 (1932) ; C. Hewitt and Sons Co. v. Keller, supra; Baltimore County v.

Henderson v. City of Wilmington

191 N.C. 269 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1926

In Wilson v. Board of Aldermen, 74 N. … Storm v. Wrightsville Beach, supra; and cases cited; Brown v. R. R., 188 N. C., 52 ; Ketchie v. Hedrick, supra; *278 Armstrong v. Comrs., 185 N. C., 405 ; Williams v. Comrs., 176 N. C., 554 ; Stephens Co. v.

Owens v. Voncannon

252 N.C. 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1960

Claus v. Lee.

140 N.C. 552 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1906

Brown, J. 1. In order to make a prima facie case, the plaintiff offered in evidence, under .the provisions of the statute, Revisal, section 1625, an itemized account of $35.53 *553 duly verified. … Luckhart v. Ogden, 30 Colo., 557 ; Morrison v. Wells, 48 Kansas, 494; Searcy v. Hunter, 81 Texas, 644 ; Furniture Co. v. Board Education, 58 N. J., 646; Hill v. Hobart, 16 Me., 168; Am. Express Co. v.

Moore v. Palmer

132 N.C. 969 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1903

Gray v. Cooper, 65 N. C., 183 , Cowan v. Layburn, 116 N. C., 526; Johnson v. Rich, 118 N. C., 270 . … Brown’s personal representative is not a party to this action. The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.

Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

368 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2016

Powell v. Prodev X, LLC

367 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2014

Powell v. Prodev X, LLC

367 N.C. 223 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2013