Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnc

10,000+ results

1.91s

  • Richardson v. City of Greensboro

    174 N.C. 540 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 14, 1917

    Brown, J. The purpose of this proceeding is to compel the defendants to furnish plaintiff water and sewerage service on what is known as the flat rate. … Powell v. Duluth, 91 Minn., 53 ; Steward v. Water Co., 90 Col., 635 ; Bldg. Co. v. Water Co., 90 Va., 83 , and by this Court in Horner v. Electric Co., 153 N. C., 535 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commissioners v. . MacDonald

    148 N.C. 125 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1908

    BROWN, J., concurring arguendo . CONNOR, J., dissenting; HOKE, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. … Board of Education v. Commrs. , 107 N.C. 110 . It does not appear in this record that it will be necessary to levy taxes in excess of the constitutional limitation to meet the interest on these bonds.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Proposed Foreclosure of Claim of Lien

    366 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2012

    See, e.g., James River Equip., Inc. v. Tharpe’s Excavating, Inc., 179 N.C. … See, e.g., Pue v. Hood, 222 N.C. 310, 313 , 22 S.E.2d 896, 898 (1942); Brown v. Woodrun Ass’n, 157 N.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Weesner v. Davidson County

    182 N.C. 604 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1921

    Cram v. Cram, 116 N. C., 288 . See, also, chapter 73 of-the Consolidated Statutes on the subject of “Statutory Construction.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. . Elon College

    224 N.C. 11 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1944

    Geer , 171 N.C. 672 , 88 S.E. 874 ; Re Murray , 75 A.L.R., 720 ; Gulf Refining Co. v. Brown , 116 A.L.R., 449 ; Anno. 19 A.L.R., 226 , 1172, and 20 A.L.R., 686 ; 14 R. C. L., 65; 27 Am. Jur., 479 ; Henry v. … Knudson v. Jackson, supra; Bingham City Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Utah , 243 P. 113 ; Spivey and McGill v. Nixon, supra; Mobley v. Brown , 151 Okla. 167 , 83 A.L.R., 1014 ; Hamilton v.

    Cited 170 timesPublished
  • Creasman v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N

    279 N.C. 361 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1971

    In Parker v. Brown, 131 N.C. 264 , 42 S.E. 605 , the trial judge sustained the defendant’s objection to this question: Was Spencer “the agent of Brown for the purchase of the lumber?” … In Phillips v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Goldston v. Chambers

    272 N.C. 53 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1967

    In Knowles v. … “The judge then left the court to board the train, and the jury afterwards returned a verdict in favor of the defendant.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person

    196 N.C. 257 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 14, 1928

    Hartsfield v. Craven County, 194 N. C., 358 , 139 S. E., 698 ; Hall v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 768 , 140 S. E., 739 ; Mayo v. Commissioners, ante, 15; Commissioners v. Spitzer, 173 N. C., 147 , 91 S. E., 707 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kitchin v. . Wood

    154 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 12, 1911

    BROWN, J. … Lamborn v. Bell, 18 Col., 349 ; Willis v. Mabon, 48 Minn., 140 . In the learned dissenting opinion of the present Chief Justice in Russell v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Nathan v. Charlotte Street Railway Co.

    118 N.C. 1066 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

    Pickett v. Railroad, 117 N. C., 616 ; McAdoo v. Railroad, 105 N. C., 140 ; Lay v. Railroad, 109 N. C., 410 ; Denmark v. Railroad, 107 N. C., 185 ; Scott v. Railroad, 96 N. C., 428 . … Clark v. Riddle, decided at this Term; Sledge v. Elliott, 116 N. C., 712 ; Brown v. Mitchell, 102 N. C., 347 . In Merony v. McIntyre, 82 N.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Watkins v. Murrow

    253 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961

    Hough-Wylie Co. v. Lucas, 236 N.C. 90 , 72 S.E. 2d 11 ; Bryant v. Lumber Co., 174 N.C. 360 , 93 S.E. 926 ; Logan v. R.R., 116 N.C. 940 ; Aycock v. R.R., 89 N.C. 321 . The result reached in Brown v. … The conclusion reached in Brown v. Truck Lines was last declared the law of this State in Suggs v. Truck Lines, 253 N.C. 148 , decided in October 1960.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Bd. of Elections of Henderson Cnty.

    805 S.E.2d 680 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tillett v. Norfolk & Western R. R.

    118 N.C. 1031 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

    Smith v. Smith, 117 N. C., 326 ; Wolf v. Arthur, 112 N. C., 691 . … The plaintiff boarded the train while other passengers were getting on, and at a place where the company was accustomed to receive them, and had a right to receive them. Browne v. Railroad, 108 N. C., 34 .

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Waynesville v. . Satterthwait

    136 N.C. 225 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1904

    Brown v. Comrs. , 21 (232) Pa., 43. … People v. R. R. , 118 Ill. 520 . In S. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hinkle v. Hinkle

    266 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 14, 1966

    Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N.C. 742 , 138 S.E. 12 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Turner v. Turner, 205 N.C. 198 , 170 S.E. 646 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 ; Holden v. Holden, supra. … And in Walker v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. Board of Trustees of the Retirement System of the City of Wilmington

    224 N.C. 359 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1944

    The Board of Health of New Hanover County operates under a contract with the State Board of Health, and the employees of the county board are therefore operating under the Merit System of certain departments of the State … The Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of New Hanover County was created by ch. 49, Public Laws 1937. This Act invests the control of the county board in the State Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holton v. . Comrs. of Mecklenburg County

    93 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1885

    And to effectuate this purpose the better, it is provided in §17, “that the chairman of the board of commissioners shall make out a list of the names of each tax payer, of the amount of the road tax with which each stands

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Lilly v. . Com'rs of Cumberland Co.

    69 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

    And it is the same point as in the case Ruffin v. Commissioners of Orange, at this term; where we consider it more at large.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Elizabeth City v. . Banks

    150 N.C. 407 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1909

    We held, in Brown v. Electric Co. , 138 N.C. 533 , and Station v. R. … Moose v. Carson , *Page 340 104 N.C. 431 ; White v. R. R. , 113 N.C. 610 ; Southport v. Stanly , 125 N.C. 465 ; Turner v. Commissioners , 127 N.C. 153 . In White v. R. R., supra, Shepherd, C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • City of Raleigh v. Edwards

    235 N.C. 671 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952

    Glenn, 220 N.C. 620 , 18 S.E. 2d 197 ; Davis v. Robinson, 189 N.C. 589 , 127 S.E. 697 ; East Side Builders v. Brown, 234 N.C. 517 , 67 S.E. 2d 489 . See also Glenn v. … Board of Education, 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 ; Hiatt v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.