Case law

Taylor v. . Wahab

154 N.C. 219 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1911

McNair v. Pope, 100 N. C., 408 ; Hamilton v. *224 Buchanan, 112 N. C., 471; Kelly v. McNeill, 118 N. C., 353 ; Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 405 . … Cobb v. Edwards, 117 N. C., 253 ; Lehew v. Hewitt, 130 N. C., 22 ; Avery v. Stewart, 136 N. C., 430 .

Lynn v. Wheeler

260 N.C. 658 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1963

Chambers v. Allen, 233 N.C. 195 , 63 S.E. 2d 212 ; Maddox v. Brown, 232 N.C. 542 , 61 S.E. 2d 613 . … The Lowell barricades consisted of two heavy boards secured to poles five *662 or six feet high. However, he 'admitted these boards were on the inside of the track to protect the infield enclosure.

Ratcliff v. Rodman

258 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1962

The sole relief sought by plaintiff is the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring the Beaufort County Board of Elections “to permit the filing of plaintiff for the nomination of the Republican Party as Representative of … Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578 , 61 S.E. 2d 607 ; Nance v. Winston-Salem, 229 N.C. 732 , 51 S.E. 2d 185 ; Penland v. Gowan, 229 N.C. 449 , 50 S.E. 2d 182 ; Rousseau v. Bullis, 201 N.C. 12 , 158 S.E. 553 .

Hammond v. City of Charlotte

206 N.C. 604 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1934

In the Elliott case, for $51,881.77; in the Brown case for $3,188.86, a total recovery of $90,102.88. In the Hammond case, supra, 205 N. … Umstead v. Board of Elections, 192 N. C., 139 (142).

State v. . Nipper

166 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1914

These statutes clearly contemplate tbat tbe control and discipline of convicts and particularly in reference to their punishment, corporal or other, shall be pursuant to rules formally made and published by tbe board of county … Walker, J., and BrowN, J., concurring in this opinion.

In re the Proposed Foreclosure of Claim of Lien

366 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2012

See, e.g., James River Equip., Inc. v. Tharpe’s Excavating, Inc., 179 N.C. … See, e.g., Pue v. Hood, 222 N.C. 310, 313 , 22 S.E.2d 896, 898 (1942); Brown v. Woodrun Ass’n, 157 N.C.

Town of Lumberton v. John Nuveen & Co.

144 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1907

The language of section 1 of the act gives to the commissioners a discretion as to the time of payment, subject to the thirty-year limit Bank v. Ayer, 24 Ind. App., 212 ; Catron v. County, 106 Mo., 659 ; Baker v. … Seattle, 2 Wash., 576 ; Turpin v. County, 48 S. W., 1085 ; Cullen v. Water Co., 113 Cal., 503 ; Manufacturing Co. v. Elizabeth, 42 N. J. Law, 249.

Farris v. . R. R.

151 N.C. 484 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1909

Bradley v. R. R. , 126 N.C. 735 ; Brown v. R. R. , 32 N.Y. 597 ; Falener v. R. R. , 68 Miss. 355 ; R. R. v. Summers , 68 Miss. 566 ; French v. R. R. , 116 Mass. 537 ; R. R. v. Garvey , 58 Ill. 83 ; R. R. v. … Crossing at this point enabled the employees to reach their homes and boarding places more quickly and to return to their work more promptly.

R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.

169 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1915

Y.), 366; Summerville v. R. R. , 22 N.J. Law, 495 ; R. R. v. Board of Education , 32 Utah 305 ; Duke of Buccleuch v. Boards of Works , L. R. 5, H. L. 418; Comstock v. R. R. , 169 Pa., 287 ; Summerville v. … The Court also said, in Brown v.

Williams v. County Commissioners

176 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1918

Clark v. Statesville, 139 N. C., 490 ; Duke v. Brown, 96 N. C., 127 . … The power to order a new registration or to revise the “polling book” of voting precincts is conferred by the statute on the county board of elections.

Colt v. . Kimball

190 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1925

Gin Co. , 119 Ga. 851 ); Illinois ( Cayne v. Avery , 189 Ill. 378 ); Iowa ( Holt v. Brown , 63 Iowa 319 ); Maryland ( Bagby v. Walker , 78 Md. 239 ); Michigan ( Bollenbacher v. … Reid , 155 Mich. 277 ); Minnesota ( Palmer v. Breen , 34 Minn. 39 ); Missouri ( Smith v. Shell , 82 Mo. 215 ); Nebraska ( McGinnis v. Johnson Co. , 74 Neb. 356 ); New York ( Browne v.

Braswell v. Pamlico Insurance & Banking

159 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1912

Solomon v. Bates, 118 N. C., 311 ; White v. Kincaid, 149 N. C., 415 . In furtherance of this allegation the plaintiffs offer to sub- . mit these'issues: 1. … Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U. S., 132 ; 3 Cook on Corporations, sec. 703; Solomon v. Bates, supra. The judgment' of the Superior Court is Affirmed.

Nichols v. . Edenton

125 N.C. 12 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1899

Action for $37.50, the salary of plaintiff as one of the board of councilmen of defendant. This amount is conceded, if plaintiff is entitled to recover. … This is his right and the board of councilmen are powerless to divest him of it by any resolution. Affirmed.

State v. . Williams

153 N.C. 595 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1910

Brown, J., after stating the case. … It is true that in People v. Mayer, 84 N. Y.

Hayes v. . Elon College

224 N.C. 11 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 1, 1944

Geer , 171 N.C. 672 , 88 S.E. 874 ; Re Murray , 75 A.L.R., 720 ; Gulf Refining Co. v. Brown , 116 A.L.R., 449 ; Anno. 19 A.L.R., 226 , 1172, and 20 A.L.R., 686 ; 14 R. C. L., 65; 27 Am. Jur., 479 ; Henry v. … Knudson v. Jackson, supra; Bingham City Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Utah , 243 P. 113 ; Spivey and McGill v. Nixon, supra; Mobley v. Brown , 151 Okla. 167 , 83 A.L.R., 1014 ; Hamilton v.

State v. . Brabham

108 N.C. 793 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

Jones v. Jones, 80 N. C., 247 ; State v. Boon, 82 N. C., 648 ; State v. Whitfield, 92 N. C., 831 . … State v. Sears, Phil., 146; State v. Knox, ibid., 312; State v. Gee, 92 N. C., 756 .

Raleigh Improvement Co. v. Andrews

176 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1918

Brown, J. The following written contract was entered into by the late Col. A. B. … Dorman v. R. R., 7 Fla., 281 ; R. R. v. Bailey, 18 Ohio St., 208 .

Hall v. . Quinn

190 N.C. 326 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 21, 1925

Hunter v. Murfee, 126 Ala., 123 ; Fitzgerald v. Modoc County, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.), (Cal.), 1229; Wright v. Board of Education, 152 S. W., 543 ; Forman v. Safe & Trust Co., 80 At. (Md.), 298; Brown v. Caldwell, 48 A. R. … V.), 376; Highbee v. Rodeman, 28 N. E. (Ind.), 442; Raley v. Umatilla County, 3 A. S. R., 142. In Rawson v.

Richardson v. City of Greensboro

174 N.C. 540 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 14, 1917

Brown, J. The purpose of this proceeding is to compel the defendants to furnish plaintiff water and sewerage service on what is known as the flat rate. … Powell v. Duluth, 91 Minn., 53 ; Steward v. Water Co., 90 Col., 635 ; Bldg. Co. v. Water Co., 90 Va., 83 , and by this Court in Horner v. Electric Co., 153 N. C., 535 .

State v. Mitchell

217 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1940

of efficiency to be required of an applicant for license by the Board of Examiners. … (McCarthy v. Second Parish, 71 Me., 318, 36 Am. Rep., 320 ; Brown v. Trust Co., 174 Pa., 443 , 34 Atl., 335 ; Koppe & Steinichen v. Rylander, 29 Ga. App., 41 , 114 S. E., 81, 83 .)