Case law

State v. . Trull

169 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1915

When there is merely matter of suspicion it is purely in the discretion of the presiding judge, citing Moore v. Edmiston , 70 N.C. 481 ; S. v. Brittain supra; Baker v. Brown , 151 N.C. 17 , and S. v. Tilghman, supra . … In Baker v. Brown this proposition is fully discussed and sustained by Walker, J . In S. v.

North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association v. Board of Trustees of Guilford Technical Community College

672 S.E.2d 680 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 2008

672 S.E.2d 680 (2008) NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE. No. 470P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 11, 2008. Christopher J.

Sherrod v. . Dawson

154 N.C. 525 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1911

Brown, J. The facts as presented by the record are that certain notes and mortgages, solvent credits, are in the hands of J. P. Bunn, an attorney of Rocky' Mount, N. C. … Range Co. v. Carver, 118 N. C., 331 ; Armstrong v. Stedman, 130 N. C., 217 ; Brinkley v. Smith, 130 N.

Deese v. Town of Lumberton

211 N.C. 31 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1936

Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 598 ; Hill v. Comrs., 190 N. C., 123 ; S. v. Horne, 191 N. C., 375 . See concurring opinion and cases cited in Webb v. Port Commission, 205 N. C., 663 , p. 678, et seq. See, also, Glenn v. … Board of Education, 210 *35 N. C., 525. Under the above authorities, plaintiffs lose on this aspect and by the Holton case, below cited. In Holton v. Mocksville, 189 N.

Walker v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

793 S.E.2d 220 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 22, 2016

Lawrence v. . Nissen

173 N.C. 359 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1917

Brown, J. … In White v. Morley, 2 Q.

Tuttle v. . Puitt

68 N.C. 543 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873

Ward v. Stowe, 2 Dev. Eq. 509 ; Freeman v. Knight, 2 Ired. Eq. 72 ; 2 Redfield on Wills 411, citing among other cases Rayner v. … Mowbray, 3 Brown’s, ch. cas. 234, where the Lord Chancellor or-says: “ When a rule has been laid down it is best to abide by it.

Hansley v. Tilton

234 N.C. 3 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1951

v. … Undoubtedly the county board of education, as an agency or instrumentality of the State, enjoys immunity to liability for injury or loss resulting from the negligence of the driver of its school bus. Benton v.

Galyon v. Stutts

241 N.C. 120 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1954

A direct contempt consists of words spoken or acts committed in the actual or constructive presence of the court while it is in session (S. v. Woodfin, 27 N.C. 199 ; S. v. … Luther v. Luther, 234 N.C. 429 , 67 S.E. 2d 345 .

HILL CONDOMINIUM I ASS'N. v. Colony Co.

325 S.E.2d 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1985

325 S.E.2d 485 (1985) COLONY HILL CONDOMINIUM I ASSOCIATION, Colony Hill Condominium I, Board of Directors of Colony Hill Condominium I Association, Larry Ferrell, Jennie B. … Brown, Donald P. Vandayburg, Dorothy Vandayburg, U.S. Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Insurance Group, Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company, North River Insurance Company v. COLONY COMPANY, A Partnership; Fred J.

Miller v. North Carolina State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors

322 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1988

The Board’s decision reprimanded petitioner and suspended his license. … The Notice of Action Without Hearing sent to petitioner by the Board informed petitioner that the Board’s “intended action” was a reprimand and fine.

Clark v. . Woolen Mills

204 N.C. 529 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1933

Kenan v. Motor Co., 203 N. C., at p. 110; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 ; Richey v. Cotton Mills, 203 N. C., 595 ; Massey v. Board of Education, ante, 193, 196. … Brown v. Ice Co., 203 N. C., 97 ; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 . The Industrial Commission said: “This is a very interesting case. It has given the trial Commissioner much concern.

Huskins v. Yancey Hospital

238 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1953

Branch v. Board of Education, supra; 28 Am.Jur., Injunctions, section 268. … Bank, 200 N.C. 441 , 157 S.E. 419 ; Cullins v. North Carolina State College, 198 N.C. 337 , 151 S.E. 646 ; Norfolk So. R. R. v. Rapid Transit Co., 195, N.C. 305, 141 S.E. 882 ; Brown v.

Sprunt v. . Comrs. of New Hanover

208 N.C. 695 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935

Watkins et al., Board of County Commissioners, and Royster et al., Board of Elections of Vance County, ante , 675, the general provisions of the two statutes are to the same effect, and the pleadings in the two cases are … George v. Hardie , 147 N.C. 88 (97). Affirmed on plaintiffs' appeal. Error on defendants' appeal.

Guy v. Commissioners of Cumberland County

122 N.C. 471 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1898

State v. Muse, 20 N. C., 319 ; State v. Joyner, 81 N. C., 534 ; State v. Stovall, 103 N. C., 416 ; State v. Barringer, 110 N. C., 525 ; State v. Snow, 117 N. … Justice Brown has replied very conclusively in Scott v. Donald, 165 U.

Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

830 S.E.2d 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 2019

Hailey v. . Winston-Salem

196 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1928

Coble v. Comrs., supra . Art. II, sec. 29, applies to the former but not to the latter. Harrington v. Comrs. , 189 N.C. 572 . As a rule school districts are created by the county board of education. C. S., 5480. … The decision in Brown v. Comrs. , 173 N.C. 598 , has direct bearing upon this question. There it is said that the framers of this amendment (Art.

Board of Drainage Commissioners of Parkville Drainage District, No. 1 v. Brett Engineering Co.

165 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1914

Again, the amendatory act of 1911, secs. 9 and 10, provide that— “In. case the total cost exceeds an average of 25 cents per acre on all lands in the district, the board of drainage commissioners shall give notice for three … bonds may, within fifteen days after the publication of said notice, pay to the county treasurer the full amount for which his land is liable, to be ascertained- from the classification sheet and the certificate of the board

Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

827 S.E.2d 307 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 2019

Burke County Road Commissioners v. Commissioners of Burke County

184 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1922

As said in Brown v. Turner, 70 N. C., 93 , quoted with approval in Board of Education v. Comrs., 150 N. … State ex rel Collector v. Dishaw, 42 N. J., 141; People ex rel Dannat v. *468 Comptroller, 71 N. Y., 45 ; People ex rel Dowing v. Stout, 23 N. Y., 338 ; Lansing v. Van Gorder, 24 Mich., 456 ; County Comrs. Pike Co. v.