Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.65s
81 N.C. 201 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1879
For the board and tuition of his ward at Floral College, the defendant guardian gave his three several notes to the plaintiffs, as the business managers of the college, and signed each of the notes with his own name as “guardian … Brown, 67 N. C., 475 . But admitting they have reference to an assignee of the ward, that will not help the plaintiffs, for they are not the assignees of the ward.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n
637 S.E.2d 515 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 2006
Cited 0 timesPublished359 N.C. 177 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 2004
See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609 , 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608 , 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002). AFFIRMED.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNationwide Homes of Raleigh, N. C., Inc. v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
262 N.C. 79 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1964
When the account was opened, Currin delivered to defendant a document -captioned ■ “AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION” which stated plaintiff’s Board of Directors, on August 1, 1961, adopted a resolution authorizing S. T. … Boney v. Bank, supra; Pelican Well, Tool & Supply Company v. Sabine State Bank & Trust Company, 138 So. 161 ; Brown v. Daugherty, 120 Fed. 526 ; 1 Morse on Banks and Banking, (6 Ed.) 723-4.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Dorothea Dix Hospital v. Davis
292 N.C. 147 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1977
See Ollerton v. Diamenti, 521 P. 2d 899 (Utah 1974) ; Robb v. Estate of Brown, 518 S.W. 2d 729 (Mo. App. 1974) ; Department of Mental Hygiene v. Hawley, 379 P. 2d 22 (Cal. 1963). … In Foster v.
Cited 16 timesPublished208 N.C. 699 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935
Griffith et al. v. Board of Education of Forsyth County, 183 N. C., 408 . Hawke v. Smith, 253 U. S., 221 , 64 L. Ed., 871 . … In Williams v. Brown, 127 N. C., 51 (52), is the following: “The court cannot enjoin the defendant from talking, nor from threatening to enjoin the plaintiff.
Cited 0 timesPublished104 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889
Pratt v. Law, 4 Myer’s Fed. Dig., Contracts, 1046; Chapain v. Brown, 10 At., 1 Rep., 639; Sarky v. Municipality, 61 Am. Dec., 221 ; Port. Hudson v. Chadwick, 52 Mich., 320 ; Harrison v. Augusta Factory, 73 Ga., 447 . … It is not necessary to decide whether the Mayor of the town of Taylorsville, by joining the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, could, b3r virtue of a private sale, make a valid conveyance of any land belonging
Cited 61 timesPublishedCorwin as Trustee for Beatrice Corwin Living Irrevocable Trust v. British American Tobacco PLC
371 N.C. 605 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 2018
Reynolds, an American tobacco company, was created after Reynolds' predecessor entity acquired Brown & Williamson (B&W), another tobacco company. … In Kahn v.
Cited 206 timesPublished141 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 24, 1906
Brown, J. 1. The second issue was unnecessary. … R. v. Candor, 75 Ga., 51 . Also of engineers. Cobb v. R. R., 37 S. C., 194.
Cited 26 timesPublishedWorsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.
239 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1954
Greene v. Board of Education, 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E. 2d 129 . … Greene v. Board of Education, supra, and cases cited; Greene v. Spivey, 236 N.C. 435 , 73 S.E. 2d 488 ; In re Sams, 236 N.C. 228 , 72 S.E. 2d 421 ; Parsons v. Swift & Co., 234 N.C. 580 , 68 S.E. 2d 296 ; Brown v.
Cited 27 timesPublished260 N.C. 491 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1963
Davis v. Brown, 241 N.C. 116, 118 , 84 S.E. 2d 334 , and cases cited; Franklin v. Faulkner, 248 N.C. 656, 659 , 104 S.E. 2d 841 . The title to all lands of which J. T. … Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95, 98 , 92 S.E. 2d 682 , and oases cited; Cannon v. Baker, 252 N.C. 111, 113 , 113 S.E. 2d 44 ; Lackey v. Board of Education, 258 N.C. 460, 462 , 128 S.E. 2d 806 .
Cited 4 timesPublished361 N.C. 610 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 2007
Brown, Jr., M.D., a board-certified forensic psychiatrist on the clinical faculty at the University of Virginia, attempted to evaluate defendant, it was without the prior knowledge of defense counsel. … In State v.
Cited 88 timesPublished207 N.C. 48 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1934
Parker v. Debnam, 195 N.C. 56 , 141 S.E. 535 ; Castle v. Threadgill , 203 N.C. 441 , 166 S.E. 313 ; Shelly v. Grainger , 204 N.C. 488 , 168 S.E. 736 . … Moore v. Monument Co. , 166 N.C. 211 , 81 S.E. 170 ; Rousseau v. Bullis , 201 N.C. 12 . Affirmed. *Page 50
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of the New Bern Graded Schools v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
230 N.C. 264 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1949
Cited 2 timesPublishedFlorence Concrete Products, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board for General Contractors
341 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1995
See Baker Construction Co. v. Phillips, 333 N.C. 441 , 426 S.E.2d 679 (1993). Based on our holding in Vogel v. … Rev. 1968; Brown v. Sikes, 188 S.C. 288 , 198 S.E. 854 (1938).
Cited 0 timesPublished200 N.C. 142 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931
S. v. Bowman , 80 N.C. 437 ; S. v. Crockett , 82 N.C. 599 ; S. v. Burton , 94 N.C. 948 ; S. v. Randall , 170 N.C. 762 ." In S. v. … Riley, the father, said: `Yes, sir, you are the man that was at my house and introduced yourself as Brown from High Point.'
Cited 11 timesPublishedHuskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.
238 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1953
Branch v. Board of Education, supra; 28 Am. Jur., Injunctions, section 268. … R. v. Transit Co., 195 N.C. 305 , 141 S.E. 882 ; Brown v. Aydlett, 193 N.C. 832 , 136 S.E. 721 ; Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N.C. 32 , 135 S.E. 480 ; Brinkley v. Norman, 190 N.C. 851 , 129 S.E. 145 ; Johnson v.
Cited 8 timesPublished181 N.C. 188 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1921
Roberts v. R. R., 143 N. C., 179 . Indeed, the facts are very similar to those in Bucken v. R. R., 157 N. C., 443 , “Acting within the scope of employment means while on duty.” Cook v. R. R., 128 N. C., 336 . In Ange v. … Jackson v. Tel. Co., 139 N. C., 347 .
Cited 13 timesPublishedAdams Creek Associates v. Davis
367 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublished358 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 12, 2004
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna